Matthew McConaughey says he will not run for Texas governor
Source: The Guardian
Mon 29 Nov 2021 07.23 EST
The actor Matthew McConaughey will not run for Texas governor, removing one potential obstacle from the path of Beto ORourke, the former Democratic congressman and candidate for Senate and president now seeking to defeat the Republican Greg Abbott.
He made the announcement that he would not in a short video posted to social media on Sunday night, two weeks before the deadline to declare.
Instead, McConaughey said, he would look to support businesses and foundations that I believe are leaders, establishments that I believe are creating pathways for people to succeed in life, organizations that have a mission to serve and build trust and dream.
Read more: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/29/matthew-mcconaughey-texas-governor-will-not-run
global1
(25,294 posts)Response to global1 (Reply #1)
PubliusEnigma This message was self-deleted by its author.
Calista241
(5,586 posts)dchill
(38,599 posts)PubliusEnigma
(1,583 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Goodbye Abbott !
Elessar Zappa
(14,125 posts)His gun grabbing comments will likely doom him, imo.
RussBLib
(9,056 posts)... not a "taking" of assault weapons. Handguns, long rifles not involved. That's a point that many people miss.
RevBrotherThomas
(838 posts)...Abbott will play the "taking away your 2nd Amendment" line to the hilt.
musclecar6
(1,693 posts)I agree that the right wing nuts equate anything mentioned about their weapons being restricted in any way, they go hysterical. All rational thought ceases. What a bunch of dumb fucks.
Polybius
(15,519 posts)A lot of Texas Democrats hate his "Hell yeah we're gonna take your AR15, AK47" comments.
SmittyWerben
(823 posts)"Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47." He said "take," whatever he intended after that is lost in the noise of "confiscation." He cannot win state wide in Texas.
maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)"Hell, yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47. We'll take anything."
How I wish that exchange had gone...
Polybius
(15,519 posts)Then he's proposing taking them away.
RussBLib
(9,056 posts)Beto did propose a MANDATORY buyback of assault weapons, which is unworkable. A voluntary buyback would reduce the number of weapons, but only slightly. Without public buy-in, a mandatory buyback could get ugly. And I have no doubt that many of the assault weapons on the street were not purchased legally and tracking them down would be next to impossible.
Beto has time to amend his position, and he should
Polybius
(15,519 posts)If you are going to do a voluntary buyback, offer three times the price for the gun. So if it retailed for $600, buy it back for $1,800. I think that would get many to sell. But I don't support any of this while running a campaign in Texas.
EX500rider
(10,885 posts)There are 17 people killed by handguns for everyone shot by a rifle, all rifles not just AR/AK's
And I don't think it would help much with mass shootings either, pistols will work just as well:
The Virginia Tech shooting was a spree shooting that occurred on April 16, 2007, comprising two attacks on the campus of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Blacksburg, Virginia, United States. Seung-Hui Cho, an undergraduate student at the university and a U.S. resident of South Korean descent, killed 32 people and wounded 17 others with two semi-automatic pistols.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virginia_Tech_shooting
EX500rider
(10,885 posts)...accounting for 8,029 homicides in 2020.
Knives: 1739
Hands/fists/feet:662
All rifles of which AR's & AK's are a subset: 455
https://www.statista.com/statistics/195325/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-weapon-used/
Lonestarblue
(10,148 posts)Other than an acknowledgment of the email, Ive heard nothing back about my comments. Anyone who agrees that his gun stance is a losing proposition might also send an email. Perhaps t would have an impact if many people share their response. The email I used is info@betofortexas.com.
Im sure others will disagree, but the war over guns has already been lost. Even a buy-back program would most likely reduce the number of guns by a very small amount, especially in Texas. To me, its a third-rail topic that is an unnecessary impediment to a successful campaign. There are so many more issues that are important to Texas voters, like healthcare (especially reproductive rights and one of the highest maternal death rates in the nation), refusal to expand Medicaid. the energy grid, unaffordable housing in cities like Austin, unequal K-12 education, child care costs, 20% of the states children living in poverty, the conditions in border towns being overrun with migrants, voting rights and fair elections.
JohnSJ
(92,493 posts)nuances Beto may make, including buy backs, etc. I don't think it will fly.
TheRickles
(2,099 posts)TxGuitar
(4,216 posts)He has not defined any stands on any issues.
Good that he is out.
LeftInTX
(25,732 posts)relayerbob
(6,561 posts)I will not be running for office in the 2022 elections.
Just so were all clear.
Paladin
(28,282 posts)Suits me fine.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)He talked of running an independent campaign.
Paladin
(28,282 posts)His choice of phrases is over-the-top Hollywood touchy-feely, but there's never been any real doubt that he'd end up as yet another Texas Republican hack---of which we already have way too many.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)yellowdogintexas
(22,288 posts)Beto for sure. His popularity would split the vote and throw the race into a runoff.
Runoffs are bad because no one remembers to vote in them. This is how we got Ted Cruz in the first place - a no show runoff in the Republican primary
Matthew needs to support Beto's platform regarding all the things he likes and stay away from everything else.
I am all for his philanthropy and good works.
JohnSJ
(92,493 posts)chance to someone who could defeat Abbott.
The gun issue I don't will fare well with Texans. Hope I am wrong
Paladin
(28,282 posts)JohnSJ
(92,493 posts)good for Beto against Abbott
Paladin
(28,282 posts)And that's from a guy who grew up there. Fifty years ago, Austin was cool. It's been going downhill, ever since. I still have lots of old friends there---they whine about the traffic jams, they moan about their tax rates, they kvetch about the snotty out-of-state neighbors, they gripe about UT football being in the toilet, they go into convulsions over housing prices...and they'll never leave the place.
Beto toasted himself with the gun remarks. Damn shame, because a shithead like Abbott could have been taken down with the big city vote.
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)Alright alright alright.....I guess.
Paladin
(28,282 posts)You'll always have plenty of uninformed company, here at DU.
BradAllison
(1,879 posts)JohnSJ
(92,493 posts)sounds like urban sprawl based on your assessment
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(289 posts)And returned to live there in the '80's and '90's. I loved the town back then.
Occasionally make it back for visits. Not sure I would want to go back there to live unless I won the lottery or had some other similar financial windfall. It is just too expensive, especially to live in the parts that still feel like I remember Austin feeling (Clarksville, Hyde Park, etc.).
It was, and I imagine still is, very different than much of the rest of the state in terms of politics.
Paladin
(28,282 posts)Most of the big cities---Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, El Paso and others---have shown strong Democratic voting surges in recent elections.
yellowdogintexas
(22,288 posts)Hilary did not carry the county (she did carry Fort Worth) but the others did.
Our local party has been working hard on this; it doesn't hurt that we now have attractive candidates in every slot on the ballot. We went for years with candidates in the legislative and executive positions, but not judicial. There were times when there were not enough Democrats on the ballot to have a primary in many of our 254 counties.
In 2020 we had primaries in every county for the first time in a very long time.
Getting folks to the polls in November is the answer. I have been told by several active Democrats that if our vote had lived up to its potential here in Tarrant County Beto would be our Senator. Think about that: turnout in ONE county could have flipped it.
Throw in the other big counties and there you have it.
Beto can still rally up a crowd and raise funds. He is kicking off his Tarrant County campaign Dec 3; the size of that crowd is going to be a key indicator. If he draws a huge number despite Omicron that is going to have an impact. He has been out in the middle sized cities all week.
He and his teams were on top of it during the Freeze; knocking on doors &making phone calls to check on folks in areas without power and getting them to a warm place. He had 250,000 volunteers helping out. Meanwhile, Abbott was hemming and hawing and Cruz expatriated himself
highplainsdem
(49,106 posts)heckles65
(549 posts)PSPS
(13,629 posts)maxsolomon
(33,449 posts)Most TX Librulz would.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Curious to see if he can recover from his gun statements.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,241 posts)He's signed up to do a mini-series with HBO for "A Time For Mercy", the sequel to "A Time to Kill" that made him a star. Short of getting HBO to put off filming for 4 years or more, which wouldn't happen, there is no way he ever would have run. Why he did this song and dance about possibly running, I don't know. Actors like publicity, especially when it's free.
https://www.indiewire.com/2021/03/matthew-mcconaughey-hbo-time-to-kill-sequel-time-for-mercy-1234624636/