Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:04 AM Jan 2012

California lawmakers try another 'single-payer' health care bill

Jon Ortiz | The Sacramento Bee

California's "Medicare for all" bill goes before a key Senate committee today, the latest chapter in a long-running battle between universal health insurance supporters and business.

Senate Bill 810, introduced by San Francisco Democrat Sen. Mark Leno, would establish a California Healthcare Agency to run a single-payer health care system that would pool employer and employee payments. It would administer the money and negotiate rates with doctors, hospitals and other medical providers.

As a mammoth player in the industry, the thinking goes, a state-operated system would drive down medical costs and insurance premiums while improving access to care.

The bill doesn't establish any new taxes or fees, preferring to leave that for future legislation.



Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2012/01/17/136083/california-lawmakers-try-another.html#storylink=cpy
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

eridani

(51,907 posts)
1. It isn't a matter of "preferring"
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 09:44 AM
Jan 2012

CA requires that enabling legislation go first. Unfortunately the actual finance bill requires 2/3.

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
2. If they advertised it with a comparison on what health costs are without it
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:00 AM
Jan 2012

I don't see any problem with the financial issue. Just tell how much it costs the taxpayers in California for emergency room visits by people who are uninsured, or about what it costs to fight drug addiction, or even how much it costs for people to abstain from going to get health care until they're too sick not to go, and the cost effectiveness of single payer will be self-evident.

But it'll probably be the insurance companies who do all the comparisons. Fake ones dripping with racist hatred of course.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
3. 20% of California Healthcare cost are for Un-reimbusersed Medical Cost
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 11:46 AM
Jan 2012

ie: Emergency Room visits

demosincebirth

(12,540 posts)
4. The last one was steam-rolled by the Insurnance Industry. It's going to be just like the
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 11:47 AM
Jan 2012

proposition, a few years ago, that would tax the oil companies in California. The Oil companies scared the shit out of the voters about how the price of gasoline was going to go sky high. It didn't pass, but yet the price of a gallon of gas is the highest in the nation. What fools we are.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,350 posts)
6. But he needs more than that
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 01:21 PM
Jan 2012

he needs a 2/3 majority of Dems who are not bought off by the insurance companies. A much steeper hill to climb.

The insurance companies will be flooding the legislators with money offers, job offers, anything for a "no" vote.

 

divide_and_rule

(16 posts)
9. state govts are far more democratic than the fed govt. States rights is a progessive issue
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 05:47 PM
Jan 2012

....or so you would you think

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»California lawmakers try ...