Federal judge rules Gov. Andy Beshear violated law with executive mask mandate
Source: Lexington 18 News
(LEX 18) A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order against Governor Andy Beshear's executive order mask mandate for schools on Thursday. However, the governor's office says the ruling only applies to schools within the Catholic Diocese of Covington.
In Jason Oswald, et al. v. Beshear, the plaintiffs challenged the legality of the Executive order issued by Beshear on August 10 requiring all teachers, staff, students, and visitors in Kentucky schools to wear face masks indoors regardless of vaccination status. In judge William Bertelsman's analysis, he states the Governor violates KRS39A.090 (3), which is the product of House Bill 1, Senate Bill 1, Senate Bill 2, and House Joint Resolution 77, all passed by the Kentucky General Assembly in its 2021 session.
"The Executive Branch cannot simply ignore laws passed by the duly-elected representatives of the citizens of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Therein lies tyranny. If the citizens dislike the laws passed, the remedy lies with them, at the polls."
Crystal Staley, the Director of Communications in Governor Beshear's Office released the following statement:
"The federal courts ruling could place thousands of Kentucky children at risk and undoubtedly expose them to the most dangerous version of COVID-19 we have ever seen.
Read more: https://www.lex18.com/news/coronavirus/federal-judge-rules-gov-andy-beshear-violated-law-with-executive-mask-mandate
Gov. Beshear's action in the first Covid go round kept us from getting hit SO much worse. Rethuglicans took away those powers, and are trying to kill us all this time.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,511 posts)Me confused.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Im guessing the judges ruling is more expansive.
Initech
(100,081 posts)Jose Garcia
(2,598 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,011 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,196 posts)How are they gonna be Right-to-Lifers on abortion, but Freedom-to-Infect on COVID? Because you know it's going to happen.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,011 posts)Women have a right to choose what to do with their own bodies. Their bodies, their choice.
Anti-maskers & anti-vaxxers do not have a right to medically endanger children and others who CAN'T BE VACCINATED.
Other people's bodies, not their choice!
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)You know it's heading to that ... because Repukes.
Achilles Skye
(24 posts)women in their childbearing years are going to feel the full brunt of conservativism done unto them.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,011 posts)stillcool
(32,626 posts)he got a pretty penny from suing CNN, and whoever else. I think Mitch McConnell offered him some kind of job
ananda
(28,867 posts)???
onenote
(42,715 posts)The law in question, enacted by the state legislature over the governors veto, effectively limits the governors delegated authority to impose a mask or vaccination mandate without the prior approval of the legislature.
ananda
(28,867 posts)Hamlet
to my mind, though I am native here
And to the manner born, it is a custom
More honourd in the breach than the observance.
llashram
(6,265 posts)so far...
calimary
(81,323 posts)jaxexpat
(6,837 posts)It and it's twin, non-willful ignorance, have pretty well cornered the market on killing, for around 5000 yrs.
in2herbs
(2,945 posts)it was legal and even constitutional for courts to rule that masks were required for public health reasons. So why am I not seeing any judges basing masking decisions on this case law????
onenote
(42,715 posts)The case to which you refer, Jacobson v Massachusetts, upheld the constitutionality of a state law requiring vaccinations, not the authority of a court or executive to unilaterally impose a vaccination requirement. The reason the Kentucky Executive Order was enjoined is that the state legislature enacted, over the governors veto, legislation expressly limiting the governors delegated authority to mandate vaccinations.
The problem isnt with the judges ruling it is with the state legislatures enactment of an anti-vax law.