Facebook Renames Itself Meta
Source: New York Times
SAN FRANCISCO Facebook rose to prominence over the past two decades with some of the worlds most recognizable branding: A big blue letter F. No longer. On Thursday, the social networking giant took an unmistakable step toward an overhaul, de-emphasizing Facebooks name and rebranding itself as Meta. The change comes with a new logo designed like an infinity-shaped symbol, slightly askew, almost like a pretzel. Facebook, Instagram and other apps will remain, but under the Meta umbrella.
The move punctuates how Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive, plans to refocus his Silicon Valley company on what he sees as the next digital frontier, which is the unification of disparate digital worlds into something called the metaverse. At the same time, renaming Facebook may help distance the company from the many social networking controversies it is facing, including how it spreads hate speech and misinformation. Ive been thinking a lot about our identity with this new chapter, Mr. Zuckerberg said, speaking at a virtual event to showcase Facebooks technological bets of the future. Over time, I hope were seen as a metaverse company.
Mr. Zuckerberg has been committed to building the metaverse, a composite universe melding online, virtual and augmented worlds that people can seamlessly traverse. He has said the metaverse can be the next major social platform and that several tech companies will build it over the next 10-plus years. On Monday, Facebook telegraphed its intent to be a big player when it separated its virtual reality and augmented reality business into a division known as Facebook Reality Labs.
But the timing of the shift has a double advantage. Facebook has grappled with some of the most intense scrutiny in its 17-year history in recent weeks. Lawmakers and the public have criticized its Instagram photo-sharing app for hurting some teenagers self-esteem and the company has faced questions for its role in amplifying misinformation and stirring unrest with inflammatory content.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/technology/facebook-rebrand-meta.html
LOL sounds like that will be a big tax evasion scheme.
rurallib
(62,426 posts)Champp
(2,114 posts)Let's keep this our little secret.
rurallib
(62,426 posts)Chipper Chat
(9,681 posts)CentralMass
(15,265 posts)underpants
(182,834 posts)Harker
(14,024 posts)And companies pay advertising executives for catchy ideas like that.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)my moms bestie, and like a second mom to me, was Meta. While she lived a very long, full life, glad she didnt live long enough to have to witness the defiling of her name.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,192 posts)How does this differ from the witness protection program?
Eugene
(61,903 posts)As long as *uckerberg remains a principal, this trip into Blackwater territory changes nothing.
dweller
(23,642 posts)MAGA was taken
✌🏻
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Ray Bruns
(4,098 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(9,983 posts)This makes a difference exactly how?
rickyhall
(4,889 posts)Ka-Dinh Oy
(11,686 posts)A rose by any other name is still a rose.
Yeah, I know Facebook/Meta is not a rose but you know what I mean.
Lithos
(26,403 posts)n/t
Stainless
(718 posts)Is another good name. Meta sucks.
QED
(2,747 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)if any corporate rapid dash to rebrand as fast as this one, doesn't SCREAM, Tax Scam, Covering My Sorry Global Corruption Owned Ass, it's this one.
ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)I didn't know it was supposed to be an M. It still doesn't look like one to me.
Budi
(15,325 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)dchill
(38,505 posts)House of Roberts
(5,177 posts)of my time.
Don't use Fakebook, Instacrap, Twittier or any of it now. Won't make me start using any of them going forward.
bucolic_frolic
(43,192 posts)marble falls
(57,112 posts)iscooterliberally
(2,860 posts)PatSeg
(47,510 posts)It changes absolutely nothing and the name is rather unimaginative and lame.
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)DU's old "Meta" forum - where people went to complain about DU and create circus sideshows.
PatSeg
(47,510 posts)I wonder who came up with this brilliant new name and why they chose that name.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)For a company under fire for relentlessly collecting and exploiting users' data, didn't it strike any of the pricey consultants no doubt involved in laying this turd that "Meta" might not be the best moniker?
Are we supposed to bow to our Meta data overlords?
PatSeg
(47,510 posts)How did these fools become so successful? Dumb luck?
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)as we know, Google renamed themselves "Alphabet".
That's why this Facebook thing seemed a bit silly and lagging, but then I know both companies have bought out large, previously-independent companies (like Facebook owning Instagram and Google owning YouTube). So...
PatSeg
(47,510 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)Doc Sportello
(7,522 posts)Meta Harry
Earth-shine
(4,044 posts)GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)Zuck is stealing.
Again.
orangecrush
(19,573 posts)Would have been more appropriate.
nuxvomica
(12,431 posts)orangecrush
(19,573 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)Wicked Blue
(5,834 posts)Keeps the crap flowing
Javaman
(62,531 posts)rebranding bullshit doesn't make it any less bullshit.
they are using the "wavy hand look over here" to distract from their mountain sized problems.
kimbutgar
(21,163 posts)TrogL
(32,822 posts)It's an open source virtual universe based on opensim server software and a viewer like Firestorm.
Same idea as Second Life but non-proprietary.
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)In fact, I had stumbled on a tweet that had an image of it.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)It would be in experience similar to Fortnight and Minecraft
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)which was probably one of the earliest "online" versions of the type immersive interaction with multi-person involvement, but apparently not on that chart that I can tell.
TrogL
(32,822 posts)Lets you build your own grids and regions
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)I haven't done any "sim" type gaming in almost 20 years. After awhile, online game had so much lag that it was a nuisance, whether it was you or one of your team mates.
(I know it's improved significantly now but still... )
sinkingfeeling
(51,460 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)PSPS
(13,603 posts)As far as I can tell with the way his people explain this is that, instead of bringing up Amazon and buying a box of detergent, you get into some Sims/WOW video game experience where "your avitar walks down the virtual street and sees a virtual display of laundry detergent. You can interact with other peoples' avitars about the detergents you see advertised or anything else like the weather, size of genitals, etc., and then your avitar pushes the 'buy' button." It seems to me that the audience for something like this would be very small, mostly online video game addicts.
BigmanPigman
(51,611 posts)LudwigPastorius
(9,155 posts)Zuckerberg should have just named the company "ChampionOfDemocracyAndAdvocateOfScience Inc."
Me.
(35,454 posts)and forget the one we now live in. Sounds trumpian to me,
Skittles
(153,169 posts)Budi
(15,325 posts)"...this interview with @karaswisher about Zuckerberg offers a good diagnostic of FB: A company that is radically hierarchical, that wants to think of themselves as radically horizontal."
Link to tweet
Budi
(15,325 posts)A: Because "Bot or Not?" didn't do as well in focus group testing.
******
Other names that didn't focus group well:
Harmville
Liespace
Macedonians R Us
Putinanny
Dataminecraft
******
.."still think they should have gone with Death Note"
"Death Tabs For Putie"
***
This is not going to be pretty.
texasfiddler
(1,990 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)Gosh...I feel all warm and fuzzy about this
blugbox
(951 posts)But I am very excited about the prospects of the metaverse. I can't wait to see it evolve.
Initech
(100,081 posts)Marthe48
(16,975 posts)Just saw it on facebook :/
dalton99a
(81,526 posts)consider_this
(2,203 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,611 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)but I expect that this takes that to the next step of allowing multiple people to interact in the same one scenario that is selected. The gaming industry has essentially done this for years with multiplayer gaming online, although generally gamers were watching their character on some monitor as they controlled it. I expect with this, you don your headset and have at it "as the character" (although to get the motion from arms/hands, I expect other things would need to be attached or you have some controller on your person (looked like he had some "watch" type thing on his wrist - the older VR devices have controllers like a wireless remote thingy), unless a headset has sensors to detect that motion.
I have a Samsung Gear VR that I bought 3 years ago and it was pretty cool (it worked with my Samsung Note9 and was made to work with that generation of phones) but haven't had chance (or time) to get back to it. It was nice to be able to watch Prez. Obama's tour of the White House video in VR because as he moved from room to room, the video had been shot with a 360 camera, so I could actually turn my head or look up and down and "see" all around each of the rooms.
I.e., this video -
(the above has up/down/left/right arrows that will allow you to actually "move" the image around in the same fashion and there is a VR version of it for VR devices)
panader0
(25,816 posts)can seamlessly traverse." That sounds ominous.
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)Zuckerberg was 15 years old when that movie came out.
Trueblue1968
(17,228 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)I still call Google... "Google" and not "Alphabet".
(it's a "parent company" naming gimmick)
twodogsbarking
(9,761 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,552 posts)Because it became too disruptive due to infighting.
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)That's basically what seems to happen on those platforms.
Rhiannon12866
(205,552 posts)Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)No middle finger smilie availability continues to be upsetting at moments.
BumRushDaShow
(129,127 posts)RobinA
(9,894 posts)thats creepy.
Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
jfz9580m This message was self-deleted by its author.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Zuckerberg is not my knight in shining amour.
Vinca
(50,279 posts)a conspiracy theory monger. Big bucks in bullshit.
twodogsbarking
(9,761 posts)What could be better.
bucolic_frolic
(43,192 posts)Polybius
(15,437 posts)Has any super-major company ever changed their name at the height of success?
3825-87867
(851 posts)My
Enormous
Trillion dollar
Ass
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)"Academi" or "Xe" would have been nice, but Blackwater took those.
"Meta" it is.
twodogsbarking
(9,761 posts)Response to BumRushDaShow (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
Jim G.
(14,811 posts)It's a place for the gullible.