Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,036 posts)
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 02:18 PM Jul 2022

Biden nominates 5 new judges, but not Republican abortion opponent

Source: Reuters

By Nate Raymond

July 12 (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden on Tuesday nominated five new federal judges, but did not at this time move forward with a plan opposed by a growing number of Democrats and progressives to appoint a Republican abortion opponent to a judgeship in Kentucky.

The latest nominees include Cindy Chung, a prosecutor Biden previously picked to serve as the U.S. attorney for Pittsburgh and is now seeking to make the first Asian American ever on the Philadelphia-based the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

Biden also named four nominees for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, including two state court judges in Philadelphia who previously worked as public defenders representing indigent defendants.

Those two nominees are Judges Mia Perez and Kai Scott. The other two nominees are Kelley Hodge, a partner at the law firm Fox Rothschild, and John Murphy, a partner at Baker & Hostetler.

Read more: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/biden-nominates-5-judges-not-170000106.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Biden nominates 5 new judges, but not Republican abortion opponent (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2022 OP
Yes! no_hypocrisy Jul 2022 #1
He might be checking Mitch's end of the bargain. JohnnyRingo Jul 2022 #2
Harry Reid eliminated the filibuster for cabinet and judgeship picks. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2022 #11
Yes, he did moose65 Jul 2022 #16
I knew it!.. agingdem Jul 2022 #3
So nice to have a POTUS who pays attention and does the right thing. jaxexpat Jul 2022 #4
whew NJCher Jul 2022 #5
did the administration ever say why that anti-abortion guy was considered? onetexan Jul 2022 #6
From all corners it appears they did rpannier Jul 2022 #14
WTF?? who the heck is she to dictate who replaces her? onetexan Jul 2022 #17
What a relief duckworth969 Jul 2022 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author duckworth969 Jul 2022 #8
Cue Mitch whining TlalocW Jul 2022 #9
He won't. None of these are the seats that McConnell wants rpannier Jul 2022 #13
Excellent News! Thanks President Biden. iluvtennis Jul 2022 #10
I don't see any appointments for Eastern KY rpannier Jul 2022 #12
She hasn't gone on senior status yet. onenote Jul 2022 #19
Yeah, but he didn't withdraw the nomination Novara Jul 2022 #15
Hard to "withdraw" a nomination that never was submitted. onenote Jul 2022 #18

JohnnyRingo

(18,636 posts)
2. He might be checking Mitch's end of the bargain.
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 02:36 PM
Jul 2022

I still believe there's a deal for McConnell to drop the filibusters on Biden's picks, both in cabinet positions and federal judgeship's. Any good prosecutor would make sure the defendant is going to follow through as promised in a plea bargain before passing sentence.

By the same token, these judges are for life, so Mitch could renege on his agreement and still keep his appointed judge. I don't trust him and neither does the president.

I can hear McConnell saying: "I didn't mean I wouldn't block this judge" "He/she is way too liberal".

moose65

(3,167 posts)
16. Yes, he did
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 08:31 AM
Jul 2022

And you know why? Because of McConnell's obstructionism. If that hadn't happened, Obama would have not been able to appoint ANYONE during his last term.

agingdem

(7,850 posts)
3. I knew it!..
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 02:37 PM
Jul 2022

this seems kind of deja vu...Mitch would not allow Merrick Garland"s nomination to come to the floor...Mitch had Biden's nod he would nominate his anti-choice guy..that was before the vile court decimated Roe v Wade..oops...and now this abortion opponent's almost-nomination is hanging in the air...to bad

rpannier

(24,330 posts)
14. From all corners it appears they did
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 07:25 AM
Jul 2022

As I've written in other places (twice in this thread) the seat is held by Judge Karen Kaye Caldwell (Bush appointee) and she won't retire until her successor is approved and she has said it has to be Meredith

duckworth969

(600 posts)
7. What a relief
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 03:15 PM
Jul 2022

No to KY Mitch approved judge.

I say we keep pounding away at Moscow
Mitch.

He’s getting some heat about obstructing new legislation too.

Be great if his strangle hold on power starts to slowly erode.

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

rpannier

(24,330 posts)
13. He won't. None of these are the seats that McConnell wants
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 07:23 AM
Jul 2022

It's a federal judge position in Eastern Kentucky that McConnell wants Meredith to get
The catch in all of this, and may be why Biden agreed (if he did) is that the seat is held by Karen Kaye Caldwell and she has said she will not retire until the nomination for the seat has cleared and she wants it to be Meredith
So, it will either by Meredith, or Caldwell (a Bush appointee) for the foreseeable future

rpannier

(24,330 posts)
12. I don't see any appointments for Eastern KY
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 07:20 AM
Jul 2022

My understanding is that he is to be appointed to the seat held by Karen Kaye Caldwell
I know she went on Senior Status end of June, and that she has conditioned her leaving on Meredith being appointed to her position.
This doesn't sound like any of these appointments are about that particular seat

onenote

(42,714 posts)
19. She hasn't gone on senior status yet.
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 01:05 PM
Jul 2022

If she had gone on senior status, the seat would be vacant and she couldn't hold up an appointment.

Novara

(5,844 posts)
15. Yeah, but he didn't withdraw the nomination
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 07:48 AM
Jul 2022

I REALLY FUCKING HOPE he isn't planning to wait until all the outrage dies down in order to sneak in this nomination. Because we women are still outraged and he has not done ENOUGH.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Biden nominates 5 new jud...