Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
Thu Dec 16, 2021, 08:43 PM Dec 2021

Senate parliamentarian rejects Democrats' third attempt to include immigration in economic bill

Source: CNN

The Senate parliamentarian on Thursday rejected Democrats' third attempt to include immigration in President Joe Biden's economic bill, delivering a major blow to Democrats who have repeatedly sought to include immigration provisions in the Build Back Better bill.

It's the latest hit to the Biden administration's immigration agenda and likely marks the end of the road for providing protections to millions of undocumented immigrants through the budget process known as reconciliation, which would not require GOP votes.

Senate Parliamentarian Elizabeth MacDonough advises the chamber on how its rules, protocols and precedents should be applied as Democrats and the White House figure out what they can include in the massive spending bill.

Democratic aides had pushed for the third attempt, dubbed "Plan C," before MacDonough and her staff weeks ago after she struck down two other attempts to include more extensive immigration provisions in the bill.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/16/politics/immigration-senate-democrats-parliamentarian-build-back-better/index.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Senate parliamentarian rejects Democrats' third attempt to include immigration in economic bill (Original Post) Calista241 Dec 2021 OP
They should MOMFUDSKI Dec 2021 #1
She rejected lots of Republican demands over the years Polybius Dec 2021 #4
Neutrality is not always a laudable stance Orrex Dec 2021 #5
Wouldn't get them anywhere... FBaggins Dec 2021 #6
Besides, Manchin has said he'd never support such a move... regnaD kciN Dec 2021 #7
It's more than Manchin, a lot of them have said that. Calista241 Dec 2021 #9
Time for MacDonough Rebl2 Dec 2021 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author Rebl2 Dec 2021 #3
This is all about the "Byrd Rule" BumRushDaShow Dec 2021 #8

Orrex

(63,220 posts)
5. Neutrality is not always a laudable stance
Thu Dec 16, 2021, 09:08 PM
Dec 2021

In times of corruption and oppression, neutrality favors the corrupt oppressor.

FBaggins

(26,756 posts)
6. Wouldn't get them anywhere...
Thu Dec 16, 2021, 09:17 PM
Dec 2021

... and just make them look petty/political.

There's no chance of the media covering it positively.

regnaD kciN

(26,045 posts)
7. Besides, Manchin has said he'd never support such a move...
Thu Dec 16, 2021, 09:20 PM
Dec 2021

...and would vote against any bill that didn't have her approval.

Response to Calista241 (Original post)

BumRushDaShow

(129,339 posts)
8. This is all about the "Byrd Rule"
Thu Dec 16, 2021, 09:29 PM
Dec 2021
that has been there for a long time.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/2/644

That rider should have been tacked onto the Defense Authorization bill. There might be a possibility to also stick it on the Farm Bill (next one is up in 2023).
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Senate parliamentarian re...