Supreme Court allows Texas' 6-week abortion ban to take effect
Source: Politico
The Supreme Court early Wednesday let a Texas state law take effect that allows private citizens to sue to uphold a ban on the procedure after six weeks of pregnancy.
The courts decision to not act on an emergency petition from Texas abortion clinics comes as the justices prepare to more broadly reconsider the right to an abortion it established almost 50 years ago. In May, justices agreed to review Mississippis ban on the procedure after 15 weeks of pregnancy a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 decision that legalized abortion nationwide. Those arguments are expected later this year, with a ruling in 2022.
Beyond outlawing abortion as early as six weeks into a pregnancy, the Texas law, signed in May, would deputize citizens to file civil suits against abortion providers or anyone who helps facilitate the procedure after six weeks, such as a person who drives a pregnant person to the clinic. Individuals found to have violated the law would have to pay $10,000 to the person who successfully brings such a suit a bounty abortion rights advocates warn will encourage harassment, intimidation and vigilantism.
The citizen enforcement scheme also made the law more difficult to challenge in court, and the Supreme Court's decision to side, for now, against the clinics is likely to encourage copycat bills in other states.
Read more: https://www.politico.com/news/2021/09/01/supreme-court-texas-abortion-ban-508275
Lovie777
(11,992 posts)and it proves that the 6 effed up republican judges are seriously wacked.
RandySF
(57,636 posts)vercetti2021
(10,150 posts)Sorry but after living here for all my life. I'm ready to leave. What's next? Transgender rights provoked? Transition therapy banned? They got women this time. But what's stopping them from getting us next?
Comfortably_Numb
(3,777 posts)redneck hell hole of a state. Retirement within this year then Im out. Id like to live out my last years in a blue state, where the governor doesnt pride himself on denying women autonomy over their own bodies, letting Texans freeze to death, denying its citizens reliable electricity, and cater to the Neanderthal mouth breathing right wing.
vercetti2021
(10,150 posts)I'm only 31, I could see myself in a blue state for the rest of my days.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,777 posts)to lie. These repubs are crushing voting rights and setting the table to run this state in perpetuity.
vercetti2021
(10,150 posts)What's to stop them from stripping rights from LGBTQ people? To halt all transition therapy in the state? They do that, I will have to leave. I will have zero choice.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,777 posts)vercetti2021
(10,150 posts)Unless he lives within cities like Austin or Dallas. I live in backward ass Amarillo.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,777 posts)The panhandle is a disturbingly thumper hell and hostile place, but you dont need me to tell you that. I fear that folks who live in civilized places cant imagine this redneck hell.
vercetti2021
(10,150 posts)My mom almost got ran off the road a few weeks ago because she had a sticker on her car that said. Trump lied, 600,000 people died. Old beat up POS truck tried to kill her. She's had a lot more bad interactions than I have. Due to the fact she's a woman. I've had run in's for sure, but that was before my transition started. I looked fucking scary with a beard and whatnot. Now? Well everything is drastically changing, I won't look so imitating.
Random Boomer
(4,159 posts)My father's family settled in Texas in the middle 1800s, but I got out as soon as I graduated from college (back in the 1970s). Even living in Austin wasn't enough incentive to stay.
Ironically, I now live in West Virginia. It's a sign of the depressing devolution of Texas that I'm still better off here than there.
hamsterjill
(15,214 posts)Im about four years from retirement and I hope that I dont have to live here then. Fed up and tired. Not to mention embarrassed by the stupidity.
vercetti2021
(10,150 posts)I'm ready to toss my Texan card in the fire and leave ASAP before they revoke LGBT rights and ban transition therapy for adults. Texas man is just as bad as fucking Florida man. Too big red states with the amount of dumbassry in it
Murphyb849
(569 posts)Decent human being in Texas is reporting their husband son and family dog for having an AB. And wait and see the droves of women to vote these people out. This was a deal breaker.
IcyPeas
(21,746 posts)And furry porn and various other NSFW tips.
https://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/53932/1/this-anti-abortion-whistleblowing-site-is-being-flooded-with-shrek-porn-texas
dalton99a
(81,068 posts)hamsterjill
(15,214 posts)Hey, I know a bunch of good little girls from the sixties who went to visit their aunties for a summer. Most of them are now Trumpers pushing this shit.
Random Boomer
(4,159 posts)This is the best way to get that law taken down -- call them out on their hypocrisy.
BigmanPigman
(51,432 posts)can kiss winning in 2024 Good-bye.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)What does that even mean? It's nonsensical alphabet-soup gibberish to me.
George II
(67,782 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,432 posts)and put an F where a C should have been. SCOTUS means the Supreme Court Of The United States.
GQP is the current version of GOP since Q-Anon has becomes their crazy "theorist".
I have seen both abbreviations on DU for a long time and thought others were familiar with them.
djacq
(1,633 posts)Roe v. Wade does have standing as long as it gets them across the confirmation finish line...
Afterwards,
They'll slowly chip away the law until there's nothing left.
Response to Polybius (Original post)
ExTex This message was self-deleted by its author.
in2herbs
(2,942 posts)significant changes to the judicial system, and I don't mean just appointing more federal judges. Any law this deprives one of their constitutional rights, whether it be for one second or forever, is an unconstitutional law. Don't patronize me by saying that the court didn't rule, they did by their silence.
Dan
(3,524 posts)Reporting someone falsely or whatever - resulting in fines to the tune of $10,000 is going to push some people over the edge.
Force some places out of business (rightly or wrongly).
Texas is inviting an internal Civil War.
Just because their government cant get it up - he is punishing women for his failure to perform.
twin_ghost
(435 posts)They can't ban interstate commerce.
IcyPeas
(21,746 posts)Bayard
(21,805 posts)That's not even 2 menstrual cycles. I don't know anyone who knew they were pregnant that soon.
I predict tons of backroom and self abortions again. Medieval.
bucolic_frolic
(42,676 posts)This is an anti-freedom bill, a crime against civilized society that will pit neighbors against neighbors. Snooping is now a legalized and financially rewarding profession that can be hacked from the hide of "sinners".
turbinetree
(24,632 posts)court being run by non other John Roberts, the same John Roberts that helped gut voting rights.....you think it is time to expand the US Supreme Court......next up on the right wing federalist society agenda, Medicare and Social Security....it is coming.....
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)Wait until Blue States open up $10,000 lawsuits on gun owners.
in2herbs
(2,942 posts)possessions and their job.
Just a question re the law: the court has never ruled on whether or not vasectomies are considered abortions. Should any guy getting a vasectomy be reported under this law and force the USSC to rule on this in conjunction with their R vs W decisions?
I know there are people on this site that are telling us to calm down, that all lthe USSC did was not rule on the issue. IMO they are ignoring the fact that by not outlawing the law, for however long it chooses, the USSC is approving the law. Women's lives are affected in both instances so stop trying to clarify their inaction to justify the inaction.
Biden better get his staff to working faster on making changes to the USSC or democracy is doomed.
Grins
(7,134 posts)Id make that bet.
FBaggins
(26,697 posts)The court didn't issue a denial of the emergency motion (which might have included a list of those who dissented)... it was just silent.
Technically - this leaves open the possibility of a "shadow docket" answer in the coming days. Perhaps there's a denial coming, but one of the dissenting justices is still writing a scathing dissent (the response to the emergency appeal was filed just a day or so ago). Or perhaps they intend to approve the emergency request but need a couple of days to write up the decision (there would almost have to be an explanation given that context).
erronis
(14,955 posts)Every male can be sued if his zygote doesn't produce an embryo with a detectable heart beat.
Perhaps Abbott no longer has cajones but a lot of texans swear by theirs.
bluestarone
(16,721 posts)The MAN responsible for the pregnancy PAYS 18 years of child support! I bet that law wouldn't last long.
Tumbulu
(6,267 posts)I dont know what people pay a woman these days to produce a child for them as a surrogate. But I bet it is at least 80k? So, why cant the man or the state - since it is the one forcing he woman to produce a ch8ld against her will- get sued for forcing surrogacy?
Bayard
(21,805 posts)But she'd have to get a court order to prove it was him, right? The court system will get totally bogged down.