Bipartisan Senate surface transportation draft proposes $304B for highways
Source: Politico
A Senate committee released a bipartisan draft Saturday of a $303.5 billion highway, road and bridge bill the type of traditional transportation package that Congress is likely to pass in some form in the coming year, despite Republicans rejection of President Joe Bidens latest big infrastructure proposal.
The bill that the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee unveiled would replace an existing surface transportation law that is due to expire in September, making it as close to must-pass as legislation ever gets on Capitol Hill. It is, by necessity, far more limited in scope than Bidens plan, which would total nearly $2 trillion and include spending on needs such as waterways, aviation, broadband, clean water, the power grid, health care and the environment.
Still, the committees proposal could become a cornerstone of the Senates eventual response to Bidens larger American Jobs Plan and achieving a bipartisan agreement on even this piece is a milestone.
-snip-
Committee Chair Tom Carper (D-Del.) released the Saturdays highway draft along with Capito, Transportation Subcommittee Chair Ben Cardin (D-Md.) and Transportation Subcommittee ranking member Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.). The committee said it will mark up the bill on Wednesday.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bipartisan-senate-surface-transportation-draft-proposes-dollar304b-for-highways/ar-AAKh6b7?li=BBnb7Kz
Because the Republicans keep moving the goal posts back
patphil
(6,180 posts)when it comes to a vote, they won't vote for it.
It's part of their plan to delay and reject any bill the Democrats put up.
There is no point in talking to them at all.
modrepub
(3,495 posts)You need to put up state money to get federal funding. Red states that don't want to pay don't get any funds. After a certain amount of time, make any leftovers available to any state that wants more. I'd encourage this to go down to the county level because I expect some Red states to get money generated by their urban/suburban areas and divert it to rural road projects.
Maxheader
(4,373 posts)They could care less if bridges collapse...