A Federal Judge Blocks A Vaccine Mandate For NYC Teachers
Source: NPR
NEW YORK New York City schools have been temporarily blocked from enforcing a vaccine mandate for teachers and other workers by a federal appeals judge just days before it was to take effect. The worker mandate for the nation's largest school system was set to go into effect Monday. But late Friday, a judge for the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted a temporary injunction and referred the case to a three-judge panel on an expedited basis.
Department of Education spokesperson Danielle Filson said officials are seeking a speedy resolution by the circuit court next week. "We're confident our vaccine mandate will continue to be upheld once all the facts have been presented, because that is the level of protection our students and staff deserve," Filson said in an email.
She said more than 82% of department employees have been vaccinated. While most school workers have been vaccinated, unions representing New York City principals and teachers warned that could still leave the 1 million student school system short of as many as 10,000 teachers, along with other staffers, such as cafeteria workers and school police officers.
New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio has resisted calls to delay the mandate.
Read more: https://www.npr.org/sections/coronavirus-live-updates/2021/09/25/1040699321/nyc-teachers-vaccine-mandate-judge-blocks-schools
Short article and just heard this on the radio.
PSPS
(13,608 posts)PortTack
(32,785 posts)See Jacobson vs Massachusetts
BumRushDaShow
(129,280 posts)just a 3-judge panel to decide initially (which I think is standard practice). If whatever they decide is appealed with a request to have en banc review, then the full court will look at it.
brooklynite
(94,668 posts)NotHardly
(1,062 posts)I am now beginning to entertain the idea that Republicans simply want to kill as many people as possible, their own, and the rest of us are just collateral.
LastLiberal in PalmSprings
(12,588 posts)... the more they stay the same (not really -- the little girl is welcomed in the bottom picture).
2021
oldsoftie
(12,582 posts)And of COURSE its in NYC.
If they prevail, then anyone else can sue to get rid of their mandates as well.
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)to require vaccines. This has resulted in huge increases in the numbers of people vaccinated.
This is a request to delay the mandate so schools can stay open.
But go ahead. Let that knee jerk and blame the union. RepubliQans love it when we do that.
If the mandate WAS enforced right now and schools DID have to close, I'm sure that would be the union's fault too.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)But negotiations continue over what will happen to teachers who arent vaccinated and dont have a religious or medical exemption.
...
Its unclear what the city or union have proposed would happen if teachers refuse to be vaccinated. The union did not respond to questions about whether its leaders would support removing those staffers from the payroll. Los Angeles and Chicago, the second and third largest school districts behind New York City, have made the vaccines mandatory for teachers to continue working.
brooklynite
(94,668 posts)Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)could be opposed.
Based on current vaccination rates it looks like enforcement of the policy could result in the firing of thousands of employees covered by the contract(s).
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)which would mean closing classrooms, overcrowding classrooms and putting kids at risk that way, possibly closing some schools, I'm sure the posters who are blaming the union for this requested extension would blame the union for the closures too.
You can't keep the schools from chaos and overcrowding of classrooms AND enforce the mandate this coming Monday. You can't have both. They are trying to extend the deadline so they can avoid either of these situations.
Do you have a better idea?
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)organization with about the same number of people in it as the population of the city of Dallas, though the NYC Dept of Education is a lot more diverse.
But the NYC Dept of Education should have had everything all squared away within the week after the vaccine was approved.
And because they didn't, let's all trash the union.
And you didn't answer my question: do you have a better idea? I don't.
AZLD4Candidate
(5,738 posts)Why are we bringing it here? The ONLY union that deserves this treatment are the police unions that willfully and brazenly shield and protect bad cops.
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Deserves a bit of stick on the subject.
AZLD4Candidate
(5,738 posts)Keep at it.
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Requiring them to be vaccinated against a deadly disease that can kill children seems like a low bar for employment.
Lucky Luciano
(11,258 posts)NickB79
(19,257 posts)It's weak as hell.
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)the moment the FDA approved Pfizer and the Dept of Education could legally compel employees to be vaccinated.
No one in the union is arguing against vaccination mandates.
The union, right now, is trying to extend the vaccine deadline which is due to take effect on Monday.
The vaccination rate in teachers and staff has risen sharply since the mandate was announced.
But there are still enough unvaxed employees that if it were enacted on Monday, classrooms would have to close, causing overcrowding in the remaining classrooms and putting children at risk that way. Some schools would have to shut down. It would cause general chaos.
The union's position is that it wants to see an extension of the deadline in order to keep kids in school but get more people vaccinated.
Do you have a better plan?
NickB79
(19,257 posts)The FDA approved Pfizer over a month ago.
It's available and free EVERYWHERE.
Anyone who really wanted the shot could have had one by now. This isn't about getting "more time". It's about antivaxxers trying their damnedest to not get the shot AT ALL.
But fine. Let's extend it a week or two. Then what? Another extension? Another? Any hard line will eventually cause chaos, because a solid 20% of the US population is so brainwashed that they're willing to lose their job rather than get the vaccine.
The longer we kick the can down the road, the more people get infected.
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)They are not the vast majority of teachers. But the union and all the teachers are being bashed in this thread because of it.
The position of the union is to attempt to provide the greatest safety for faculty and kids.
Their position is that, given the large numbers of people who have gotten the vaccine since the mandate was announced, pushing out the deadline a few more weeks will get even more people vaccinated, and will reduce the need to put the kids through even more chaos than they have been subjected to for the past two years.
Enforcing the mandate on Monday will cause classrooms and possibly entire schools to shut down, which will put the kids and the faculties in danger due to overcrowding.
I totally support the union's position.
And again, do you have a better idea?
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)including DU.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)You are either with us, or against us
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or_against_us
oldsoftie
(12,582 posts)You should read the New Yorker report, among others, on the NYC teachers unions and who THEY protect. The New Yorker is hardly Brietbart
Here's a hint; very little difference between the 2 unions & protecting bad seeds.
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)uninformed knee-jerk.
I would not have expected to see this nonsense here.
oldsoftie
(12,582 posts)It was also covered by 60 Minutes years ago.
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)well aware of the way the press, usually led by the NY Post and other Murdoch rags, likes to completely misrepresent ALL of the union's activities. And yes, I do know how the press was portraying us "years ago." It was baseless then and it is baseless now.
It is a right wing misinformation campaign that, I see, has succeeded in making very deep inroads, even among those who should know better.
oldsoftie
(12,582 posts)They didnt, so it must not have been. And I'd hardly call 60 Minutes & the New Yorker anywhere near "murdoch rags".
The unions would far mroe support from the average citizen if they didnt work so hard to "protect" people who should be fired. But if you're a member of that union, I understand why you feel the way you do.
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)Last edited Mon Sep 27, 2021, 04:43 PM - Edit history (1)
I feel certain you are referring to the so called rubber rooms of the days gone by.
I will tell you the story of one of those terrible criminals who I know and who was in a rubber room: he was a middle school art teacher. He was working on a bulletin board. He pulled an exacto knife out of his art kit to make a cut in some construction paper. He made the cut, put the knife back in its plastic holder, put the holder into a zipped container. He was sent to the rubber room on the charge of "bringing a weapon to school." Art teachers routinely use exacto knives. He was sent because his principal didn't like him.
The rubber rooms were an invention of Bloomberg when he was trying to break the union. His administration placed people into them, and then alerted the press so that gullible people could be told of all the "criminals" the union was "protecting." Some dumbasses, both in and outside of the press, believed them. Much was made about how these "terrible criminals" spent years in those rooms at full pay. The fact was that the Bloomberg people didn't allow any hearings to take place.
If there had been any followup, or if the useful idiots who, apparently, STILL believe the codswallop they were fed, had seen fit to ask whatever happened with this terrible scandal, they would have found out the following: the minute Bloomberg was out and his Chancellor was replaced, the hearings on the rubber room denizens, which the Bloomberg administration had not allowed to take place for years, were finally allowed to happen. The vast, vast majority of those in the rooms were found to have not done anything wrong. A tiny percentage was fired for cause. The whole process of clearing out the rubber rooms, which were entirely for the benefit of the press in an effort to union-bust, took 3 months. That could have been done any time during Bloomberg's 12 years. He chose not to because he knew he could use the rooms to make stupid people believe that skulduggery was rampant among NYC teachers.
But there are still morons out there who bought the whole scam and see the whole episode as evidence of the monsters they just love to see lurking under their beds.
You can't fix stupid.
Scrivener7
(50,989 posts)be true?
That is really, really sad.
Polybius
(15,465 posts)Article didn't name him/her.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_F._Bianco
onenote
(42,729 posts)Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)Let the school district administration and the teacher's union have their day in court.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)teacher and "the class"...
Link to the lawsuit (.pdf):
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.469285/gov.uscourts.nyed.469285.1.0.pdf
of similarly situated individuals, by her attorneys, F&G Legal Group,...
Steelrolled
(2,022 posts)ZonkerHarris
(24,238 posts)This is bullshit law.
ZonkerHarris
(24,238 posts)here it is
so weak legally
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nyed.469285/gov.uscourts.nyed.469285.18.0.pdf
BumRushDaShow
(129,280 posts)Scanning their filing, it looks like they are referencing at least "due process" cases that IMHO don't even seem to apply.
It's a temporary injunction in order to have a 3-judge panel from the 2nd Circuit review the case (not the full court). And that is supposedly due to happen this Wednesday.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)The three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan issued a brief order late in the day that lifted a block of the mandate that a single appeals judge had put in place on Friday.
After an adverse ruling from a Brooklyn judge, a group of teachers had brought the case to the appeals court, which assigned a three-judge panel to hear oral arguments Wednesday. But the appeals panel issued its order Monday after written arguments were submitted by both sides.
Mayor Bill de Blasio announced in August that about 148,000 school employees would have to get at least a first dose of the COVID-19 vaccination by Sept. 27. The policy covers teachers, along with other staffers, such as custodians and cafeteria workers.
BumRushDaShow
(129,280 posts)Looks like that is a LBN candidate! I'll put it up now.