DOJ opposes making public details in Mar-a-Lago search warrant's probable cause affidavit
Source: CNN
(CNN) The Justice Department is opposing the release of details in an affidavit that lays out the argument that investigators made to a federal magistrate judge explaining the probable cause it had to search former President Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate last week. In their new filing arguing for some continued secrecy, the Justice Department made clear the seriousness of the ongoing criminal investigation, saying it "implicates highly classified materials."
"Disclosure of the government's affidavit at this stage would also likely chill future cooperation by witnesses whose assistance may be sought as this investigation progresses, as well as in other high-profile investigations," the Justice Department wrote. "The fact that this investigation implicates highly classified materials further underscores the need to protect the integrity of the investigation and exacerbates the potential harm if information is disclosed to the public prematurely or improperly."
Media organizations including CNN had asked for the affidavit to be unsealed after the search last week at Trump's Palm Beach, Florida, club and residence. The Justice Department said in its filing that disclosing the affidavit details "at this juncture" would "cause significant and irreparable damage to this ongoing criminal investigation."
"The redactions necessary to mitigate harms to the integrity of the investigation would be so extensive as to render the remaining unsealed text devoid of meaningful content, and the release of such a redacted version would not serve any public interest," the Justice Department stated. NN, joined by The Washington Post, NBC News and Scripps, asked the judge last week to unseal all documents -- including any probable cause affidavits -- connected to the FBI search.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/15/politics/justice-department-mar-a-lago-search-affidavit/index.html
mucifer
(23,556 posts)underpants
(182,846 posts)The right will have a field day with this but screw them. The need to hold on to voters more than expand.
bluestarone
(16,988 posts)FarPoint
(12,412 posts)I trust AG Garland.
ZonkerHarris
(24,232 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)NullTuples
(6,017 posts)herding cats
(19,565 posts)It would be a treasure trove of information to him if he got his tiny little hands on it. Which is why you're seeing so many of his GOP backers calling for it to be released. Doing so would hamper the investigation and give trump a roadmap to style his defense before he's even been indicted.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)wnylib
(21,511 posts)at great risk and intimidate others from coming forward.
This is like Trump's first impeachment when Republicans were trying desperately to learn the ID of the whistle blower who told Congress about Trump's extortion phone call to Zelenskyy.
herding cats
(19,565 posts)With a perfect example in how the GOP sought the whistle blower in the first impeachment hearing.
wnylib
(21,511 posts)for requesting the affadavit. They knew that DOJ would object and would have to give reasons in court for objecting. Those reasons gave Trump and his accomplices more info on how extensive and deep the DOJ investigations are. Now they know that there are multiple criminal investigations of multiple people, with more than one informant/witness. They know that DOJ wants more than just the recovery of the documents.
AntiFascist
(12,792 posts)Roy Rolling
(6,925 posts)Let him do his job and not make him and the DOJ media stars. If he says he needs to keep it secret because there is more to come, he hasnt disappointed so far.
Having CNN viewers looking over your shoulder doesnt help here.
BumRushDaShow
(129,194 posts)which are often in conflict.
Garland has dealt with 2 extraordinary media fiasco cases in the past - the "Unabomber" (Ted Kaczynski) and the Oklahoma City bombing (Timothy McVeigh), so he knows the deal.
ETA -
As a senior Justice Department official, Merrick Garland brought very different types of people together in a common effort, from the Oklahoma City bombing investigation to the very challenging Unabomber case, former Deputy Attorney General Jamie Gorelick says. She is shown with Garland in 1995 in her office at the Justice Department. Bill OLeary/The Washington Post
Merrick Garland, then-associate deputy attorney general, speaks to the media following the hearing of Oklahoma City bombing suspect Timothy McVeigh, in El Reno, Okla., on April 27, 1995.
Rick Bowmer/AP
Novara
(5,844 posts)It's there for everyone to see.
infullview
(981 posts)This means that there's a high probability that at least one of these charges listed in the warrant may produce an indictment and criminal charges. More popcorn please!
wnylib
(21,511 posts)possible/probable charges seriously for a long time. They just have not been public about it.
stopdiggin
(11,320 posts)of why the indications (that many have been so vocal about) have not always been there. It's not a media game, and it's not a spectator sport - even though Trump, and the media, would dearly love it to be.
It's really nice to now have a context, where people are saying, "Well, yeah .. that makes sense."