Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,657 posts)
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 12:06 PM Jan 2022

Theodore Roosevelt statue removed from outside New York's Museum of Natural History

Source: Washington Post

A statue of Theodore Roosevelt, the 26th president of the United States, was removed overnight Wednesday from its spot outside the American Museum of Natural History in New York City.

The towering bronze statue depicts Roosevelt riding a horse, as two nameless African and Native American men flank him on foot.

It has provoked strong debate in the city, as many criticized the apparent subservience of the pair to the White man in the center — calling the scene a symbol of racism and colonialism.

“The statue was meant to celebrate Theodore Roosevelt … as a devoted naturalist and author of works on natural history,” the museum website has said about the removal. “At the same time, the statue itself communicates a racial hierarchy that the Museum and members of the public have long found disturbing.”


Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2022/01/20/theodore-roosevelt-statue-new-york/
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Theodore Roosevelt statue removed from outside New York's Museum of Natural History (Original Post) brooklynite Jan 2022 OP
They should put horse & Teddy back, separate the others, put them on higher pedestals looking down.n Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #1
"put them on higher pedestals looking down." and that would not create problems? Escurumbele Jan 2022 #11
I thought Lincoln was Republican. He wasn't any good? Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #24
Whatever you do creates problems. TR was progressive and the others looking down is partial redress. Bernardo de La Paz Jan 2022 #25
Progressive, yes, but with a strong warmonger streak. paleotn Jan 2022 #26
Anyone who still holds TR in high regard should read "The Imperial Cruise" by James Bradley ... eppur_se_muova Jan 2022 #2
The accuracy of that book is not universally accepted. cab67 Jan 2022 #7
I Don't Know If Its Fair modrepub Jan 2022 #9
isn't there an old saying "those who forget history are doomed to demigoddess Jan 2022 #32
It's Not Forgetting modrepub Jan 2022 #33
Telling people one thing and deliberately doing another is not a mistake. eppur_se_muova Jan 2022 #37
Anyone who doesn't should read his biography. Escurumbele Jan 2022 #12
Amazing book LT Barclay Jan 2022 #20
Oh, goody...I wonder how long it will be Glorfindel Jan 2022 #3
If I am not mistaken, that was built in 1935 when none of that was offensive, on the contrary Escurumbele Jan 2022 #14
I grew up in a hunting society in the southern Appalachians Glorfindel Jan 2022 #19
It would be tough to name more than 10 presidents that weren't racist (nt) DarwinsRetriever Jan 2022 #4
"10 presidents that weren't racist." Pantagruel Jan 2022 #5
He was not racist. He nominated the first black person to office and he got a lot of Escurumbele Jan 2022 #15
Including TR's cousin nt ripcord Jan 2022 #21
Our cultural definition of "racism" has changed and evolved with the times FakeNoose Jan 2022 #22
This is fodder for the GOP's culture wars. andym Jan 2022 #6
Yeah, that's what I was thinking jmowreader Jan 2022 #8
Well explained...Thank you...History in a paragraph. Escurumbele Jan 2022 #16
Or just standing there in a suit, life size, on the ground. maxsolomon Jan 2022 #39
I don't say this lightly(1860 llashram Jan 2022 #10
The Cuban war where Teddy participated and fought was against the Spaniards Escurumbele Jan 2022 #18
US interests were in the sugar plantations IronLionZion Jan 2022 #23
okay llashram Jan 2022 #36
The Maine sunk due to a boiler exploding. alfredo Jan 2022 #31
Captain Sigsbee, the Maine's skipper, suspected that the explosion was caused by a fire in... eppur_se_muova Jan 2022 #38
A lot...volumns llashram Jan 2022 #40
Could we replace it with a hologram of Robin Williams riding through the museum? Brother Buzz Jan 2022 #13
Apart from the colonialism controversy, it was a bad statue aesthetically. harumph Jan 2022 #17
Historical Context Ron Obvious Jan 2022 #27
Hurts the leftmalong the political spectrum, - for getting things done empedocles Jan 2022 #28
Roosevelt was a President! Another cancel culture that will cost us question everything Jan 2022 #29
Wait till they come after Jimmy Carter. cinematicdiversions Jan 2022 #30
Just a side note to the Teddy Roosevelt controversy generalbetrayus Jan 2022 #34
I was with a tour group in Saint Petersburg, Russia. tavernier Jan 2022 #35

Escurumbele

(3,401 posts)
11. "put them on higher pedestals looking down." and that would not create problems?
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 01:58 PM
Jan 2022

Just take the two others out and put Teddy and his horse back. He was a great president, a progressive, regardless of whether he was a republican or not, he was republican out of stubbornness more than anything, republican politicians did not like him because he wanted to do good for the country and its people, all of them. He fought for people's rights, and he was a very intelligent and interesting man who should be celebrated.

He is the only good republican president this country has ever had.

eppur_se_muova

(36,274 posts)
2. Anyone who still holds TR in high regard should read "The Imperial Cruise" by James Bradley ...
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 12:17 PM
Jan 2022


From the Phillipines to the Russo-Japanes War to selling out Korea, his actions were those of a dyed-in-the-wool racist.

modrepub

(3,499 posts)
9. I Don't Know If Its Fair
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 01:55 PM
Jan 2022

to hold up historical figures to the norms of today's society. Historians generally judge people's character compared to norms at the time they lived. Norms change over time as society evolves. I don't think folks 100 years from now will think much of today's folks' moral compasses (at least I would expect they wouldn't).

And that gets back to one major issue I have with our current society. The utter lack of allowance for people making mistakes. No one is perfect. We all do things we later regret or upon reflection wish we hadn't done. There's almost no allowance for making mistakes in the public arena any more and I think that's a shame.

modrepub

(3,499 posts)
33. It's Not Forgetting
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 10:33 PM
Jan 2022

it's context. TR was the ultimate male chauvinist, America First, white privilege poster boy. No getting around it. But in his day that was just accepted as normal. Woman's suffrage was decades away. TR and America were living in the shadow of the Civil War (and Jim Crow). You'd be hard pressed to find very many "progressives" in Victorian America. So for his time, the attitudes he expressed and actions he took were pretty much universally accepted at least by those with power.

History often repeats itself but with subtle differences. Hopefully we struggle, evolve and progress. But that "progress" isn't guaranteed by any means. New generations will have new ways of looking at things and the old ones and old ways will fade into history.

eppur_se_muova

(36,274 posts)
37. Telling people one thing and deliberately doing another is not a mistake.
Fri Jan 21, 2022, 04:30 PM
Jan 2022

I'm pretty sure that's been against the standards of societies throughout history. But TR felt it was OK to lie to 'little yellow people'.

What was most repugnant about the events of that time was the extent to which all the best and brightest were taught the same pseudo-scientific racist "theory" -- in America's leading universities -- that claimed Caucasian societies were superior to all others, based on pseudo-mythical "histories".

Escurumbele

(3,401 posts)
12. Anyone who doesn't should read his biography.
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 02:10 PM
Jan 2022

Read the trilogy by Edmund Morris, a great biography.

[link:https://www.amazon.com/Edmund-Morriss-Theodore-Roosevelt-Trilogy/dp/0812958632/ref=sr_1_3?crid=23VLNGOCNT8DQ&keywords=theodore+roosevelt+biography&qid=1642701581&sprefix=theodore+roosevelt+bio%2Caps%2C189&sr=8-3|

You have to realize that some of the decisions he made were, first pro-USA, and second these were decisions inherent to the times.

The decisions I disagreed with, one which I think eventually killed him from agony, was to send his sons to a war where the USA had no reason to be in (like many other wars, of course), one where the opposing forces were too strong and the likelihood of his sons coming back alive were slim. One of them got in the Air Force and didn't even have good vision, he got killed, but his stubbornness of trying to make his sons do the patriotic thing in a stupid war cost one his life and the other was never the same when he came back.

Read the trilogy, they do talk about the action by Roosevelt "The Imperial Cruise" talks about.

All in all, Teddy did more good than bad for the country, he was a real progressive, reason why republican politicians hated him. He is by far the best president the republican party has ever had.

LT Barclay

(2,606 posts)
20. Amazing book
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 02:49 PM
Jan 2022

I’ve had to learn that the best presidents did some wrong and even the worst do some things right, but overall his decisions were horrible.
I think it is a great companion book to L. Fletcher Prouty’s book centered around JFK’s assassination.

Glorfindel

(9,732 posts)
3. Oh, goody...I wonder how long it will be
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 12:37 PM
Jan 2022

before they whitewash (ha, ha) the murals in the Theodore Roosevelt Rotunda? They are, after all, wildly offensive.



Escurumbele

(3,401 posts)
14. If I am not mistaken, that was built in 1935 when none of that was offensive, on the contrary
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 02:16 PM
Jan 2022

it showed that "he was a man"...That is history, people should not be offended by it.

Do I like hunting, killing defenseless animals that cannot shoot back? Of course not, but those were the times. We can't hide history.

And before anyone disputes what I wrote...No, it does not compare to the confederation "heroes", those confederate people wanted to secede, Teddy was just doing what seemed to be the right thing, fashionable thing at the time, and he did it for science whether right or wrong his motives were mostly good. Some hunting he did was for the thrill, I get it, I don't approve it.

Even though he did hunt a lot, he was key to protecting land and animals.

Glorfindel

(9,732 posts)
19. I grew up in a hunting society in the southern Appalachians
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 02:47 PM
Jan 2022

though I personally never killed anything but squirrels and snakes. I don't even do that anymore. I actually admire ol' Teddy. He was a man of his times, and he did a lot of good things. Except for Dwight Eisenhower, I can't say that about any other rePuke presidents of the 20th or 21st Centuries. I was truly being sarcastic about the murals. I sincerely hope they won't be whitewashed. They're not great art, but I enjoy looking at them.

 

Pantagruel

(2,580 posts)
5. "10 presidents that weren't racist."
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 12:52 PM
Jan 2022

Bingo!
That's why the goobers are so frightened of anything illuminating like CRT.

Escurumbele

(3,401 posts)
15. He was not racist. He nominated the first black person to office and he got a lot of
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 02:20 PM
Jan 2022

negativity from doing that. The first black official to have dinner with a USA president in the White House.


In 1901, President Theodore Roosevelt invited African-American educator Booker T. Washington, who had become close to the president, to dine with his family at the White House. Several other presidents had invited African-Americans to meetings at the White House, but never to a meal. And in 1901, segregation was law.


FakeNoose

(32,680 posts)
22. Our cultural definition of "racism" has changed and evolved with the times
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 04:58 PM
Jan 2022

It would be absurd to judge people who lived in previous centuries by the standards of our current time. That includes our evolving definition of racism, but so much more besides.

andym

(5,445 posts)
6. This is fodder for the GOP's culture wars.
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 01:04 PM
Jan 2022

TR was a trust-busting progressive who acted against the monied interests of his day as well as supporting conservation. Perhaps they can create a statue with just TR on a horse as a compromise.

jmowreader

(50,561 posts)
8. Yeah, that's what I was thinking
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 01:48 PM
Jan 2022

There are a LOT of sculptors in this country who could cut the other two people off the sculpture, create new panels to fill in the gaps the other two people’s removal would cause, then weld in the new panels and put TR back outside the Museum. All bronze sculptures are welded together anyway.

maxsolomon

(33,345 posts)
39. Or just standing there in a suit, life size, on the ground.
Sat Jan 22, 2022, 01:19 PM
Jan 2022

It implied, very strongly, subservience and inferiority.

It's being sent to ND, and will be recontextualized.

The Roosevelt statue will be on long-term loan to the Theodore Roosevelt Presidential Library due to open in 2026, in North Dakota, where Roosevelt spent time in the Badlands. The presidential library was termed “a fitting new home” by New York City officials when the decision was made last year, noting it could be “appropriately contextualized” there.

The GQP will forget about this statue; they don't need the ammo for their culture wars.

llashram

(6,265 posts)
10. I don't say this lightly(1860
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 01:57 PM
Jan 2022

but with conviction, t. Roosevelt was racist. On the level of TFG. Talked to my grandfather some years back about the crusade to protect American business interests in Cuba. Otherwise known as the Spanish-American War. Under that guise and alleged by CT a false flag operation as instigated by Newspaper publisher Hearst someone or some "terrorists" blew up and sank the battleship U.S.S. Maine. My grandfather, a soldier in the Cuban Incursion, told me simply, "Roosevelt hated Negroes and to never forget". I had shown interest because I being an Army brat got interested in all things military---historically.

All these so-called leaders statues should be taken down and melted into a wall depicting a black man in chains(1860---to a black man in chains---2022)

Escurumbele

(3,401 posts)
18. The Cuban war where Teddy participated and fought was against the Spaniards
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 02:23 PM
Jan 2022

He fought to liberate Cuba, had nothing to do with black people. You do know that Spaniards are mostly white, right?

IronLionZion

(45,474 posts)
23. US interests were in the sugar plantations
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 05:19 PM
Jan 2022

Spain used African slaves. Prior to the US civil war, confederate states were interested in taking Cuba as another slave state or territory.

Slavery in the Americas had ended by the time of the Spanish-American war so it was marketed as Cuban independence

llashram

(6,265 posts)
36. okay
Fri Jan 21, 2022, 01:13 PM
Jan 2022

never said the S-AWar was about black people. And yes I know the average Spaniard is caucasian-European white.

The liberation of Cuba was a by-product of the S-AWar. My grandfather was with one of the units that pulled Roosevelt and his unit out of the fire(literally)where they were in danger of being overrun on San Juan Hill. And that after my grandfather's unit's had pushed the 'Spainards' back on the real meat grinder the battle for Kettle Hill. All African-American troops did this. San Juan Hill; was just a political photo op for the guy who would become POTUS. You know that right? And T. Roosevelt was a committed racist. Right?

alfredo

(60,075 posts)
31. The Maine sunk due to a boiler exploding.
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 08:04 PM
Jan 2022

Did Hearst know the truth?
Hearst’s newspaper was printed on yellow paper. Yellow Journalism

eppur_se_muova

(36,274 posts)
38. Captain Sigsbee, the Maine's skipper, suspected that the explosion was caused by a fire in...
Fri Jan 21, 2022, 04:41 PM
Jan 2022
... a coal bunker next to a reserve magazine (i.e. a storage area for ammo/gunpowder), which was a frequent mishap on steam-driven warships.

In 1935, FDR sent the Spanish govt. an official Navy Dept. communication absolving Spain of any culpability in the explosion.

from Imperial Cruise


Funny, I've never seen that mentioned in our history books.

llashram

(6,265 posts)
40. A lot...volumns
Sat Jan 22, 2022, 02:46 PM
Jan 2022

of history HAS NEVER shown up in history books here in America. One of those questions that make me say "hmmm"...Arsenio Hall I think coined that.

harumph

(1,909 posts)
17. Apart from the colonialism controversy, it was a bad statue aesthetically.
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 02:23 PM
Jan 2022

I mean it's just ridiculous - TR looks like a marvel superhero - huge chest - pecks, etc.,
Silly.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
27. Historical Context
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 06:52 PM
Jan 2022

People shouldn't be judged outside their historical context. Nobody in history could survive being judged by modern standards because they're products of their own time.

This is the kind of thing that gives the left a bad name.

question everything

(47,510 posts)
29. Roosevelt was a President! Another cancel culture that will cost us
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 07:42 PM
Jan 2022

We should not judge former public figures in today's opinions of some.

Who is next? Washington? Jefferson?

TR established the Forest Service and the National Parks!

I will not be surprised to see this used successfully in the next elections.

 

cinematicdiversions

(1,969 posts)
30. Wait till they come after Jimmy Carter.
Thu Jan 20, 2022, 07:58 PM
Jan 2022

Former southern democratic Governor

And they will. Because it feeds the holier than though outrage machine.

generalbetrayus

(507 posts)
34. Just a side note to the Teddy Roosevelt controversy
Fri Jan 21, 2022, 12:48 AM
Jan 2022

A wealthy paleontologist named Henry Fairfield Osborn was president of the American Museum's Board of Trustees between 1908 and 1933. According to the WaPo article, the statue was commissioned in 1925. Osborn was a virulent racist himself and a eugenicist. In 1924, he published an article in the museum's popular magazine, Natural History, in which he all but stated outright that Blacks were a separate, lower species, and that East Asians weren't a whole lot higher on the evolutionary scale.

tavernier

(12,394 posts)
35. I was with a tour group in Saint Petersburg, Russia.
Fri Jan 21, 2022, 08:07 AM
Jan 2022

We came upon a headless statue somewhere in the outskirts of the city. She told us that when the governments changed, they often removed the heads of statues and put them in storage and replaced them with more popular heads.Then when the regimes turned around, they would switch them out again.

We all had a big laugh and appreciated the humor of the lady who appeared to be a wonderful representative of the common citizen.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Theodore Roosevelt statue...