Activists blockade McDonald's distribution centers in UK
Source: AP
LONDON (AP) Animal rights protesters are blockading four McDonalds distribution centres in the U.K. in an attempt to get the burger chain to commit to becoming fully plant-based by 2025.
Animal Rebellion said Saturday that trucks and bamboo structures are being used at the distribution sites in Hemel Hempstead, Basingstoke, Coventry and Heywood, Greater Manchester, to stop lorries from leaving the depots.
The group said it intends to remain at the sites for at least 24 hours, causing significant disruption to the McDonalds supply chain, adding that it will affect some 1,300 restaurants.
The meat and dairy industry is destroying our planet: causing huge amounts of rainforest deforestation, emitting immense quantities of greenhouse gases and killing billions of animals each year, said James Ozden, a spokesman for the group.
Animal Rebellion protesters suspended from a bamboo structure and on top of a van, being monitored by police officers outside a McDonald's distribution site in Hemel Hempstead, England, Saturday May 22, 2021. Animal rights protesters are blockading four McDonalds distribution centres in the U.K. in an attempt to get the burger chain to commit to becoming fully plant-based by 2025. Animal Rebellion said Saturday that trucks and bamboo structures are being used at the distribution sites in Hemel Hempstead, Basingstoke, Coventry and Heywood, Greater Manchester, to stop lorries from leaving depots. (Yui Mok/PA via AP)
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/europe-blockades-business-960e82b27435408f32b641ac4b19e0a1
Roy Rolling
(6,917 posts)Animal foods/slaughter create greenhouse gasses. Strange, nobody protests animal confinement and slaughter until it affects them with greenhouse gas problems.
But any port in a storm is safer.
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)elias7
(4,007 posts)90% of emissions are from burning of fossil fuels - industry, transportation, electricity, commercial and residential heating. Why pick on the food industry at the exclusion of other industries when it is not even one of the bigger players?
Not a fan of McDonalds but why are they being picked on? Further, they have been quite responsive through the years, changing the oils they use for frying, adding other healthy options, listing nutritional info, pushing for increasing minimum wage. They are blocking a burger joint for not committing to becoming plant based in 4 years? How about every other non-vegan restaurant and grocery store and food service place?
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Made for less tasty and more unhealthy fries.
George II
(67,782 posts)Wolf Frankula
(3,601 posts)Not Us. Vegetarians are very tasty when cooked properly.
Wolf
3Hotdogs
(12,390 posts)They were protesting factory farms run by McD suppliers. McD sent them and other protesters "cease and desist" letters. All complied but the two. McD then sued.
The trial went on for months as the protesters bombarded the court with document after document.
It went south for McD after a corporate executive made disparaging comments about the protesters to the British press. The protesters then sued McD for defamation.
I don't recall exactly how it ended but it didn't go well for McD.
Google: McLibel case. The welfare recipients ended up with 57,000 pound reward from the British government, awarded by the European Council on Human Rights.
paleotn
(17,930 posts)they dropped it...quietly. Hard to imagine someone in corp legal not advising against. That it's a loser in public opinion and maybe even the courts. Just let things die down. But, oh no.
Business schools should add courses called "picking the hills you're willing to die on" and "keep your GD mouth shut". That might curtail some this stupidness.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McLibel_case#Post_court_developments
The true identity of one of the authors of the "McLibel leaflet" is Bob Lambert, a police officer who used the alias Bob Robinson in his five years infiltrating the London Greenpeace group, is revealed in a new book about undercover policing of protest, published next week.
McDonald's famously sued green campaigners over the roughly typed leaflet, in a landmark three-year high court case, that was widely believed to have been a public relations disaster for the corporation. Ultimately the company won a libel battle in which it spent millions on lawyers.
Lambert was deployed by the special demonstration squad (SDS) a top-secret Metropolitan police unit that targeted political activists between 1968 until 2008, when it was disbanded. He co-wrote the defamatory six-page leaflet in 1986 and his role in its production has been the subject of an internal Scotland Yard investigation for several months.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/21/mclibel-leaflet-police-bob-lambert-mcdonalds
During that time, he met Steel, a longstanding social justice campaigner, and started a two-year relationship, telling her that he wanted to spend the rest of his life with her.
He concealed from her the fact he was a member of a secret Metropolitan police undercover unit, the Special Demonstration Squad, that was tasked with spying on political groups.
By the summer of 1991, Dines appeared to start having a mental breakdown, telling Steel he wanted to run away to escape his inner demons. He told her his parents had abused him.
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/mar/09/undercover-uk-police-spy-apologises-after-being-tracked-down-by-woman-he-deceived
The leaflet was distributed in 1986; McDonalds started the libel case in 1990.
McDonalds came out of it looking like they over-reacted; but the real culprit was the British state, which had libel laws beneficial to firms or people who could afford big lawyer fees to crush the average person; and which used the police in awful ways against targets they should have been ignoring.
SouthBayDem
(32,026 posts)It's no secret that McDonald's and other big fast food chains have questionable business practices, but is this protest supposed to deliver any real outcomes or change anyone's minds?
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)I reckon they don't think much about this. It seems to be a trait in a number of protest groups.
George II
(67,782 posts)"I'm here to meet chicks!"
Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)they are succeeding.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)Inconveniencing the company, but not the public (unless they do it for many days in a row), is a pretty good way to get publicity without bad feeling.
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)Not sure of the likelihood of them doing that, but if people don't get their Big Macs, they will not be amused.
JI7
(89,251 posts)for themselves than they would promote vegetarian food by doing things like promoting those businesses and showing people why they should ar least try to cut back on meat.