'My God makes no mistakes': Texas Senate OKs ban on gender-affirming care for young Texans
Source: USA Today/Austin American-Statesman
Chuck Lindell
Austin American-Statesman
AUSTIN. Texas After debating the meaning of God's love, the Texas Senate voted along party lines to give final approval Tuesday to a bill that would ban gender-affirming medical care for transgender Texans who are 17 and younger.
The 18-13 vote sent Senate Bill 1311 to the House, which has one week to vote on the measure, and it came one day after the Senate gave initial approval to the bill, also with all Republicans in favor and all Democrats opposed.
Sen. Beverly Powell, D-Burleson, opened Tuesday's debate by noting that religion played a role in the previous day's discussion of SB 1311.
"I'm concerned, and I don't want to let this go without saying, that transgender people will hear this argument and will conclude there is no place for them in the church, or worse that God doesn't love them exactly as they are," she said.
Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/05/19/after-debating-theology-senate-oks-gender-care-ban-young-texans/5161989001
piddyprints
(14,648 posts)He certainly does make mistakes.
Turning biology into a religious argument does no good for anyone, but thats obvious to everyone here.
TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)-misanthroptimist
(821 posts)Oh, yeah? Then explain the duck-billed platypus. I'll wait.
paleotn
(17,960 posts)Platypus got the leftovers.
A wonderful window genetically into ancient transitional species. A link between ancient reptiles and mammals. Oh, sorry. They don't "believe" in evolution either.
RainCaster
(10,914 posts)He also gave us the intelligence to fix the problems that happen as we grow and age. Gender is just another one of those things that w we have learned how to fix. But it takes compassion for the patient, because the transition is lengthy and difficult.
Claire Oh Nette
(2,636 posts)All kinds of design flaws.
ANd ps. no one voted for his god. Or any god.
Separation of Church and State, FFS.
Let Parents parent their own children.
Fearful, likely closeted, assholes.
paleotn
(17,960 posts)some of us rarely use, but complicate the hell out of human birth.
Phoenix61
(17,019 posts)How is that any part of the constitution?
genxlib
(5,535 posts)If your God does exist, he either makes mistakes or he is an evil bastard not worthy of being worshiped.
Sibelius Fan
(24,396 posts)do not come to term, not due to anything humans do, but due to the design of the system.
God is historys greatest abortionist.
raccoon
(31,120 posts)4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)Made Baby Killers and Child Rapist on purpose?
I was taught that God knows all; past, present, and future.
So God knew what everyone was going to do when he created them.
All evil done was pre-approved by God.
crud
(623 posts)Pharaoh thought about setting the Jews free and then "God hardened his heart". According to the bible Pharaoh had no choice in the matter.
nuxvomica
(12,442 posts)God made people of different colors, different sexual identities, different a lot of things, so if you believe in Him, and believe He makes no mistakes, such laws are an insult to His handiwork.
patphil
(6,208 posts)And yet so many people are critical of the results of God's work.
They are, in effect, judging God.
The actuality of the situation is that God provided for the concept of free will. We are dealt a particular hand by God, but what we do with it is our own business.
The real challenge put forth by God is to be loving, kind, and compassionate. That includes accepting people for what they are.
Essentially, life is all about love. The path of love brings you back to God.
All the anger and hate that is part of the process of judging other people for their differences blocks the flow of God's love into a person. And, without love, the light within them looses it's luster; it's shine.
Without love, light begins to take on a dull, lifeless cast. It begins to manifest as darkness.
The darkness of loveless light is prevalent in so many people.
nuxvomica
(12,442 posts)Paul laid it out very simply, that charity (agape, unconditional love) trumps even the strongest expression of faith. And even for agnostics like me, the concept of God may just be the embodiment of this universal, unconditional love.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Will have to dig into the bill to see what they are explicitly banning before I know how to take this.
janterry
(4,429 posts)restricts puberty blockers and surgery to children. So, it sort of brings Texas in line with some of the current thinking that is bubbling up in other countries (most notably Sweden)
https://legiscan.com/TX/text/SB1646/2021
marble falls
(57,213 posts)SamKnause
(13,110 posts)Separation of Church and State has little meaning.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)...like they were written from a human mind, not the mind of a perfect being; and a really misogynistic mind at that. So I am gonna have to question very existence of this god in the first place.
Marthe48
(17,021 posts)When I read that, I thought about it a lot and came to the conclusion that God thought we'd have enough sense to take care of our kids.
(It is a line from Three Farmers on Their Way to a Dance, by Richard Powers)
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)No commandments against rape either. A lot of the rules seem to be about making sure you treat your God right. Seems like this god is very sensitive about being the center of attention. Must be why Trump likes to pretend (poorly) that he has any faith whatsoever.
Marthe48
(17,021 posts)Therefore, each person is made as God wants. But there is free will.
God wants you to win the lottery. But He lets you pick the numbers.
sanatanadharma
(3,728 posts)De acuerdo
So much truth in few words
The choices are ours to make
The ultimate gift is our heritage
Uncountable desires divert our denouement
The Wizard
(12,548 posts)And so is Texas.
keithbvadu2
(36,910 posts)Saying "My God" acknowledges multiple Gods.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Jeez, they're mean as rattlesnakes, aren't they? Fuckssake.
Paladin
(28,272 posts)RussBLib
(9,036 posts)No one should be referencing imaginary beings when constructing social policy.
We need to vote out the religious fanatics, because that's what this guy is.
Sibelius Fan
(24,396 posts)Disgusting.
Scruffy1
(3,257 posts)A neurologist gave me the answer. God fucked up the wiring.
vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)God didn't make mistakes because he gave us power to become what we truly are. Who we truly feel we are. You'll never stop us from becoming that you fascist fucks.
The GOP endgame for trans kids is not to protect them. It's to fucking kill them.
Initech
(100,102 posts)So yeah god hates you, but feel free to come worship us because he needs money. Right.
jmowreader
(50,562 posts)God hates you the way you are, no matter how good of a person you are, and will throw you in a lake of burning tar for all eternity after you die. But if you change everything about yourself so youre the way we want you to be, and you give us all your money and all your possessions, you might - might, I say, theres always the chance of burning tar if you slip up just a little - escape the lake and go to somewhere nice after you die.
War story follows: The printing plant in North Carolina that I worked at, that no longer exists because the owners wife caught him in bed with another woman and murder-suicided him, donated a job advertising some big charity event to an extremely hardcore Christian church...who, of course, attempted to convert me while I was designing their piece. They told me that Heaven was this wonderful place where all you have to do is lay around and be waited on hand and foot by sinners who didnt see the light and join their church. I told the preacher that being waited on hand and foot sounds like the worst possible thing that could ever happen to me, and Id much rather be one of the people doing the serving.
malthaussen
(17,216 posts)He is not a US citizen. Clearly, whether he loves trans people or not, his minions emphatically do not.
-- Mal
czarjak
(11,289 posts)IbogaProject
(2,841 posts)According to experts, around 1.7% of the population is born with intersex traits - comparable to the number of people born with red hair. Despite this, the term intersex is still widely misunderstood, and intersex people are massively underrepresented.
I have no knowledge about this, other than hearing this statistic. But I did know a surgeon who pioneered a method to move these one way or the other. He had families who were connected and very grateful for his services, so I'd guess the number is correct.
That number means we all know someone who was born somewhere in between. This isn't a rare occurrence. I'm not sure what qualifies making this category.
janterry
(4,429 posts)It has been scientifically disentangled, though.
The 1.7 comes from Fausto-Sterling
Physician and psychologist Leonard Sax identified the flaw(s):
Many reviewers are not aware that this [1.7%] figure includes conditions which most clinicians do not recognize as intersex, such as Klinefelter syndrome, Turner syndrome, and late-onset adrenal hyperplasia. If the term intersex is to retain any meaning, the term should be restricted to those conditions in which chromosomal sex is inconsistent with phenotypic sex, or in which the phenotype is not classifiable as either male or female.
and
Applying this more precise definition, the true prevalence of intersex is seen to be about 0.018%, almost 100 times lower than Fausto-Sterling's estimate of 1.7%.
IbogaProject
(2,841 posts)God doesn't make faulty scientists!
Wow, I will check out your information. One out of five thousand still explains that surgeons busy career.
Warpy
(111,339 posts)and so do they, they just want to waggle their weenies around so we'll know who's boss.
Solly Mack
(90,787 posts)is theocracy.
Theocracy is nothing more than labeling your hate and ignorance a religion and then imposing your hate and ignorance on others as the will of some god.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Why did said entity flood the fucking earth?
They_Live
(3,240 posts)No one needs health care.
PatrickforB
(14,588 posts)Twenty-first century inquisition, anyone?
Moostache
(9,897 posts)I
DON'T
CARE!!!!
And btw, your 'god' does not get a say in the laws of the United States of America, period.
We have no sanctioned religion you putz, so kindly fuck right off.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Is actually a good idea, folks.
I don't trust THESE PEOPLE'S motivation, of course, not in the slightest.
But we generally don't think of 12 and 13 year olds as being 'capable of consent' to much of anything, do we, normally?
And this is not only a lifelong decision, but it's also not all that well-tested.
IMHO, reasonable people can debate the wisdom of allowing such treatments.
It should be based on science though, not imaginary sky daddies.
Ms. Toad
(34,087 posts)Unless the reasonable people are the doctor and the patient. It is no more an outsider's business than abortion is.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)You know ... because I get bad headaches. They are FDA approved after all.
But guess what?
Society has decided that it's really not just up to him and me.
Also ... a 10 year old can't get a C19 vaccine right now.
Would you say that's really up to the 10 year old and the doctor? I'm guessing you wouldn't.
Point is not to make a direct comparison between these 3 treatments, but rather to point out that we make TONS of regulations about what health care providers are allowed to do for (or to) their patients.
I'd also point out that puberty blockers are used off-label in transgender children, this is not an FDA-approved use of these drugs.
As a society, we don't give 12 year olds carte blanche to decide jack shit for themselves (they are not capable of 'consent', are they now?), but for some reason, with this one thing ... they are to be treated like full-blown adults?
Look, I'm pretty friggin liberal, and very trans-friendly, but I'm still not sure how I feel about this treatment, and I think reasonable people can debate the wisdom of allowing it, given these are YOUNG kids, AND we don't have a lot of science on 'what happens to people' if we leverage these drugs for this particular indication. I'm not giving a 'hard no', only saying it's fair to debate it.
Lastly, MANY governments and health agencies around the world are still debating the wisdom and value of such treatments (it's not just stupid wingnuts in Texas) ... should they all just consult Ms. Toad to straight it all out?
As usual, we'll likely have to agree to disagree on this one
Ms. Toad
(34,087 posts)to go through puberty as males. Period. There is absolutely no wiggle room on this.
Like abortion, this IS a matter between a doctor and their patient. The examples you are giving are ridiculous stretches.
COVID 19 does not have full FDA approval for any use, let alone for children. It is only now being tested for children.
Oxycontin is a controlled substance because the substance is inherently dangerous - particularly at the dosage you suggest.
Yes, puberty blockrs are off-label for use in children - as are most drugs at least initially. My daughter took pentasa for 13 years off-label because it was a (then) new drug not tested on children. Off label use of FDA approved drugs is a matter for the doctor and patient to decide.
Unlike controlled substances prescribed at a dangerous level.
Unlike vaccines that are not yet even fully approved for adult use.
Governments should keep their noses out of it, just as they should with abortions. You don't have to create new oppressive, laws to prevent a 10-year old from decidng on her own with a doctor, without parental consent. Existing laws prohibit children, in all but a few circumstances, from consenting to medical procedures on your own.
If you truly believe you can be trans-friendly AND support government prohibition on the use of puberty blockers, I suggest you go have a heart to heart with your trans friends and ask them. And, if you don't have that level of friendship with any trans individuals - then you should perhaps stop proclaiming that you can be trans-friendly and support government interference with the treatment that is **literally** life-saving.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)To be clear, I do NOT support bans based on currently available evidence.
I'm only saying that there is still reasoned debate as to how good of an idea it is to use these drugs in this way.
And it's happening among health agencies all over the world, it's not just RW dickbags in the USA.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)ananda
(28,876 posts)I am so tired of stupid theocrats.
Response to ananda (Reply #47)
hamsterjill This message was self-deleted by its author.
catrose
(5,073 posts)Permanut
(5,637 posts)And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart
If you're going to be a hypocrite, at least try to be a consistent hypocrite. Otherwise you look like a moron.
angrychair
(8,733 posts)In a debate over a legally binding law?
What if I'm Buddhist? Muslim? Pastafarian? Satanist? Atheist? Does this law apply to me?
This debate and its crafting is very Christian-centric for a world that isn't all Christian.
I would even push back against Democratic state senator Powell quoted in the OP..since there is no "god" I don't care if they love me or not. They are not real. Its like telling me the Santa Claus doesn't love me. Who cares.
This law is as ridiculous and unenforceable in my opinion.
LudwigPastorius
(9,170 posts)So the Holocaust was His plan? The Nazis throwing live children into the crematory fires because they didn't want to expend the bullets or gas to kill them?
10,000 children around the world starving to death every day is His plan?
25,000 people dying of cancer every day?
If those things are 'all part of His plan', then His plan is fucked.
machoneman
(4,010 posts)LOL