Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,194 posts)
Mon Aug 15, 2022, 06:13 PM Aug 2022

DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit

Source: CNN

(CNN) The Justice Department is opposing the release of details in an affidavit that lays out the argument that investigators made to a federal magistrate judge explaining the probable cause it had to search former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate last week. In their new filing arguing for some continued secrecy, the Justice Department made clear the seriousness of the ongoing criminal investigation, saying it "implicates highly classified materials."

"Disclosure of the government's affidavit at this stage would also likely chill future cooperation by witnesses whose assistance may be sought as this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations," the Justice Department wrote. "The fact that this investigation implicates highly classified materials further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential harm if information is disclosed to the public prematurely or improperly."

Media organizations including CNN had asked for the affidavit to be unsealed after the search last week at Trump's Palm Beach, Florida, club and residence. The Justice Department said in its filing that disclosing the affidavit details "at this juncture" would "cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation."

"The redactions necessary to mitigate harms to the integrity of the investigation would be so extensive as to render the remaining unsealed text devoid of meaningful content, and the release of such a redacted version would not serve any public interest," the Justice Department stated. NN, joined by The Washington Post, NBC News and Scripps, asked the judge last week to unseal all documents -- including any probable cause affidavits -- connected to the FBI search.

Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/15/politics/justice-department-mar-a-lago-search-affidavit/index.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 OP
oh great cue the pearl clutching and violent threats mucifer Aug 2022 #1
Good move. It's better to not release anything rather then a massively redacted document. underpants Aug 2022 #2
GOOD! bluestarone Aug 2022 #3
I will take that " leap pf faith"... FarPoint Aug 2022 #4
"Media organizations including CNN" are trump's errand boys ZonkerHarris Aug 2022 #5
Excellent! 👏👏👏👏 SheltieLover Aug 2022 #6
Why does this feel like the DoJ is taunting DT to release it himself? NullTuples Aug 2022 #7
He doesn't have it. herding cats Aug 2022 #8
Ah, I understand now. Thank you! NullTuples Aug 2022 #9
It would also put the lives of informers and witnesses wnylib Aug 2022 #15
All very true. 👍 herding cats Aug 2022 #17
I just realized today that there was another motive wnylib Aug 2022 #18
K&R, ongoing investigation involving multiple witnesses implicating highly classified materials! n/t AntiFascist Aug 2022 #10
Garland Roy Rolling Aug 2022 #11
They are doing their job and he is doing his BumRushDaShow Aug 2022 #12
DOJ to America: "Probable cause? Open your fuckin' eyes, man." Novara Aug 2022 #13
This is the first indication I've seen that the DOJ is taking these charges seriously infullview Aug 2022 #14
DOJ has been taking investigations and wnylib Aug 2022 #16
and this is a sterling example stopdiggin Aug 2022 #19

underpants

(182,846 posts)
2. Good move. It's better to not release anything rather then a massively redacted document.
Mon Aug 15, 2022, 06:18 PM
Aug 2022

The right will have a field day with this but screw them. The need to hold on to voters more than expand.

herding cats

(19,565 posts)
8. He doesn't have it.
Mon Aug 15, 2022, 09:13 PM
Aug 2022

It would be a treasure trove of information to him if he got his tiny little hands on it. Which is why you're seeing so many of his GOP backers calling for it to be released. Doing so would hamper the investigation and give trump a roadmap to style his defense before he's even been indicted.

wnylib

(21,511 posts)
15. It would also put the lives of informers and witnesses
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 11:15 AM
Aug 2022

at great risk and intimidate others from coming forward.

This is like Trump's first impeachment when Republicans were trying desperately to learn the ID of the whistle blower who told Congress about Trump's extortion phone call to Zelenskyy.

herding cats

(19,565 posts)
17. All very true. 👍
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 01:15 PM
Aug 2022

With a perfect example in how the GOP sought the whistle blower in the first impeachment hearing.

wnylib

(21,511 posts)
18. I just realized today that there was another motive
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 03:31 PM
Aug 2022

for requesting the affadavit. They knew that DOJ would object and would have to give reasons in court for objecting. Those reasons gave Trump and his accomplices more info on how extensive and deep the DOJ investigations are. Now they know that there are multiple criminal investigations of multiple people, with more than one informant/witness. They know that DOJ wants more than just the recovery of the documents.

Roy Rolling

(6,925 posts)
11. Garland
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 06:35 AM
Aug 2022

Let him do his job and not make him and the DOJ media stars. If he says he needs to keep it secret because there is more to come, he hasn’t disappointed so far.

Having CNN viewers looking over your shoulder doesn’t help here.

BumRushDaShow

(129,194 posts)
12. They are doing their job and he is doing his
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 06:51 AM
Aug 2022

which are often in conflict.

Garland has dealt with 2 extraordinary media fiasco cases in the past - the "Unabomber" (Ted Kaczynski) and the Oklahoma City bombing (Timothy McVeigh), so he knows the deal.

ETA -


As a senior Justice Department official, Merrick Garland brought ‘very different types of people together in a common effort, from the Oklahoma City bombing investigation to the very challenging Unabomber case,’ former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick says. She is shown with Garland in 1995 in her office at the Justice Department. Bill O’Leary/The Washington Post


Merrick Garland, then-associate deputy attorney general, speaks to the media following the hearing of Oklahoma City bombing suspect Timothy McVeigh, in El Reno, Okla., on April 27, 1995.
Rick Bowmer/AP

infullview

(981 posts)
14. This is the first indication I've seen that the DOJ is taking these charges seriously
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 09:38 AM
Aug 2022

This means that there's a high probability that at least one of these charges listed in the warrant may produce an indictment and criminal charges. More popcorn please!

wnylib

(21,511 posts)
16. DOJ has been taking investigations and
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 11:18 AM
Aug 2022

possible/probable charges seriously for a long time. They just have not been public about it.

stopdiggin

(11,320 posts)
19. and this is a sterling example
Tue Aug 16, 2022, 07:10 PM
Aug 2022

of why the indications (that many have been so vocal about) have not always been there. It's not a media game, and it's not a spectator sport - even though Trump, and the media, would dearly love it to be.

It's really nice to now have a context, where people are saying, "Well, yeah .. that makes sense."

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»DOJ opposes making public...