Mo Brooks gets arrest warrant for man who served lawsuit on his wife
Source: Al.com
Updated 6:59 AM; Today 6:36 AM
By Paul Gattis | pgattis@al.com
U.S. Rep. Mo Brooks said Wednesday his wife has sworn out an arrest warrant for the man who served a lawsuit at their Huntsville home on June 6.
The Brooks have said they would seek the warrant for misdemeanor criminal trespassing after the process server entered the garage as his wife was returning home.
Brooks wife, Martha, filed a police report immediately after the incident.
An attorney for Democratic California Congressman Eric Swalwell, who named Brooks as a defendant the lawsuit being served, has said there was nothing illegal or inappropriate about the service. In response, Brooks released the home security video of the process server appearing to enter the garage.
Read more: https://www.al.com/news/2021/06/mo-brooks-gets-arrest-warrant-for-man-who-served-lawsuit-on-his-wife.html
Tommy Carcetti
(43,184 posts)Where it belongs.
samnsara
(17,623 posts)Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Brooks is not suing anyone. He is seeking criminal prosecution of the trespasser.
Trespass is simply being on someone else's property without their permission.
It is not ordinarily a criminal offense, in most states, unless some additional conditions are satisfied.
Typically, criminal trespass requires that you actually know the owner doesn't want you there and you enter or remain on the property despite that notice.
That is why, for example, people put up "no trespassing" signs on property where they do not want others to enter. In many states, there is a requirement that criminal trespass require notice, which can be given in the form of signs with a specified maximum spacing between them, for example.
If you are in your garage, and I am walking by and want to talk to you, and if there are no signs or other indications that you do not permit me onto your property, it's fine for me to walk up your driveway and talk to you. If I say "hello" and you say "hello" back, then, sure, I can walk into your garage and talk to you. You didn't provide any reason for me to believe I was not allowed to do it.
But, as soon as you say, "Get out of here" and I do not being to make reasonable progress toward leaving, THEN you have what may be a criminal trespass situation in many states.
This is also why in many states you used to hear things like "breaking and entering" instead of just "entering". If a door is open and you walk through it, then it is a very different situation from opening the door - i.e. "breaking" to make a wider opening - in order to enter.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)Only one time was I welcomed by the party being served. The guy grabbed the subpoena out of my hand and said "I can't wait to see that bitch in Court." Apparently she demanded an increase in child support even though the father was the custodial parent. I believe the Judge rejected her demand.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)I understand it can be hazardous too.
FarPoint
(12,409 posts)Historic NY
(37,451 posts)why else would she run after him except to give it back.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)Atticus
(15,124 posts)What could go wrong?
ancianita
(36,098 posts)Jay25
(417 posts)ancianita
(36,098 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)Last edited Wed Jun 16, 2021, 03:16 PM - Edit history (1)
Was cleaning the house. She had 24 hours to vacate Her home. The hoa took it from under her.
edited to correct acronym
Throck
(2,520 posts)I hate HMO's; legalized tyranny.
What's the back story on this?
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)Eventually they wore her down. She tried to get it up to their satisfaction, but it never seemed to get better. So she decided to move out. She had already purged belongings and was cleaning out the garage when the sheriff showed up. Her story: widowed teacher raising two children on her own. She should have opened those last letters, but she was overwhelmed. Someone picked up about about 100,000 equity for 3000 in hmo penalties
Throck
(2,520 posts)My blood is boiling.
I'm surprised bullshit HOA rules haven't been challenged by the ACLU or some other consumer's group.
Damn lawn Nazis.
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)obamanut2012
(26,081 posts)Medical debt collectors usually are not allowed to do something like that, especially in most states, your house cannot be seized for bankruptcy, etc.
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)What happens is the house goes on the block.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Homeowners Association
Not Health Mismanagement Organization
HUAJIAO
(2,391 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)available.
Lithos
(26,403 posts)Many states have a homestead exemption from seizures like this.
L-
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)When you have a city that is controlled by good ole boys, one of the things they do is take over the HOAs. It's part of a story that I'm writing about.
dsc
(52,163 posts)but you can take a house for HOA fines? Amazing
Baitball Blogger
(46,737 posts)Lithos
(26,403 posts)Something must be in the water...
George II
(67,782 posts)Renew Deal
(81,866 posts)Chainfire
(17,553 posts)LymphocyteLover
(5,644 posts)so tired of their fucking treasonous evil bullshit
ScratchCat
(1,990 posts)He says that attempting to file charges against the server after being served goes nowhere and is a tell tale sign of a complete scumbag.
And this article is so full of legal mis-information its ridiculous. Citizens "swear" out complaints. Police and judges issue arrest warrants if there is probable cause. Brooks isn't "seeking an arrest warrant"; people don't "seek warrants"; police/prosecutors do.
getagrip_already
(14,764 posts)You can swear out a complaint for anything. It is NOT an arrest warrant. Charges have not been filed.
Nor are they likely to be.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)Eventually things will just have to proceed anyway and the person will not be there to defend themselves. The litigation is going to go forward eventually. Delaying the inevitable and make sure to lose.
Of course some can choose to avoid all that and go directly to jail for years at a time for actually physically assaulting a server. Even then, theyll be at that court hearing; just in a jump suit.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)It's up to the judge whether or not the suit is going to proceed. Service is a requirement, and under federal rules, a case that has not been served within 90 days can be dismissed absent service.
Normally, if there are signs the defendant is aware of what is going on, or some other method of providing notice would be effective, the plaintiff will file a motion to ask the court to allow some alternative form of service - such as service by publication (those 'legal notices' in the newspaper) or even by email.
But things aren't going to move forward unless there is service on the defendant (or the defendant has waived service) or the court has expressly ruled on a motion for alternative service.
Rule 4(m)
https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcp/rule_4
(m) Time Limit for Service. If a defendant is not served within 90 days after the complaint is filed, the courton motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiffmust dismiss the action without prejudice against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time. But if the plaintiff shows good cause for the failure, the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)...could just sail the ocean on their mega yacht. But other than that, seems like a normal person would have to quit work and live in an underground hole to avoid it that long.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,323 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,865 posts)The case has been turned over to the Madison County district attorneys office. DA Rob Broussard said last week that extradition would not be sought of Seklecki, who is based in Atlanta, given the nature of the charge. The warrant could be served, however, if Seklecki returned to Huntsville.
tanyev
(42,572 posts)If Brooks hadn't been actively avoiding being served this incident would have never happened.
Submariner
(12,504 posts)so she could have shot him, which is likely the Brook's family preferred order of justice.
RockRaven
(14,974 posts)No reasonable/non-crazy person would think the actions in the video constitute a violation of the law as written, or as applied for that matter.
DanieRains
(4,619 posts)In the Q-Land of Psychos.
Maybe they should arrest Mo and see how he feels.
Incitement of violence.