Mistrial denied as jury weighs damages against Alex Jones in Sandy Hook defamation trial
Source: Reuters
(Reuters) - A Texas judge denied Alex Jones's motion for a mistrial on Thursday as jury deliberations resumed in a defamation case over the U.S. conspiracy theorists false claims about the Sandy Hook mass shooting.
The mistrial request followed the disclosure at trial that Jones's lawyer accidentally sent two years of the U.S. conspiracy theorist's text messages to the plaintiffs.
Federico Andino Reynal, an attorney for Jones, told Judge Maya Guerra Gamble that attorneys for the plaintiffs should have immediately destroyed the records. An attorney for the parents, Mark Bankston, used the texts to undercut Jones testimony during cross-examination on Wednesday.
Jones, founder of the Infowars radio show and webcast, is on trial to determine the amount of damages he owes for spreading falsehoods about the killing of 20 children and six staff at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, on Dec. 14, 2012.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/mistrial-denied-as-jury-weighs-damages-against-alex-jones-in-sandy-hook-defamation-trial/ar-AA10jfGM
AllaN01Bear
(18,439 posts)emulatorloo
(44,186 posts)Dont feel the least bit sorry for this seditionist serial liar. As seen in another thread:
Link to tweet
EndlessWire
(6,569 posts)ZZenith
(4,128 posts)The little interactions she has with her coworkers says so much about her as a person - she is considerate and efficient, knowledgeable and fair. Everything one could want in a jurist.
viva la
(3,320 posts)The file was sent to them by the other counsel, who was offered a chance to get it back, and ... apparently never noticed.
(Or maybe he hates his client and wants him to lose. )
slumcamper
(1,606 posts)"The Reynal Law Firm, P.C. is recognized as one of the States premier criminal litigation firms."
"Our lawyers successfully handle significant criminal matters in courts across the country. We bring a unique blend of talent, tenacity and teamwork to every case we handle in the relentless pursuit of the best possible outcomes for our clients."
Texas law...you betcha!
for additional amusement: [link:https://frlaw.us/|
BumRushDaShow
(129,535 posts)Unless the judge ruled it inadmissible with jury instructions to disregard, how would this constitute justification for a mistrial?
These entitled asses are so used to bullshitting their way out of taking responsibility for their chronic malfeasance that they think that doing this will always work in every instance.
TomSlick
(11,109 posts)The defense lawyers are simply building a record for appeal.
Inadvertent disclosure by counsel can be an issue if the disclosed matter is somehow privileged, e.g. attorney/client communications. (The rules vary from state to state.) In this case, it seems to me the disclosed material was not only not privileged but should have been disclosed in discovery.
I only know what I read on DU and the news but I don't see this as a serious issue.
BumRushDaShow
(129,535 posts)It's grasping at straws.
There have been video clips of the exchange between the prosecutors and Jones (one of the shorter ones) -
TomSlick
(11,109 posts)I don't see much hope for an appeal but all I know is what I've read DU and the news.
EndlessWire
(6,569 posts)She scares me, and I'm just a spectator. And he's sweating, and trying to spin it his way. Good grief.
BumRushDaShow
(129,535 posts)watching a younger and calmer version of "Judge Judy".
(I can imagine the crap that civil case judges must hear day after day)
ancianita
(36,137 posts)thucythucy
(8,086 posts)"My client is about to get screwed because this civil case is so open and shut. So I'll just do something supremely stupid and then ask for a mistrial."
Repeat as many times as needed until the plaintiffs give up.
Bayard
(22,163 posts)SunImp
(2,228 posts)tavernier
(12,406 posts)Yesterday I posted that he might ask for a mistrial.
And my DU friends who are knowledgeable of the law answered that he would be SOL on that.
LudwigPastorius
(9,178 posts)Lionel Hutz?