Manchin: I will not vote for $3.5 trillion bill
Source: CNN
(CNN)Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin said Sunday he will not support the $3.5 trillion price tag for the economic bill that would expand the nation's social safety net, suggesting he preferred $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion for this bill.
" (Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer) will not have my vote on $3.5 (trillion) and Chuck knows that, and we've talked about this," the West Virginia senator told CNN's Dana Bash on "State of the Union."
"We've already put out $5.4 trillion and we've tried to help Americans in every way we possibly can and a lot of the help that we've put out there is still there and it's going to run clear until next year, 2022, so what's the urgency? What's the urgency that we have? It's not the same urgency that we had with the American Rescue Plan. We got that out the door quickly. That was about $2 trillion dollars."
The spending bill proposed by Biden and his allies in Congress spreads the spending out over 10 years as opposed to the Covid stimulus plans that Manchin referred to, which were more immediate injections of cash.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/12/politics/joe-manchin-democratic-bill-3-trillion-climate-provisions/index.html
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
bucolic_frolic
(43,161 posts)Infrastructure now, social support at the bottom end permanently, the rest slowly over time.
jimfields33
(15,793 posts)I just think states will have a hard time distributing funding even to contractors. Look at how difficult states are having giving out rental assistant money.
Rebl2
(13,501 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Look at how difficult states are having giving out rental assistant money..."
It does not follow. Sigh.
jimfields33
(15,793 posts)olegramps
(8,200 posts)If they are coupled with a reasonable taxation of the extremely wealthy and the drastic concentration of wealth that has taken place it is easily manageable. The fact of the matter is that the Republican Party's successful attack on the unions has enriched them at the expense of the working class. It has lead to the stagnation of wages and no power for which the workers have allowed themselves to be placed. The workers bought the Republicans propaganda campaign of the fraudulent Right to Work Laws and find themselves without health care, no pensions and minimal wages. Apathy results in servitude.
no_hypocrisy
(46,100 posts)Stick to your guns!
From January, 2021: https://www.businessinsider.com/joe-manchin-trillion-infrastructure-spending-congress-stimulus-2021-1
FBaggins
(26,735 posts)They spent 1.9 trillion shortly after that and the senate has passed another trillion (depending on how you score it) and now hes saying that another 1-1.5 would get his support. Depending on whether you count the infrastructure bill as 1 trillion or just half that amount (because it isnt all new dollars) - hes essentially right where he was in January.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,611 posts)Dont listen to a word he says, just watch what he does.
Hes trying to craft a media narrative to get the committees who are drafting the text of the bill to cut it down before it even gets to the floor, and to soften support from the other Blue Dogs. He is hoping to avoid being in the hot seat when Schumer brings the finalized bill up for debate and amendments.
I dont think Manchin has the guts to single handedly destroy Bidens agenda, and if the rest of the Dems stay united, he will fold.
Irish_Dem
(47,052 posts)Makes sense.
Do you think the other Dems will stay united?
Fiendish Thingy
(15,611 posts)A lot of money can change hands in the next few weeks before the bill comes to the floor.
Irish_Dem
(47,052 posts)I think Manchin is blowing some hot air.
Maybe he has to convince his handlers he is doing something.
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,021 posts)That's the cue I'm following...
Irish_Dem
(47,052 posts)When they start looking worried, then I will get worried too.
CrispyQ
(36,464 posts)MSNBC unearths clip of Joe Manchin calling for up to $4 trillion in infrastructure spending
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/9/9/2051316/-MSNBC-unearths-clip-of-Joe-Manchin-calling-for-up-to-4-trillion-in-infrastructure-spending
snip...
MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan recently unearthed a clip in which Manchin endorsed, all on his lonesome, an appropriately robust infrastructure investmentup to $4 trillion. And strangely enough, at the time, he wasnt worried about inflation so much as the significant opportunity costs of not passing meaningful infrastructure legislation.
Anon-C
(3,430 posts)Jon King
(1,910 posts)He absolutely seeks out every camera and interview he can. But if his nonsense causes the Dems to lose the House, he will have zero influence anymore.
Magoo48
(4,709 posts)and, certainly does not fit.
hedda_foil
(16,373 posts)vercetti2021
(10,156 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,962 posts)Hurricane Ida remnants in West Virginia -
https://www.wboy.com/news/storm-recap-ida-remnants-in-north-central-west-virginia/
Link to tweet
TEXT
@NWSCharlestonWV
Rainfall amounts over the past 24 hours exceeded 3" with some local 4" amounts in a stripe from Logan County, WV northeastward to Preston County, WV. A band of 2 to 3" rainfall also fell over SE Ohio. Otherwise, amounts were in the 1-2" range.
#wvwx #ohwx #kywx #vawx
Image
1:45 PM · Sep 1, 2021
Link to tweet
TEXT
@meteojoewowk
More significant flooding in Clay County, this time over at H.E. White Elementary School in Bomont. Most of that play equipment for the kiddos is new with it being destroyed in 2016. Photos courtesy of Angela Hizer Miller. @SpencerWeather @NWSCharlestonWV @bryanweather #wvwx
Image
Image
Image
Image
12:06 PM · Sep 1, 2021
Link to tweet
TEXT
@meteojoewowk
The road behind the Clay Tudors is washed out as a result of floodwaters along Upper Two Run. Video courtesy of Aiden Taylor. What are you seeing in your neighborhood? #wvwx @SpencerWeather @bryanweather @NWSCharlestonWV
11:37 AM · Sep 1, 2021
Link to tweet
TEXT
@BobAaronWCHS
Flooding in Buckhannon. #EyewitnessWV
Image
Image
Image
11:20 AM · Sep 1, 2021
Climate change = more and more of these types of weather events, with more enhanced rainfall and more severe convective complexes.
TiberiusB
(487 posts)Despite what the apology brigade moaning that everything is a smear campaign to bring down Manchin believes, the man clearly is compromised when it comes to certain industries, coal among them.
BumRushDaShow
(128,962 posts)that excessive flooding can pretty much kill those mines, especially if you get an "apps runner" tropical storm like Ida that pumped out a lot of rain. The overtopping of any mine waste pits can seep the stuff into the ground water and eventually into the well water of residents who use wells.
The Charleston, WV NWS office said they really dodged a bullet (despite the flooding they did get) but TS Nicholas is now here as of this morning, so we'll see where that will go.
Link to tweet
TEXT
@NHC_Atlantic
Here are the 10 AM CDT Sunday Key Messages for newly formed Tropical Storm #Nicholas. Follow the latest at http://hurricanes.gov
Image
Image
11:13 AM · Sep 12, 2021
Bayard
(22,069 posts)Or get the hell out of the way.
Manchin is always in the limelight with his bullshit. Where does Sinema stand now?
Deminpenn
(15,286 posts)This is admittedly a somewhat diminishing read. But Manchin clearly likes the limelight and he doesnt pretend to be an ideologue. If you use this framework all the various shifts and turns start to make sense. Manchin is the quintessential Washington player, very much a creature of Washington insider culture with all its shibboleths and conventional wisdoms.
There's also some good stuff about Mark Penn and "No Labels" being his creation.
Crowman2009
(2,495 posts)Oh that's right! You're all going: *crickets* *crickets*
GB_RN
(2,355 posts)Unlike the other stimulus bills, this bill calls for the $3.5 trillion spent over 10 years. His statements - at other times - that he's worried about inflation being caused by this bill are...disingenuous...at best.
Response to demmiblue (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
mathematic
(1,439 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)why teh Party treats him like shit after they increase their margin of majoirty,,O!
IbogaProject
(2,811 posts)He is stuck with investments in Coal, so he wants nothing that will compete with coal. Green energy is his enemy.
turbinetree
(24,695 posts)Wolf Frankula
(3,600 posts)Your constituents want it. Vote for it.
Wolf
whistler162
(11,155 posts)of condo owners in Miami said!
bdamomma
(63,849 posts)and doing what the Koch Bros want him to do. What an ass he is!
jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)representation at all in places like West Virginia.....
Can you please explain to me how his vote would be any different if Manchin actually were a Republican?
Is it really that important to have someone with a (D) next to their name, even if that (D) stands for nothing other than duplicity????
drray23
(7,627 posts)If you have the majority in the senate, you can set the agenda, decide which bills get to the floor, chair the committees. It's not just about the voting. How hard is that to understand ?
jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)....it actually is hard to understand. I mean, what the fuck good are people like that? Where's the loyalty and solidarity?
Manchump might have said "I do" to the Democratic party, but he sure does love to run off to some sleazy motel with the reThugs every chance he gets.
FBaggins
(26,735 posts)You can't think of anything that has occurred in the last eight months that would have been different with majority leader McConnell vs Schumer?
Not anything at all?
honest.abe
(8,678 posts)The Senate majority leader has tremendous power in setting the agenda and determining what comes to a vote. Recall McConnel blocking the Garland vote for SCOTUS at the end of the Obama Presidency. And then forcing the vote on Amy Coney Barrett at the last minute of the Trump administration. Those two events will change this country for decades.
Also, FYI, Manchin has voted with the Democrats and Biden on every vote brought to the floor this year. A Republican replacement would surely not have done that.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=15848156
AncientOfDays
(163 posts)The $3.5T is over 10 years - or $350B per year - we give more than twice that to the Pentagon - and for what?