Pfizer CEO says a fourth booster shot 'is necessary'
Source: The Hill
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla said on Sunday that a fourth dose of the COVID-19 vaccine will be necessary to continue to help keep hospitalizations manageable and sicknesses more mild.
"Right now, the way that we have seen, it is necessary, a fourth booster right now. The protection that you are getting from the third, it is good enough, actually quite good for hospitalizations and deaths," Bourla said while appearing on CBS's "Face the Nation."
"It's not that good against infections, but doesn't last very long. But we are just submitting those data to the FDA and then we will see what the experts also will say outside Pfizer," he added.
In August, the Food and Drug Administration fully approved Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine for people at least 16-years-old or older. A third dose of Pfizer's vaccine has been granted emergency use authorization.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pfizer-ceo-says-a-fourth-booster-shot-is-necessary/ar-AAV0vIL
Walleye
(31,017 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)ificandream
(9,372 posts)SomewhereInTheMiddle
(285 posts)The difference between the flu shots and the Covid vaccine and boosters, at least for my family, has been that the Covid shots often come with a 24-48hr period of illness strong enough to require bedrest. If this becomes a quarterly event that is a week or more of sick days I am not sure I Can afford. Given that the alternative is worse I probably will continue to get them as recommended, but it is a problem.
Rocknation
(44,576 posts)I mean, I'd hate to think that the CEO of Pfizer might have ulterior motive$
Rocknation
True Dough
(17,303 posts)perfectly reasonable to me.
NH Ethylene
(30,810 posts)To see if all the countries are on board, or if there are contradictory studies. The news that the CDC withheld some pertinent info from us has not encouraged my trust.
Rocknation
(44,576 posts)or during the reign of Dr. Trump?
Rocknation
NH Ethylene
(30,810 posts)Raven123
(4,830 posts)chowder66
(9,067 posts)Raven123
(4,830 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)against infections (with the new variants). However, first booster doesn't last very long against death and hospitalizations. Thus second booster is needed.
chowder66
(9,067 posts)Deminpenn
(15,285 posts)immune system works for all infections as I understand it. From what I read, it's hard to test for how long memory B and T cells last and relatively few labs are able to do it. That's the kind of long lasting immunity that matters.
All the emphasis on tracking antibodies is because it's easier to do and most labs can do that.
cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)mahannah
(893 posts)JohnSJ
(92,187 posts)opportunity comes to get it, you have a choice.
We are very fortunate here in the U.S. that these vaccines are readily available. The rest of the world isn't as lucky, though the administration is working hard to move the vaccines out globally
JohnSJ
(92,187 posts)Ace Rothstein
(3,161 posts)JohnSJ
(92,187 posts)variants that show up, and suspect this will end up like a yearly shot, like the influenza vaccine
Ford_Prefect
(7,895 posts)So is Pfizer suggesting that quarterly shots to keep immunity up to standard will be the future, or at least during the next 2-3 years?
Locrian
(4,522 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
txwhitedove
(3,928 posts)cstanleytech
(26,289 posts)LisaL
(44,973 posts)NT
LittleGirl
(8,286 posts)After 90 days. Thats why it wasnt widely available for protections in a wide scale before Covid-19. That is what someone that works in Pharma told me.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)there would have been more effective vaccines compared to Moderna or Pfizer. And there are not.
NH Ethylene
(30,810 posts)At least as far as I know.
niyad
(113,279 posts)crews at the facilities work in pharma.
AZLD4Candidate
(5,688 posts)another booster?
littlemissmartypants
(22,634 posts)SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)People won't even get the 1st Booster shot, and 20-30% of Americans won't even get the 1st & 2nd regular shots.
I'm guessing that if they do declare a 2nd booster is necessary, that it will get around 25% willing to have it.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)People are not going to continue to line up for booosters indefinitely.
I am vaxxed and boosted but Im thinking Im pretty much done unless something changes drastically. Im a horrific needle phobe and its a major undertaking for me to get an injection. Theres been no interest, it seems, in developing other types of vaccines (like nasal).
I am not trying to influence anyone but Im sure Im not the only one who is feeling this way.
NH Ethylene
(30,810 posts)I'll be following the evidence, but I am inclined to sit the next one out.
hamsterjill
(15,220 posts)I have marveled at the eagerness with which some on DU have been wanting a booster often. I believe in science and am certainly not an antivaxxer; however, at some point one has to begin to wonder how much is being put into our bodies.
Its typically explained that like the flu, it will be a yearly shot, but the fact is that less than half of Americans get a flu shot. So, Ill be watching and make the decision that I deem will be best for me. As should everyone. But there will be a limit for me and it wont go on indefinitely.
beaglelover
(3,469 posts)I've had both shots and the booster and unless a new variant comes along with a huge increase in likelihood of death if you get infected, I'm not sure I want to put anymore experimental vaccines in my body.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)of getting yet another booster.
People can pretend that "vaccinated" always meant "less severe illness," but for those of us in real world, it always meant "prevents infection." Now the booster needs boosted every couple of months to prevent severe illness? Fuck's sake. What's it made of, water?
Jetheels
(991 posts)itself? Second, heres a nyt article that says were good for a long time. I was able to read it and I dont have a subscription.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/02/21/health/covid-vaccine-antibodies-t-cells.html
niyad
(113,279 posts)think that the ceo of pharmaceutical company could speak properly.
greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)I arrived at CVS for my fourth Moderna shot - second booster - as I seemed to meet the criteria. It has been 7 months since my last shot, and I'm age eligible according to all reports. When I registered, I answered all their questions and was greeted with "Success! You're eligible for your Moderna booster." But when I got to CVS, I was turned away because I'm not immuno-compromised. It was one of the registration questions, and I answered honestly that I was not and the registration went through without problem. OK - I'll wait, but there was a peace of mind in the thought of further protection.
By the way, no-one in CVS - not shoppers or staff - were masked, other than myself.