Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(36,850 posts)
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 09:58 AM Sep 2021

Manchin: I will not vote for $3.5 trillion bill

Source: CNN

(CNN)Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin said Sunday he will not support the $3.5 trillion price tag for the economic bill that would expand the nation's social safety net, suggesting he preferred $1 trillion to $1.5 trillion for this bill.

" (Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer) will not have my vote on $3.5 (trillion) and Chuck knows that, and we've talked about this," the West Virginia senator told CNN's Dana Bash on "State of the Union."

"We've already put out $5.4 trillion and we've tried to help Americans in every way we possibly can and a lot of the help that we've put out there is still there and it's going to run clear until next year, 2022, so what's the urgency? What's the urgency that we have? It's not the same urgency that we had with the American Rescue Plan. We got that out the door quickly. That was about $2 trillion dollars."

The spending bill proposed by Biden and his allies in Congress spreads the spending out over 10 years as opposed to the Covid stimulus plans that Manchin referred to, which were more immediate injections of cash.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/09/12/politics/joe-manchin-democratic-bill-3-trillion-climate-provisions/index.html






41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manchin: I will not vote for $3.5 trillion bill (Original Post) demmiblue Sep 2021 OP
I still think a compromise will be reached bucolic_frolic Sep 2021 #1
Even 2 trillion between two bills is a lot of money. jimfields33 Sep 2021 #7
Got that right Rebl2 Sep 2021 #23
It does not follow LanternWaste Sep 2021 #30
Awesome response. jimfields33 Sep 2021 #33
People should not forget these expenditures are over a ten year period. Hardly catastrophic. olegramps Sep 2021 #19
Joe, you're correct. You said you'd vote for a *Four Trillion Dollar* package. no_hypocrisy Sep 2021 #2
Note that this wouldn't be a change FBaggins Sep 2021 #5
Manchin is simply repeating what he wrote a week ago Fiendish Thingy Sep 2021 #3
I thought we were being manipulated by wasn't sure how. Thanks for your explanation. Irish_Dem Sep 2021 #6
I think the odds are in our favor, but wouldn't bet the farm on it Fiendish Thingy Sep 2021 #11
I am having the same feeling. I am not counting out Biden yet. Irish_Dem Sep 2021 #13
Biden and Schumer do not seem worried AZSkiffyGeek Sep 2021 #40
Exactly. Irish_Dem Sep 2021 #41
A DU thread from yesterday: CrispyQ Sep 2021 #4
Go to blazes, Joe Manchin. Anon-C Sep 2021 #8
He craves attention. Jon King Sep 2021 #9
He's a self-serving putz and not a team player, possibly a plant, way right of "moderate", Magoo48 Sep 2021 #21
This is why.. He owns a coal company! hedda_foil Sep 2021 #10
Hey Manchin vercetti2021 Sep 2021 #12
"so what's the urgency?" BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #14
His voting record on the environment is pretty bad TiberiusB Sep 2021 #25
Well little does he know BumRushDaShow Sep 2021 #26
Get with the program, Senator, Bayard Sep 2021 #15
Jmho, but Josh Marshall has the correct take Deminpenn Sep 2021 #16
Hey Manchin defenders! Where are you now? Crowman2009 Sep 2021 #17
This Is Not $3.5 Trillion All At Once... GB_RN Sep 2021 #18
Message auto-removed Name removed Sep 2021 #20
He didn't. You should delete your post now that you know it's wrong. nt mathematic Sep 2021 #22
And he will sit around wondering,,,, Cryptoad Sep 2021 #24
His coal investments IbogaProject Sep 2021 #27
So does anyone know if the coal companies are still getting a $7.50 per ton tax break.... turbinetree Sep 2021 #28
Again: Joe, West Virginia voters need this bill Wolf Frankula Sep 2021 #29
Sounds similar to what a group whistler162 Sep 2021 #31
He's saying bdamomma Sep 2021 #32
For those who still believe that having Democrats like Manchump is better than having no Democratic jcmaine72 Sep 2021 #34
yes it is very important drray23 Sep 2021 #35
Well, if members of that so-called majority side with the minority and empower them instead.... jcmaine72 Sep 2021 #36
Seriously? FBaggins Sep 2021 #37
You clearly dont understand the mechanics of how the Senate operates. honest.abe Sep 2021 #38
Perspective AncientOfDays Sep 2021 #39

bucolic_frolic

(43,161 posts)
1. I still think a compromise will be reached
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:01 AM
Sep 2021

Infrastructure now, social support at the bottom end permanently, the rest slowly over time.

jimfields33

(15,793 posts)
7. Even 2 trillion between two bills is a lot of money.
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:29 AM
Sep 2021

I just think states will have a hard time distributing funding even to contractors. Look at how difficult states are having giving out rental assistant money.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
30. It does not follow
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 06:29 PM
Sep 2021

"Look at how difficult states are having giving out rental assistant money..."

It does not follow. Sigh.

olegramps

(8,200 posts)
19. People should not forget these expenditures are over a ten year period. Hardly catastrophic.
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:45 AM
Sep 2021

If they are coupled with a reasonable taxation of the extremely wealthy and the drastic concentration of wealth that has taken place it is easily manageable. The fact of the matter is that the Republican Party's successful attack on the unions has enriched them at the expense of the working class. It has lead to the stagnation of wages and no power for which the workers have allowed themselves to be placed. The workers bought the Republicans propaganda campaign of the fraudulent Right to Work Laws and find themselves without health care, no pensions and minimal wages. Apathy results in servitude.

FBaggins

(26,735 posts)
5. Note that this wouldn't be a change
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:17 AM
Sep 2021

They “spent” 1.9 trillion shortly after that… and the senate has passed another trillion (depending on how you score it) and now he’s saying that another 1-1.5 would get his support. Depending on whether you count the infrastructure bill as 1 trillion or just half that amount (because it isn’t all new dollars) - he’s essentially right where he was in January.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,611 posts)
3. Manchin is simply repeating what he wrote a week ago
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:04 AM
Sep 2021

Don’t listen to a word he says, just watch what he does.

He’s trying to craft a media narrative to get the committees who are drafting the text of the bill to cut it down before it even gets to the floor, and to soften support from the other Blue Dogs. He is hoping to avoid being in the hot seat when Schumer brings the finalized bill up for debate and amendments.

I don’t think Manchin has the guts to single handedly destroy Biden’s agenda, and if the rest of the Dems stay united, he will fold.

Irish_Dem

(47,052 posts)
6. I thought we were being manipulated by wasn't sure how. Thanks for your explanation.
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:21 AM
Sep 2021

Makes sense.

Do you think the other Dems will stay united?

Fiendish Thingy

(15,611 posts)
11. I think the odds are in our favor, but wouldn't bet the farm on it
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:57 AM
Sep 2021

A lot of money can change hands in the next few weeks before the bill comes to the floor.

Irish_Dem

(47,052 posts)
13. I am having the same feeling. I am not counting out Biden yet.
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:02 AM
Sep 2021

I think Manchin is blowing some hot air.

Maybe he has to convince his handlers he is doing something.

CrispyQ

(36,464 posts)
4. A DU thread from yesterday:
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:04 AM
Sep 2021
https://democraticunderground.com/100215845909

MSNBC unearths clip of Joe Manchin calling for up to $4 trillion in infrastructure spending

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2021/9/9/2051316/-MSNBC-unearths-clip-of-Joe-Manchin-calling-for-up-to-4-trillion-in-infrastructure-spending

snip...

MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan recently unearthed a clip in which Manchin endorsed, all on his lonesome, an appropriately robust infrastructure investment—up to $4 trillion. And strangely enough, at the time, he wasn’t worried about inflation so much as the significant opportunity costs of not passing meaningful infrastructure legislation.

Jon King

(1,910 posts)
9. He craves attention.
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 10:55 AM
Sep 2021

He absolutely seeks out every camera and interview he can. But if his nonsense causes the Dems to lose the House, he will have zero influence anymore.

Magoo48

(4,709 posts)
21. He's a self-serving putz and not a team player, possibly a plant, way right of "moderate",
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 12:14 PM
Sep 2021

and, certainly does not fit.

BumRushDaShow

(128,962 posts)
14. "so what's the urgency?"
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:04 AM
Sep 2021

Hurricane Ida remnants in West Virginia -

https://www.wboy.com/news/storm-recap-ida-remnants-in-north-central-west-virginia/




TEXT

NWS Charleston, WV
@NWSCharlestonWV
Rainfall amounts over the past 24 hours exceeded 3" with some local 4" amounts in a stripe from Logan County, WV northeastward to Preston County, WV. A band of 2 to 3" rainfall also fell over SE Ohio. Otherwise, amounts were in the 1-2" range.

#wvwx #ohwx #kywx #vawx
Image
1:45 PM · Sep 1, 2021





TEXT

Joe Fitzwater
@meteojoewowk
More significant flooding in Clay County, this time over at H.E. White Elementary School in Bomont. Most of that play equipment for the kiddos is new with it being destroyed in 2016. Photos courtesy of Angela Hizer Miller. @SpencerWeather @NWSCharlestonWV @bryanweather #wvwx
Image
Image
Image
Image
12:06 PM · Sep 1, 2021





TEXT

Joe Fitzwater
@meteojoewowk
The road behind the Clay Tudor’s is washed out as a result of floodwaters along Upper Two Run. Video courtesy of Aiden Taylor. What are you seeing in your neighborhood? #wvwx @SpencerWeather @bryanweather @NWSCharlestonWV
11:37 AM · Sep 1, 2021





TEXT

Bob Aaron
@BobAaronWCHS
Flooding in Buckhannon. #EyewitnessWV
Image
Image
Image
11:20 AM · Sep 1, 2021


Climate change = more and more of these types of weather events, with more enhanced rainfall and more severe convective complexes.

TiberiusB

(487 posts)
25. His voting record on the environment is pretty bad
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 01:07 PM
Sep 2021
https://scorecard.lcv.org/moc/joe-manchin-iii

Despite what the apology brigade moaning that everything is a smear campaign to bring down Manchin believes, the man clearly is compromised when it comes to certain industries, coal among them.

BumRushDaShow

(128,962 posts)
26. Well little does he know
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 01:55 PM
Sep 2021

that excessive flooding can pretty much kill those mines, especially if you get an "apps runner" tropical storm like Ida that pumped out a lot of rain. The overtopping of any mine waste pits can seep the stuff into the ground water and eventually into the well water of residents who use wells.

The Charleston, WV NWS office said they really dodged a bullet (despite the flooding they did get) but TS Nicholas is now here as of this morning, so we'll see where that will go.




TEXT

National Hurricane Center
@NHC_Atlantic
Here are the 10 AM CDT Sunday Key Messages for newly formed Tropical Storm #Nicholas. Follow the latest at http://hurricanes.gov
Image
Image
11:13 AM · Sep 12, 2021






Bayard

(22,069 posts)
15. Get with the program, Senator,
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:12 AM
Sep 2021

Or get the hell out of the way.

Manchin is always in the limelight with his bullshit. Where does Sinema stand now?

Deminpenn

(15,286 posts)
16. Jmho, but Josh Marshall has the correct take
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:19 AM
Sep 2021
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/joe-manchin-dc-insider-culture-and-the-long-derply-hand-of-mark-penn



So we have all these theories: Manchin is a crypto-Republican; he’s doing the work of his funders; he and Biden have a secret understanding and it’s all going to work out. My own theory is a bit different. It’s not even my theory. Someone mentioned it to me several months ago. But I can’t remember who. The theory is this: all of Manchin’s actions hold together and make sense if you imagine he got up on a particular day, absorbed the CW of the moment and said the first or second thing that came into his head.

This is admittedly a somewhat diminishing read. But Manchin clearly likes the limelight and he doesn’t pretend to be an ideologue. If you use this framework all the various shifts and turns start to make sense. Manchin is the quintessential Washington player, very much a creature of Washington insider culture with all its shibboleths and conventional wisdoms.


There's also some good stuff about Mark Penn and "No Labels" being his creation.

GB_RN

(2,355 posts)
18. This Is Not $3.5 Trillion All At Once...
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 11:38 AM
Sep 2021

Unlike the other stimulus bills, this bill calls for the $3.5 trillion spent over 10 years. His statements - at other times - that he's worried about inflation being caused by this bill are...disingenuous...at best.

Response to demmiblue (Original post)

Cryptoad

(8,254 posts)
24. And he will sit around wondering,,,,
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 12:34 PM
Sep 2021

why teh Party treats him like shit after they increase their margin of majoirty,,O!

IbogaProject

(2,811 posts)
27. His coal investments
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 04:57 PM
Sep 2021

He is stuck with investments in Coal, so he wants nothing that will compete with coal. Green energy is his enemy.

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
34. For those who still believe that having Democrats like Manchump is better than having no Democratic
Sun Sep 12, 2021, 09:44 PM
Sep 2021

representation at all in places like West Virginia.....

Can you please explain to me how his vote would be any different if Manchin actually were a Republican?

Is it really that important to have someone with a (D) next to their name, even if that (D) stands for nothing other than duplicity????


drray23

(7,627 posts)
35. yes it is very important
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 12:03 AM
Sep 2021

If you have the majority in the senate, you can set the agenda, decide which bills get to the floor, chair the committees. It's not just about the voting. How hard is that to understand ?

jcmaine72

(1,773 posts)
36. Well, if members of that so-called majority side with the minority and empower them instead....
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 05:14 AM
Sep 2021

....it actually is hard to understand. I mean, what the fuck good are people like that? Where's the loyalty and solidarity?

Manchump might have said "I do" to the Democratic party, but he sure does love to run off to some sleazy motel with the reThugs every chance he gets.

FBaggins

(26,735 posts)
37. Seriously?
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 08:01 AM
Sep 2021

You can't think of anything that has occurred in the last eight months that would have been different with majority leader McConnell vs Schumer?

Not anything at all?

honest.abe

(8,678 posts)
38. You clearly dont understand the mechanics of how the Senate operates.
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 10:07 AM
Sep 2021

The Senate majority leader has tremendous power in setting the agenda and determining what comes to a vote. Recall McConnel blocking the Garland vote for SCOTUS at the end of the Obama Presidency. And then forcing the vote on Amy Coney Barrett at the last minute of the Trump administration. Those two events will change this country for decades.

Also, FYI, Manchin has voted with the Democrats and Biden on every vote brought to the floor this year. A Republican replacement would surely not have done that.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=15848156

AncientOfDays

(163 posts)
39. Perspective
Mon Sep 13, 2021, 02:17 PM
Sep 2021

The $3.5T is over 10 years - or $350B per year - we give more than twice that to the Pentagon - and for what?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Manchin: I will not vote ...