Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,570 posts)
Thu Nov 25, 2021, 07:15 PM Nov 2021

New Reconstruction Points to Animal Origins for Covid-19

Source: The Wall Street Journal.

WORLD ASIA CHINA

New Reconstruction Points to Animal Origins for Covid-19

An evolutionary biologist reviewed data and reports on first known cases to show most were clustered around Wuhan’s seafood market

By Betsy McKay
https://twitter.com/betswrites
betsy.mckay@wsj.com
Updated Nov. 18, 2021 2:31 pm ET

A scientist known for investigating viral origins has reconstructed the first known weeks of the Covid-19 pandemic, adding to a growing body of evidence that the virus behind it jumped from infected animals to humans rather than emerging from laboratory research.

In a paper published Thursday in the academic journal Science, Michael Worobey concludes a wholesale seafood market in Wuhan, China, where live mammals were sold is very likely to be the site of the origin of the pandemic.

TO READ THE FULL STORY
SUBSCRIBE
SIGN IN

Read more: https://www.wsj.com/articles/new-reconstruction-points-to-animal-origins-for-covid-19-11637262041



A scientist known for investigating viral origins concluded that Covid-19 likely jumped to humans from animals, with early transmission at a Wuhan market where live raccoon dogs were sold


21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New Reconstruction Points to Animal Origins for Covid-19 (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2021 OP
Paywall Bayard Nov 2021 #1
They had stopped eating them... jmowreader Nov 2021 #7
Journalist goes undercover at "wet markets", where the Coronavirus started Larissa Nov 2021 #2
The problem is it's circumstantial. Igel Nov 2021 #3
Kick Omaha Steve Nov 2021 #4
they mapped the 1st deaths. closer to the animal market. therefore the animal market. duh pansypoo53219 Nov 2021 #5
The WSJ Drags Out The Dead Horse WHITT Nov 2021 #6
Earliest documented case in Europe was in January of 2020. LisaL Nov 2021 #8
Where Ya Been? WHITT Nov 2021 #10
What cases? LisaL Nov 2021 #13
Can you cite a source for that? All I've come up with so far is mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2021 #14
I Love WHITT Nov 2021 #15
Can you find round two? It would help. Thanks. mahatmakanejeeves Nov 2021 #17
It's Old News WHITT Nov 2021 #21
Long, short, and middle of this issue Rural_Progressive Nov 2021 #9
Moot WHITT Nov 2021 #11
Apparently you know more than a scientist publishing in Science. LisaL Nov 2021 #12
I'm Afraid Not WHITT Nov 2021 #16
Sure don't but thanks to my background and my wife's work Rural_Progressive Nov 2021 #19
Cases in Europe before 2012? Rural_Progressive Nov 2021 #18
Nope WHITT Nov 2021 #20

jmowreader

(50,562 posts)
7. They had stopped eating them...
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 03:47 PM
Nov 2021

…until the placeholder between the Obama and Biden Administrations decided to start a trade war with China. With no US pork available, they went back to eating small animals.

Without the need to eat small animals, the coronavirus would not have made the jump to humans. And without Trump allowing 40,000 people to fly to the US from China in the early days before we had testing, the virus could have been contained.

Therefore, the pandemic is 100 percent Trump’s fault.

Igel

(35,337 posts)
3. The problem is it's circumstantial.
Thu Nov 25, 2021, 10:40 PM
Nov 2021

It relies on the cases attested elsewhere as having been transmitted from the market by means of asymptomatic carriers. Certainly possible.

On the other hand, it's possible that a superspreader worked in that part of the market, or happened to be there and spent a lot of time there at the right time. Meaning that the virus walked into the market--perhaps in somebody symptomatic, perhaps in an asymptomatic carrier.

What they need is some evidence showing that the virus was somehow adapted specifically to this particular critter. I haven't see n that claim yet.

I'm trying to say that I recall one family that was infected (early evidence for human-to-human transmission) had more than one person connected to the market. But I don't know that I recall that being confirmed or if it was a bit of missed-information, something claimed given some rumor but dismissed as false a few days later. Fog of war and all that.

It also goes against a few things. It resets the timeline for the "first known case" later than two other proposed "first known cases," if I recall correctly. One first case was in mid-November, the other on/about Dec. 1. Hadn't heard that the early first identified cases were debunked.

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
6. The WSJ Drags Out The Dead Horse
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 02:28 PM
Nov 2021

to beat on it some more.

Wuhan MAY well have been the initial location of the outbreak WITHIN CHINA, but China WAS NOT the "origin of the pandemic", as cases were documented much earlier in Europe, not to mention the strain that infected New York originated in Europe, not China.

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
10. Where Ya Been?
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 06:36 PM
Nov 2021

Cases documented in Italy in September 2019, and evidence of cases in Spain even before that. Earliest cases in China were later.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,570 posts)
14. Can you cite a source for that? All I've come up with so far is
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 06:45 PM
Nov 2021

maybe, maybe not.

For instance:

How early was the coronavirus really circulating in Italy?

By Yasemin Saplakoglu November 18, 2020

A new study suggests as early as September of last year, but some experts are skeptical.

The new coronavirus may have been circulating in Italy since September 2019, months before the first official case was detected in the country, according to a new study from Italy. But public health experts say that more analysis is needed for that timeline to be confirmed.

The World Health Organization's China office first picked up the scent of a mysterious cluster of pneumonia cases in the city of Wuhan from local media statements on Dec. 31 and rang the alarm bells at the start of the new year, according to the WHO's timeline. Scientists later traced the first known case of COVID-19 in Wuhan back to Nov. 17, 2019, Live Science previously reported.

But the actual pandemic timeline — from the moment the virus hopped from animals to humans to when it first crossed international borders — remains murky. Italy, one of the worst-hit countries in Europe during the first wave of the virus, recorded its first local case on Feb. 20 in Lombardy, a region in northern Italy. That case suggested that the virus had been circulating in Italy since January of this year, according to the new study published on Nov. 11 in the Tumori Journal.

{snip}

"I would be very cautious," about these findings, said Dr. George Rutherford, professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at the University of California, San Francisco, who was also not a part of the study. The results "have to be confirmed with different antibody tests," that look for the prevalence of antibodies that target other parts of the coronavirus.

{snip}

Something more recent would help.

Thanks.

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
15. I Love
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 09:26 PM
Nov 2021

the "some experts are skeptical" shit.

These are the same clowns that are trying to sell the stand-on-your-head-and-rub-your-tummy conspiracy that the virus was created in/escaped from a lab, without a scintilla of evidence, yet they are "skeptical" of actual scientific evidence.

Here's the original cite:

https://www.reuters.com/article/health-coronavirus-italy-timing/researchers-find-coronavirus-was-circulating-in-italy-earlier-than-thought-idUSKBN27W1J2

and the Italian scientists published a round two, addressing and debunking the fake criticisms and skepticism, which is also posted here somewhere.



mahatmakanejeeves

(57,570 posts)
17. Can you find round two? It would help. Thanks.
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 09:52 PM
Nov 2021
and the Italian scientists published a round two, addressing and debunking the fake criticisms and skepticism, which is also posted here somewhere.

Rural_Progressive

(1,106 posts)
9. Long, short, and middle of this issue
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 06:30 PM
Nov 2021

We will never know. The CCP has destroyed all the information and material needed to figure anything out about the origin and etiology of this strain of virus.

End.Of.Story

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
16. I'm Afraid Not
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 09:28 PM
Nov 2021

Apparently you haven't been paying attention, as this was all laid out in a number of previous threads.

Rural_Progressive

(1,106 posts)
19. Sure don't but thanks to my background and my wife's work
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 10:08 PM
Nov 2021

we know folks who do know a whole lot about this whole mess.

Rural_Progressive

(1,106 posts)
18. Cases in Europe before 2012?
Fri Nov 26, 2021, 10:07 PM
Nov 2021

Because there is line of evidence suggesting this whole thing started in a copper mine in Yunnan province back then.

Like I said, with the coverup the CCP instigated there will never be a clear line of evidence that will pinpoint how this whole sh*tshow actually started.

WHITT

(2,868 posts)
20. Nope
Sat Nov 27, 2021, 12:21 AM
Nov 2021
Because there is line of evidence suggesting this whole thing started in a copper mine in Yunnan province back then.

No there isn't.


Like I said, with the coverup the CCP instigated there will never be a clear line of evidence that will pinpoint how this whole sh*tshow actually started.

The U.S. wouldn't be cooperating with a bogus investigation that started at another time and in another country, I don't get why some folks expect China to do so. You can't coverup something that never happened.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New Reconstruction Points...