Virginia's governor's race remains a dead heat in polls, but Democrats lead in early voting
Source: CNBC
By Annika Kim Constantino
Virginia gubernatorial candidates Terry McAuliffe and Glenn Youngkin remain neck-and-neck in polls ahead of next weeks highly competitive race for governor, but Democrats lead in early voting.
McAuliffe, the former Democratic governor who is seeking a comeback, leads his Republican opponent Youngkin by one percentage point in a Washington Post-Schar School poll released Friday.
McAuliffe hit 49% among likely voters polled while Youngkin was close behind at 48%, well within the polls margin of error of four percentage points. The poll was conducted from Oct. 20 to 26.
This shows a tighter race than the previous Washington Post-Schar School poll from mid-September, which found McAuliffe leading by three percentage points.
Glenn Youngkin, left, and Terry McAuliffe campaigning in Virginia.
Anna Moneymaker | Getty Images; Win McNamee | Getty Images
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/10/29/virginias-governors-race-remains-a-dead-heat-in-polls-but-democrats-lead-in-early-voting.html
elleng
(130,974 posts)Even if the obvious inference is they opened the ballots and publicized the interim results.
Even if it corrupts the elections.
I suppose what the repurtor wanted to say was along the lines of "most of the early mail-in ballots returned were from (D) majority area codes." That would have been inappropriately factual, and not confuse inference with fact. Hardly New journalism. (Which is homophonous with "nude journalism."
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)Many of the polls include a question re: whether you've voted already. Those are showing a consistent blue advantage. Even the Fox poll showed (IIRC) a 28% McAuliffe advantage among those who had already voted.
To be fair, however, that's entirely expected. We saw last year a clear difference between the parties re: early/absentee voting vs. in-person election day voting. The early voting numbers reported so far have improved moderately over the last week or so, but are not at a level where we should feel at all comfortable.
peggysue2
(10,832 posts)This is their model based on the areas from which the votes came (blue strongholds vs red strongholds), analyses from past years/cycles, party registration, interviewing people on the ground, lots of data, etc. The caveat is that it provides no absolutes nor does it predict final outcomes.
Just a peek at what this particular outfit infers from early-voting trends. In this case, the suggestion is that Dems have banked significant numbers of the early vote, 54%-30. Which also means it will all come down to the GOTV efforts for Tuesday. Will there be a MAGA surge? We don't know. Will the Dems have rousted enough low-propensity voters and made sure they get to the polls? We don't know. Has there been a lot of crossover voting? We don't know that either.
But if TargetSmart is correct in their analyses, then the Dems enter Tuesday with a clear advantage bc those early votes are like money in the bank.
We shall see. Pretty soon as it turns out.
The being said, I suspect all the recent howling of fraud from Republicans is partially due to these early-vote analyses, probably from their own in-house calculations. Youngkin was encouraging his voters to vote early. If these numbers are accurate, they didn't really listen.
Btw, I voted by mail for the first time in my county elections. My husband and I were accustomed to in-person, early voting in TN, something not available in PA. So, we went for the mail (drop box) route. Requested my ballot, received it in 5 days. We filled it out and delivered it to the nearest drop box. Little more than 24 hours, we were notified the ballots had been received and recorded.
Easy-peasy!
This may be old hat for a lot of people but I could not believe how quick and efficient it all was.
Good luck, Virginia! We're all rooting for you.
msongs
(67,420 posts)DFW
(54,405 posts)And he can sell pillows!
empedocles
(15,751 posts)seemed to be wracked by turmoil, danger, and generally unsafe.
McAuliffe went with his heavy 'trump card'.
DFW
(54,405 posts)My memory isn't exactly detailed or vivid. But my nephews went to school there and seem to have lived to tell the tale. They went on to Georgetown and Columbia, and never seemed overly plagued by turmoil, danger, or a lack of safety. Maybe farther down in the red areas?
That would make sense, since every time things deteriorate somewhere, Republicans seem to think that more of the same somehow constitutes an improvement.
Jon King
(1,910 posts)His one issue is that kids may read a book about racism, thats it. He has no interest in education, class sizes, teacher training, safety, etc.
So he is running on education, without any plans to improve education. And of course it is working.
empedocles
(15,751 posts)A bluish, now commuting county, whose school board was invaded by planned trumpers - to no great actual efect.
🤙🏼✨
I think he looks like a thinner version of Boofer Boy Kavanaugh.
MFM008
(19,816 posts)is up.
If this trend holds this clown and his name tag can go back home.
I know here in Washington State the votes in King and Pierce county-- especially King (Seattle)
make the race.
PortTack
(32,778 posts).McAuliffe making a come back...hes the favored Incumbent. The m$m has to have their horse race...so here ya go!
onenote
(42,714 posts)He was elected in 2013 for one term (as allowed by Virginia law). His win was by the narrowest of margins (he received less than 49 percent of the vote and was aided by the fact a Libertarian who got 6 percent of the vote).
It's close and while voting is up in Northern Virginia, this time around the repubs have been encouraged to vote early too.
Elessar Zappa
(14,004 posts)So thats some good news.
onenote
(42,714 posts)Based on past voting outcomes in those areas. I'm seeing more support for Youngkin in northern virginia than I have for previous republicans candidates.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)all those dead covid folk they killed.
UCmeNdc
(9,600 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,950 posts)Mz Pip
(27,451 posts)All the talk about it being close and even during election day the media was saying how it might take days,even weeks, before they knew the outcome.
They called it an hour after the polls closed.