An F.D.A. panel recommended against approving a Pfizer-BioNTech booster for people 16 and older.
Source: New York Times
WASHINGTON A scientific advisory committee to the Food and Drug Administration on Friday overwhelmingly recommended against approving a booster shot of the Pfizer-BioNTech coronavirus vaccine for people 16 and older.
The committee voted 16 to 3 after holding an intense daylong public discussion on whether booster shots are necessary and if so, for whom. The Biden administration has been hoping the F.D.A. would approve a third shot of the Pfizer vaccine in time to begin rolling out boosters for Pfizer recipients next week.
The vote came after a sharp debate in which many of the panels independent experts, including infectious disease doctors and statisticians, challenged whether the data justified a broad rollout of extra shots when the vaccines appear to still offer robust protection against severe Covid-19 disease and hospitalization, at least in the United States.
Its unclear that everyone needs to be boosted, other than a subset of the population that clearly would be at high risk for serious disease, said Dr. Michael G. Kurilla, a committee member and official at the National Institutes of Health.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/09/17/us/politics/fda-booster-shots-meeting-covid.html
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,833 posts)there was an "extra" NO vote in the little applet vote they use.
Response to Zorro (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
durablend
(7,460 posts)Then "Oh shit, maybe we should've done something"
LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)The same can also probably be said about the CDC too. If love to know what reasoning they are using during a time when the pandemic is blowing up virtually everywhere and the vaccine creators are recommending boosters of their drugs.
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,005 posts)When the vast majority of the world hasn't had a single jab.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,005 posts)It's whether the boost is enough to justify it when the vaccinated are still not at particularly high risk of hospitalization/death, and when there are so many unvaccinated spreading worldwide that don't have access to their first shot.
Should we delay giving kids their jabs because adults want a third dose?
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)There are so many doses of vaccine in the US being thrown away because they have expired, I seriously doubt third jabs are going to create a threat of scarcity. As far as global vaccinations - most poor countries lack the storage and distribution facilities for the US vaccines. Thats why Astra Zeneca is the vaccine of choice outside of the US.
I suspect this wont be a simple yes or no answer. If I had to guess, I would guess third jabs will go to the over 60 crowd first for obvious reasons.
Finally, I live in Idaho and we are swimming in vaccines yet our vaccination numbers have remained flat for months because of the huge number of redneck Trumpers who think staying unvaccinated proves their loyalty to TFG.
So like I said, its complicated.
musclecar6
(1,685 posts)That one way national disgrace wouldnt piss on those rednecks if they were on fire. Complete morons.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)They think the sun shines out his arsehole. Go figure
padfun
(1,786 posts)Don't they have more than one dose? If not, maybe they should ask for more supply.
Clagfarble
(3 posts)?
marble falls
(57,075 posts)... makes me think that herd immunity has to be brought up to a higher percentage that it was thought and as quickly as possible.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)US is leading the world in the number of infections.