Finland's and Sweden's NATO Bids in Limbo as Turkey Objects
Source: Bloomberg
(Bloomberg) -- NATO failed to immediately move forward with the accession process for Sweden and Finland after Turkey, which earlier had outlined a broad list of complaints with alliance members, blocked the formal acceptance of the applications.
NATO ambassadors met Wednesday morning, but couldnt agree to proceed with the applications after Turkey held up consensus, according to people familiar with the matter. Only after all NATO allies give consent can Sweden and Finland start accession talks with the alliance.
Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan signaled earlier this week that he wouldnt allow the Nordic nations to join, alleging they support Kurdish militants his government regards as terrorists. He added on Wednesday that his concerns extend beyond Sweden and Finland but also to how other NATO members handle the Kurdish groups.
Our only expectation from our allies was that they should have approached Turkeys efforts to protect its borders and establish its security the same way, he told lawmakers of his ruling AK Party in parliament. NATOs expansion is meaningful to the degree our sensitivities are respected.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/finland-s-and-sweden-s-nato-bids-in-limbo-as-turkey-objects/ar-AAXpgih
AZLD4Candidate
(5,768 posts)Why not just blame Armenians too? Turkey has a long history of doing that.
TheBlackAdder
(28,216 posts).
.
DENVERPOPS
(8,845 posts)who is familiar with all of this about Turkey to fill us in on the recent political history of Turkey........esp why it would damage NATO if Turkey withdrew....??????
atreides1
(16,093 posts)If Turkey were to withdraw from NATO...I don't believe it would be a loss...perhaps it might be a gain! Two democracies for one autocratic country...seems like a fair trade to me!!!
DENVERPOPS
(8,845 posts)LudwigPastorius
(9,177 posts)They host long range radar that could be the first warning for missile launches from Russia or Iran, and interceptors that (in theory) could take out some of those incoming.
Plus, Turkey is the only muslim-majority NATO member.
Johnyawl
(3,205 posts)"Plus, Turkey is the only muslim-majority NATO member." Why is this important?
If we throw Turkey out we should do a thorough housecleaning and throw Hungary out also.
LudwigPastorius
(9,177 posts)Turkey's membership serves as an antidote to the claims that NATO is a Christian alliance.
This has become more and more important in the post-9/11 era, as civilizational and identity-related considerations have increasingly colored international politics.
NATO conducts military operations across the globe, and it doesn't want to be painted as a modern day 'crusader' biased against Islamic nations.
ripcord
(5,537 posts)When are they booting the nations who are in breach of the NATO Treaty by not meeting the defense spending requirement? Now we have democrats trying to break up NATO not because countries have violated the Treaty or broken rules but because nation doesn't agree with them.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(9,998 posts)He's about as much of an "ally" as the Saudis. Just as reliable.
Beastly Boy
(9,438 posts)They will squeeze every concession out of NATO before they remove their objections.
riversedge
(70,306 posts)IronLionZion
(45,534 posts)they can only take so much.
efhmc
(14,732 posts)ripcord
(5,537 posts)As long as the EU has the PKK on their Terror List.
mahina
(17,701 posts)By that standard United States shouldnt be a part of NATO. They were our allies and we abandoned them.
Floyd R. Turbo
(26,609 posts)mahina
(17,701 posts)Shut up new kid.
Mysterian
(4,594 posts)who need to get a better president than this asshat fascist Erdogan.
JohnSJ
(92,409 posts)yaesu
(8,020 posts)Patrick Wintour
After initial hesitation about the seriousness of Turkeys objections, its president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, has doubled down on his threat to veto Finlands and Swedens applications for membership of Nato, saying there is no point in either country sending delegations to Ankara to persuade him otherwise.
On Wednesday, he also extended his demands from the two he outlined on Monday to 10, leading to claims that he is using blackmail.
At his press conference on Monday, he made two key demands: that Finland and Sweden end their supposed support for the Kurdish Workers party (PKK), which Turkey regards as a terrorist organisation, and that they lift their ban on arms exports imposed in October 2019 after the Turkish incursion in northern Syria.
No one doubts that Erdoğans intervention could tangle Nato up in knots for months. It is now the task of alliance diplomats to establish Erdoğans seriousness and the price that would have to be paid to make him back down, and prevent a full-blown Nato crisis.
ripcord
(5,537 posts)As long as they are on the EU's terror list there are going to be problems with Sweden harboring its members.
christx30
(6,241 posts)Move weapon system to nearby countries that embrace western ideals, and anyone that something to lose from an aggressive Russia.
BrightKnight
(3,567 posts)and Putin wants to play Cold War v2.0.
867-5309.
(1,189 posts)https://www.reuters.com/world/turkey-has-told-allies-its-no-sweden-finlands-nato-bid-erdogan-2022-05-19/
BrightKnight
(3,567 posts)will be happy about his shake down game. He might get away with it in the short run but Im guessing they will eventually pay a price.