Juror in Kyle Rittenhouse trial dismissed for telling joke about police shooting of Jacob Blake
Source: CNN
A juror was dismissed in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial Thursday morning after he told a joke to a deputy earlier this week about the police shooting of Jacob Blake.
The incident occurred when a male juror being escorted to his car made a joke about the shooting, Judge Bruce Schroeder said.
"I'm going to summarize what I remember, what I was told," Schroeder said. "He was telling a joke ... he told the officer ... he made a reference about telling a joke about 'Why did it take seven shots to shoot Jacob Blake,' something to that effect."
Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger took particular issue with the incident.
"The joke is in bad taste, there are a plethora of bad jokes out there with everything to do with all this, this is one of them. But I think the rest of this joke, as it were, suggests some sort of racial bias which I think comes into play," he said.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/04/us/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-thursday/index.html
Broken clock and all that.
orleans
(34,057 posts)Ray Bruns
(4,098 posts)11 white jurors and one African American. In a county that is 27% African American. They might as well shut this farce down and all go home and stop wasting everyone's time.
Harker
(14,024 posts)The judge is a boob.
Paladin
(28,264 posts)Not "Mr. Rittenhouse," not "the defendant"....but "Kyle."
Think that over for a while.
Being on a first name basis with the defendant, or seeing him as a poor waif, isn't impartial.
Paladin
(28,264 posts)The whole trial appears to be a rotten joke, from the judge on down...
Harker
(14,024 posts)SomewhereInTheMiddle
(285 posts)That caught my attention too.
I may be an old guy but I would not likely have referred to him so familiarly unless there was a prior relationship or that was how he had been referred to by others through out the process.
Neither are a good sign.
A couple years ago, in an egregious local stand your ground case, one of the arrest reports referred to the shooter as Michael (not Mr. Dacey). Story here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=journals&uid=213988&year=2018&month=12
Bengus81
(6,931 posts)What Judge refers to a defendant by their first name? This is fucking BULLSHIT...........
LiberalFighter
(50,946 posts)Bengus81
(6,931 posts)hay rick
(7,624 posts)I think it will become increasingly hard to exclude jurors who are willing to ignore any and all evidence that implicates a white defendant when the victims are non-white.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)This kind of thing takes time to build. If that happened on a massive scale, that would upend the rule of law and just throw another log onto the fire.
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Not expecting shit from this jury.