Companies Stay Quiet on Texas' New Abortion Law
Source: New York Times
When Texas lawmakers advanced a restrictive voting rights bill this year, American Airlines and Dell Technologies, two of the states biggest employers, were early and vocal critics of the effort. But this week, as a law that prohibits most abortions after about six weeks took effect in Texas, both companies declined to comment on the measure.
...Two dozen major companies contacted by The New York Times on Friday either did not reply or declined to comment. Among those that would not say something were McDonalds, a sponsor of International Womens Day; PwC, a major supporter of diversity and inclusion efforts; and Coca-Cola and Delta Air Lines, which led a corporate backlash last year against a restrictive voting bill in Georgia, where they have their headquarters.
Many of the biggest employers in Texas, including AT&T, Oracle, McKesson and Phillips 66, declined to comment. Even companies that are quick to speak up on social issues, including Patagonia and Levis, did not say anything about the new law. And Catalyst, a nonprofit organization that teams up with big companies to build workplaces that work for women, declined to comment.
When all of these companies who participate in things like International Womens Day wont speak out on reproductive health care, it shows that they care about the bottom line, not what women need and want, said Lindsey Taylor Wood, chief executive of The Helm, a venture capital firm that funds female founders.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/03/business/companies-texas-sb8-abortion-law.html
These companies need to be dragged kicking and screaming into taking a stand through boycotts, protests outside their corporate headquarters, and more.
Can anybody post a list of email land phone contacts for Texas-based companies?
msongs
(67,460 posts)Lovie777
(12,356 posts)Oh right, they don't care.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)paleotn
(17,989 posts)niyad
(113,612 posts)least surprising.
50 Shades Of Blue
(10,064 posts)These companies all knew there was a good chance this would happen. They had plenty of time to prepare statements of support for women's rights. Their silence now speaks volumes. What it says is they might support some social issues, but they draw the line at supporting women's rights.
sagetea
(1,375 posts)MacKenzie should really use this to launch their own corporations make it competitive. Oprah too for that matter...All women with the money!
sage
PSPS
(13,620 posts)Plus, their billionaire owners/donors don't want to pay taxes.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)It's bad for business. I don't blame businesses for not getting involved.
maxrandb
(15,364 posts)They don't fund the American Taliban?
AYFKM?
cstanleytech
(26,334 posts)stopdiggin
(11,387 posts)there are plenty of consumers who won't go near a Chick-Fil-A or Hobby Lobby.
(love seeing corporate activism - when they're plugging my issues - but the poster is absolutely correct in saying it's a move with consequences, and sometimes penalties - and a lot of corporations would rather not play)
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)a moral compass. It is meaningless to me as to what American Airlines or Dell thinks.
Polybius
(15,507 posts)Why state your political views when 45-55% of your fans will disagree with you.
VarryOn
(2,343 posts)After all, they would mostly be disagreeable!
cstanleytech
(26,334 posts)but in the end they truly only care about profits.
rso
(2,273 posts)Actually, the backlash has started. Both Lyft and Uber have promised to cover the legal costs of any drivers who get sued, and Lyft donated 1 million bucks to Planned Parenthood. In addition, GoDaddy has said it will refuse to do business with the fanatics. Hopefully its the start of a major corporate backlash.
Also, today, a Texas District Judge placed a two week injunction on the enforcement of the law, pending a hearing in two weeks time.
ZonkerHarris
(24,264 posts)turbinetree
(24,726 posts)going into the state to play, and they should not be allowed to go out of state to play other teams....with there silence they are condoning what that state does to another human being rights to privacy, and the simple fact that greed over rides privacy with their non action......they are in essence supporting vigilante justice...
ancianita
(36,157 posts)national optics of bad press, and so they're quiet. They are not hurt so much by boycotts.
You can type each of these into Wikipedia and get their location, name of CEO and then find a phone number on Google maps for them. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AT%26T
Here's a list of headquarters.
https://www.ranker.com/list/companies-headquartered-in-texas/the-working-man
Here are their deregulated untilities
Here are IT sector companies
All kinds of sectors exist in Texas. Most of the above companies are full of the people that voted for state house people who wrote and voted for the law, and people who voted for Democrats.
Who is going to drag a fictional personhood kicking and screaming into taking a stand? Their share holders? Employees? Worldwide consumers?
The best we can do is look the state house people up on donation sites like Open Secrets and see which companies' $$ they get, which companies donate to which persons, maybe correlate those companies' donations with other donations they make in other anti-abortion states to see if they show an abortion stance pattern. There's also On The Issues, where the interactive map gives state house members' positions. https://www.ontheissues.org/states/TX_Abortion.htm
AllaN01Bear
(18,527 posts)ancianita
(36,157 posts)Last edited Sat Sep 4, 2021, 10:36 PM - Edit history (1)
The reality is in the donor class of the Republicans in Texas' state house.
If money is speech, those companies never stay quiet in Texas or any other states these companies are trying to turn red. They're all dirty and need to wake up to see how the end of democratic majority rule is better for business than any other model they don't like -- because women make and spend and invest money.