Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

SouthBayDem

(32,006 posts)
Sun Mar 20, 2022, 12:55 PM Mar 2022

Austin vows "significant reaction" if Russia uses chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine

Source: CBS

Washington — Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin warned Sunday a chemical or biological weapons attack by Russia in Ukraine would prompt a "significant reaction" from the United States, as well as global allies and partners.

"If a chemical or biological weapon was used, you'd see a significant reaction from not only the United States, but also the global community," Austin said in an interview on "Face the Nation." "I don't want to speculate about what exactly would change our calculation. I think engaging in hypotheticals is probably not helpful here either, but this is a very serious step and as you heard our president say, we won't take that lightly."

Twenty-five days after Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine, Russian forces are struggling in their effort to take over the capital city of Kyiv but have continued their brutal bombardment of civilians.

In the port city of Mariupol, Ukrainian officials have accused Russia of bombing an art school where 400 people were sheltering, marking the second attack of a public building where civilians were taking shelter in less than a week. Russian forces struck a theater in Mariupol where more than 1,300 people were believed to be inside last week.

Read more: https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ukraine-russia-chemical-biological-weapons-lloyd-austin-face-the-nation/



Full video of Sec. Austin on Face the Nation this morning:



The transcript is also available on CBSNews.com at this link.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Austin vows "significant reaction" if Russia uses chemical or biological weapons in Ukraine (Original Post) SouthBayDem Mar 2022 OP
Good. And don't tell Putin what you won't do. dalton99a Mar 2022 #1
my guess is" all bet's are off " !! if that happens ? monkeyman1 Mar 2022 #2
I suspect that such an attack with chemical or biological weapons would trigger NATO involvement. colorado_ufo Mar 2022 #3
I suspect the same. ShazzieB Mar 2022 #6
If Russia launches an NBC attack, MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2022 #4
Putin would have to be neutered. EndlessWire Mar 2022 #5
So you don't think Russia would respond with nukes? Polybius Mar 2022 #8
If the Russians use any NBC, then that line has been crossed MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2022 #11
But the threat of nuclear war would still be the same as it is now. Irish_Dem Mar 2022 #10
Because at that point, MarineCombatEngineer Mar 2022 #12
I envision a giant anvil falling out of the sky on pukin's thick skull. nt Javaman Mar 2022 #7
I hope that I am connecting dots incorrectly. But, wnylib Mar 2022 #9

colorado_ufo

(5,730 posts)
3. I suspect that such an attack with chemical or biological weapons would trigger NATO involvement.
Sun Mar 20, 2022, 01:42 PM
Mar 2022

There is no way to contain such weapons from drifting into NATO countries.

ShazzieB

(16,286 posts)
6. I suspect the same.
Sun Mar 20, 2022, 03:33 PM
Mar 2022

Because it's true that there IS no way to contain such weapons fro7m drifting into NATO countries.

The more I think about it, the more convinced I am that such an action from Putin would fully justify NATO going in with guns blazing. I wonder if Putin is stupid enough to risk that. 🤔

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,264 posts)
4. If Russia launches an NBC attack,
Sun Mar 20, 2022, 02:24 PM
Mar 2022

then my opposition to US/NATO intervention would evaporate instantly and I would wholeheartedly support an all out attack against all Russian forces in Ukraine and Belarus, which the US and NATO will destroy rather quickly.

EndlessWire

(6,460 posts)
5. Putin would have to be neutered.
Sun Mar 20, 2022, 02:37 PM
Mar 2022

I'd take both Belarus and Russia. Clean out the pus, then give them both back, without parceling them out. Give them back to the people, so they can start anew.

Except for Kaliningrad. That remains a significant anomaly, and would probably have to be redesigned or moved in some way.

I'd bomb the crap out of that Crimean bridge. Unless Ukraine wanted it for some reason.

Irish_Dem

(46,576 posts)
10. But the threat of nuclear war would still be the same as it is now.
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 08:25 AM
Mar 2022

If we cannot tolerate the risk of a nuclear war now, how would that change with Putin's use of NBC?

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,264 posts)
12. Because at that point,
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 08:59 AM
Mar 2022

the threat has become reality, ANY use of NBC is a line crossed, AFAIC, and should be met with a violent reaction against Russian forces in Ukraine and Belarus, but no troops into Russia proper.

wnylib

(21,346 posts)
9. I hope that I am connecting dots incorrectly. But,
Mon Mar 21, 2022, 04:02 AM
Mar 2022

Russia has forcibly removed people from Mariupol. It has given a deadline for Ukraine to surrender Mariupol and to allow unarmed civilians and military to leave. Ukraine has refused. The deadline has come and gone.

So, it looks like Russia is about to carpet bomb Mariupol into dust. Or to release chemical weapons there to kill those who remain and/or force people out in order to take complete control of the city.

I am also thinking that chemical weapons are preferred over biological ones because biological weapons are too hard to control and could turn into another pandemic, spreading far beyond Ukraine.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Austin vows "significant ...