Ex-Trump White House counsel Cipollone is being 'cooperative' with Jan. 6 committee
Source: NBC News
Former Trump White House counsel Pat Cipollone appeared before the House Jan. 6 committee for an interview Friday and has been willing to answer the panel's questions, a source familiar with the first part of his testimony said.
Hes been a cooperative witness within the parameters of his desire to protect executive privilege for the office of general counsel, the source said.
Cipollone, who panel vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., has repeatedly described as a critical witness, arrived for the videotaped and transcribed closed-door interview shortly before 8:30 a.m. ET, and was still meeting with the panel in the early afternoon.
The panel subpoenaed Cipollone late last month after bombshell testimony by Cassidy Hutchinson, a former top aide to then-President Donald Trump's chief of staff Mark Meadows, detailed the lawyer's efforts to rein in Trump on Jan. 6 and the days preceding it.
Read more: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/former-trump-white-house-counsel-pat-cipollone-cooperative-jan-6-commi-rcna37320
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,786 posts)Of his concerns about crimes, etc.
Being that he is NOT the attorney for the POTUS, but for the office of, Pat Cipollone can tell of his concerns for the institution and not violate privilege of any kind.
He can sink TDFG. Others are going to.
Botany
(70,516 posts)RockRaven
(14,973 posts)"within the parameters of his desire to protect executive privilege for the office of general counsel"
He's being cooperative, except when he doesn't want to, based on his own judgement of when he doesn't have to, supposedly to protect prerogatives of the position he was holding but which also would have the effect of protecting himself personally. Convenient. And not at all subject to abuse.
Novara
(5,843 posts)... not any sort of personal lawyer. And I don't know the office has any claim on privilege.
I suppose it depends on whether he gives the committee what they need. They may or may not have to fight him on it.
From what Ms. Hutchinson said, it sounds like he was the one voice of reason that day, and he could possibly exonerate himself and sink the orange motherfucker. I should think it serves him to testify fully and honestly.
Bayard
(22,099 posts)Could be a whole televised Committee hearing itself, even if its just video.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)peppertree
(21,639 posts)He'll bring tears to Cheeto's eyes - that's for sure.
COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)I had thought it was a supply chain issue. Guess not.
lastlib
(23,248 posts)Stormy, with an 80% chance of ketchup......