Biden officials finalize a rule making it harder to kill birds, reversing Trump
Source: Washington Post
The Biden administration finalized a rule Wednesday revoking a Trump administration policy that eased penalties for killing birds, restoring federal protections that had been in place for a century. The Trump administrations reinterpretation of the 1918 Migratory Bird Treaty Act ranked as one of its most contentious wildlife policies. It relaxed legal penalties for energy companies, construction firms and land developers that unintentionally killed birds through activities such as construction and oil drilling.
The new U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service rule would restore protections under the bedrock environmental law, which prohibits the take of migratory bird species regulatory-speak for hunting, killing, capturing, selling or otherwise hurting them. Trump officials had sought to exclude accidental deaths from the take definition, a move backed by the oil and gas industry. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland said the new rule would protect more birds threatened by the dual crises of climate change and habitat loss. She noted that the Fish and Wildlife Service officially declared the ivory-billed woodpecker extinct Wednesday, along with 22 other species that can no longer be found in the wild.
The specifics for each of the species' demise vary, but the story arc is essentially the same: Humans altered their habitat in a significant way, and we couldn't or didn't do enough to ultimately change the trajectory before it was too late, Haaland told reporters on a call Wednesday. But this moment, as sobering as it is, can serve as a wake-up call. Our children and grandchildren will not know the Earth as we do unless we change the status quo, said Haaland, who is on a trip to California and visited the San Diego National Wildlife Refuge on Tuesday.
The Biden administration will step up enforcement to ensure companies and individuals take precautions to avoid bird deaths in the future, officials said, and will develop a new policy after taking public comment. Mallori Miller, vice president of government relations at the Independent Petroleum Association of America, which represents small and midsize oil and gas companies, said the group was disappointed with the Biden administration's move to reverse the Trump policy.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2021/09/29/migratory-bird-treaty-act-biden/
These are the types of things that are going on "behind the scenes" where Congress can generally pass resolutions that dissolve Rules changes, and then replacements can be put in place through the usual Federal Register process if needed.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,106 posts)kill Women in back alleys (stay tuned, Roe is about to be overturned)...
prevent millions of people from voting based on skin color and party affiliation...
lie about everything and never be held accountable...
etc...
It is like we live in two different worlds.
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)Congress has never passed a law to address this issue and the House just passed their first cut of one - H.R.3755 - Women's Health Protection Act of 2021
Now if that pesky filibuster wasn't there in the Senate, then it could become the law of the land (assuming no Democrats in the Senate object, and when it comes to the issue of abortions, you do run into "bipartisan" objections at times - it happened with the ACA).
Eliot Rosewater
(31,106 posts)Having Kavanaugh and ACB on the court is disgusting.
BumRushDaShow
(128,441 posts)ck4829
(35,038 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)for bird kills so the public would look there, meanwhile he was relaxing rules for oil and gas and mining so they could kill birds with impunity because it was cheaper for their businesses. Never take a word Trump says at face value. It's all manipulation, conniving, lying, abuse, and control. Always! imho
Bristlecone
(10,114 posts)StarryNite
(9,435 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,044 posts)that were hurting birds. It was the same old projection. What a lying snake.
RobertDevereaux
(1,847 posts)flamingdem
(39,308 posts)Makes me happy
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)madville
(7,404 posts)I would hope so, wouldnt want it to deter companies from expanding that renewable energy source.
An electric company cut down 500 acres of trees/forest a few years ago about 10 miles from me to put in a solar panel farm. I guess they probably dont have to worry about the birds so much though since they cut down all the trees. It got them some kind of credits or offsets, hated to see all those trees go though, solar panels arent as nice to look at.