Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ruet

(10,039 posts)
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 12:57 PM Nov 2021

Juror in Kyle Rittenhouse trial dismissed for telling joke about police shooting of Jacob Blake

Source: CNN

A juror was dismissed in Kyle Rittenhouse's homicide trial Thursday morning after he told a joke to a deputy earlier this week about the police shooting of Jacob Blake.

The incident occurred when a male juror being escorted to his car made a joke about the shooting, Judge Bruce Schroeder said.
"I'm going to summarize what I remember, what I was told," Schroeder said. "He was telling a joke ... he told the officer ... he made a reference about telling a joke about 'Why did it take seven shots to shoot Jacob Blake,' something to that effect."
Kenosha County Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger took particular issue with the incident.
"The joke is in bad taste, there are a plethora of bad jokes out there with everything to do with all this, this is one of them. But I think the rest of this joke, as it were, suggests some sort of racial bias which I think comes into play," he said.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/11/04/us/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-thursday/index.html





Broken clock and all that.
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Juror in Kyle Rittenhouse trial dismissed for telling joke about police shooting of Jacob Blake (Original Post) ruet Nov 2021 OP
glad he was dismissed. broken clock reference is perfect nt orleans Nov 2021 #1
My bad. I am mixing up my trials. It was the Ahmaud Arbery murder trial. Ray Bruns Nov 2021 #2
That's my thinking, too. Harker Nov 2021 #3
"It was nothing to do with KYLE" says the dismissed juror. Paladin Nov 2021 #4
Good catch. Harker Nov 2021 #5
Who else on that jury is referring to that murderous little prick as "Kyle"? Paladin Nov 2021 #6
I'm guessing there won't be any more loose talk around that bailiff. n/t Harker Nov 2021 #10
Yeah ... SomewhereInTheMiddle Nov 2021 #7
Agree. hay rick Nov 2021 #9
Yup...what stood out the most to me when I read it Bengus81 Nov 2021 #12
It was the dismissed juror that referred to the kid by first name. LiberalFighter Nov 2021 #13
Your right...it was the Juror. My bad Bengus81 Nov 2021 #14
One consequence of the emergence of the Big Lie Party. hay rick Nov 2021 #8
In the long run, that may not be far off. LiberatedUSA Nov 2021 #11
What an inarticulate judge. LuckyLib Nov 2021 #15
Was this the Nullifier? Or are there more than 1? maxsolomon Nov 2021 #16

Ray Bruns

(4,098 posts)
2. My bad. I am mixing up my trials. It was the Ahmaud Arbery murder trial.
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 01:00 PM
Nov 2021

11 white jurors and one African American. In a county that is 27% African American. They might as well shut this farce down and all go home and stop wasting everyone's time.

Paladin

(28,264 posts)
4. "It was nothing to do with KYLE" says the dismissed juror.
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 02:06 PM
Nov 2021

Not "Mr. Rittenhouse," not "the defendant"....but "Kyle."

Think that over for a while.

Harker

(14,024 posts)
5. Good catch.
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 02:13 PM
Nov 2021

Being on a first name basis with the defendant, or seeing him as a poor waif, isn't impartial.

Paladin

(28,264 posts)
6. Who else on that jury is referring to that murderous little prick as "Kyle"?
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 02:18 PM
Nov 2021

The whole trial appears to be a rotten joke, from the judge on down...

7. Yeah ...
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 02:36 PM
Nov 2021

That caught my attention too.

I may be an old guy but I would not likely have referred to him so familiarly unless there was a prior relationship or that was how he had been referred to by others through out the process.

Neither are a good sign.

hay rick

(7,624 posts)
9. Agree.
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 02:47 PM
Nov 2021

A couple years ago, in an egregious local stand your ground case, one of the arrest reports referred to the shooter as Michael (not Mr. Dacey). Story here: https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=journals&uid=213988&year=2018&month=12

Bengus81

(6,931 posts)
12. Yup...what stood out the most to me when I read it
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 03:20 PM
Nov 2021

What Judge refers to a defendant by their first name? This is fucking BULLSHIT...........

hay rick

(7,624 posts)
8. One consequence of the emergence of the Big Lie Party.
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 02:40 PM
Nov 2021

I think it will become increasingly hard to exclude jurors who are willing to ignore any and all evidence that implicates a white defendant when the victims are non-white.

 

LiberatedUSA

(1,666 posts)
11. In the long run, that may not be far off.
Thu Nov 4, 2021, 03:15 PM
Nov 2021

This kind of thing takes time to build. If that happened on a massive scale, that would upend the rule of law and just throw another log onto the fire.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Juror in Kyle Rittenhouse...