Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,757 posts)
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:34 PM Mar 2022

Manchin will support Jackson's Supreme Court nomination, likely ensuring her confirmation

Source: NBC News

WASHINGTON — Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., announced Friday he plans to vote to confirm Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court, praising her "exemplary" record and career and labeling her "supremely qualified" to be a justice.

The centrist Democrat's support gives Jackson nomination a major boost after four days of contentious hearings, all but assuring her historic confirmation to be the first Black woman on the high court as long as the rest of the Democratic caucus stays on board.

"After meeting with her, considering her record, and closely monitoring her testimony and questioning before the Senate Judiciary Committee this week, I have determined I intend to vote for her nomination to serve on the Supreme Court," Manchin said.

“Her wide array of experiences in varying sectors of our judicial system have provided Judge Jackson a unique perspective that will serve her well on our nation’s highest court,” he said in a statement, offering glowing praise Jackson as “warm and gracious” and holding “the temperament to make an exceptional jurist.”

Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/manchin-will-support-jacksons-supreme-court-nomination-likely-ensuring-her-confirmation/ar-AAVutaZ?li=BBnb7Kz



What about Sinema?
20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Manchin will support Jackson's Supreme Court nomination, likely ensuring her confirmation (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Mar 2022 OP
we'll see llashram Mar 2022 #1
I'm sure she's the next Supreme Court justice jimfields33 Mar 2022 #3
She hasn't said. But Sinema has voted for every one of Biden's judicial nominees. NYC Liberal Mar 2022 #2
Good! pandr32 Mar 2022 #4
Once confirmed, I will give him some credibility. LakeArenal Mar 2022 #5
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin... Upthevibe Mar 2022 #6
I don't trust him at all. Lunabell Mar 2022 #7
call the e-squad Marthe48 Mar 2022 #8
Off topic but I wonder if it's time to link the number of judges cstanleytech Mar 2022 #9
There are 13 federal judicial circuits making a good argument there should be 13 Supreme Court PoliticAverse Mar 2022 #11
Well if they do increase it to that the other change I would make is that cstanleytech Mar 2022 #13
The broken clock is right at least once per day... n/t forgotmylogin Mar 2022 #10
"What about Sinema?" - wait until there are enough cameras following her to know. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2022 #12
Until he doesn't Javaman Mar 2022 #14
THIS 👆🏻👆🏻👆🏻 LenaBaby61 Mar 2022 #16
That's his schtick - he says he will...but then he won't NullTuples Mar 2022 #15
That's good SunImp Mar 2022 #17
That this is even news tells you all... LudwigPastorius Mar 2022 #18
Of course he will; why would you think otherwise? brooklynite Mar 2022 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author LudwigPastorius Mar 2022 #20

NYC Liberal

(20,135 posts)
2. She hasn't said. But Sinema has voted for every one of Biden's judicial nominees.
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:36 PM
Mar 2022

I would be very surprised if she didn't vote to confirm.

Upthevibe

(8,015 posts)
6. Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin...
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 12:47 PM
Mar 2022

Thanks for the post.

I've been home all week (since I tested positive for COVID) from work but have intentionally NOT watched the hearings. I'm already wound up....

I just want it to be over and done....

cstanleytech

(26,236 posts)
9. Off topic but I wonder if it's time to link the number of judges
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 02:10 PM
Mar 2022

on the Supreme Court in some way to the population?
That and institute a single term limits of 13 years for justices on the court.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
11. There are 13 federal judicial circuits making a good argument there should be 13 Supreme Court
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 04:47 PM
Mar 2022

justices.

cstanleytech

(26,236 posts)
13. Well if they do increase it to that the other change I would make is that
Fri Mar 25, 2022, 06:11 PM
Mar 2022

the judges have adhere to the same ethics requirements that other judges have to and recuse themselves if there is a potential conflict of interest.

SunImp

(2,223 posts)
17. That's good
Sat Mar 26, 2022, 09:37 PM
Mar 2022

The American people though are still frustrated that he didn't support Sarah Bloom Raskin's nomination or President Biden's Build Back Better bill.

LudwigPastorius

(9,110 posts)
18. That this is even news tells you all...
Sat Mar 26, 2022, 09:50 PM
Mar 2022

you need to know about Manchin’s on-again-off-again support of the president and our party.

Response to brooklynite (Reply #19)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Manchin will support Jack...