Biden administration to declare toxic 'forever chemicals' as hazardous
Source: Washington Post
For decades, Sandy Wynn-Stelt looked at the Christmas tree farm across the street from her home in western Michigan with delight. How idyllic is that, she said. Thats about as quintessential Michigan as you could get. Only in recent years did she learn of the toxic time bomb that nobody knew was sitting on the land underneath those trees. Her town of Belmont is one of hundreds across the country contaminated with an omnipresent batch of dangerous chemicals known as polyfluoroalkyl and perfluoroalkyl substances, or PFAS.
On Friday, the Biden administration proposed to classify two of the most common of these chemical compounds, which can persist in the environment for years, as hazardous substances. The long-awaited move from the Environmental Protection Agency is meant to spark the cleanup of scores of sites defiled by industrial compounds and make the public more aware of their presence. Used to make everyday products like nonstick cookware, cosmetics, fabrics and food packaging, these types of chemicals pervade drinking water used by millions of Americans and theyve been linked to an array of illnesses, including cardiovascular problems and low birth weights.
Its a very significant step, EPA Administrator Michael Regan said in a phone interview. The proposed rule requires the polluter to pay for violating the law. Still, people living near toxic waste and their advocates say the federal government under multiple administrations has been painfully slow to act, even as the health risks of PFAS become ever clearer. The agency is proposing to add two chemicals known as PFOA and PFOS to its official list of hazardous substances under the federal Superfund program, which cleans up toxic waste sites.
The listing will make it easier for the federal government to compel polluters to pay to restore contaminated sites and funnel taxpayer money into projects if the culprits cannot be found. Transparency and disclosure are critical in this process, Regan said. And so, this rule will do that. Under the proposed rule, companies will need to report when the substances leach into the environment, even in relatively small quantities. The requirements will help public health officials track where the chemicals persist.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2022/08/26/forever-chemicals-epa-cleanup-rule/
No paywall link
Was waiting for EPA's press release and it did finally issue - https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-proposes-designating-certain-pfas-chemicals-hazardous-substances-under-superfund
EPA Proposes Designating Certain PFAS Chemicals as Hazardous Substances Under Superfund to Protect Peoples Health
Designating PFOA and PFOS under CERCLA would improve transparency, accountability, and deliver on Administrator Regans PFAS Strategic Roadmap
August 26, 2022
Contact Information
EPA Press Office (press@epa.gov)
WASHINGTON (August 26, 2022) Following through on the Biden-Harris Administrations commitment to tackle environmental injustice and improve public health, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking a significant action under Administrator Regans PFAS Strategic Roadmap to protect people and communities from the health risks posed by certain PFAS, also known as forever chemicals. EPA is proposing to designate two of the most widely used per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) as hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), also known as Superfund. This rulemaking would increase transparency around releases of these harmful chemicals and help to hold polluters accountable for cleaning up their contamination.
The proposal applies to perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), including their salts and structural isomers, and is based on significant evidence that PFOA and PFOS may present a substantial danger to human health or welfare or the environment. PFOA and PFOS can accumulate and persist in the human body for long periods of time and evidence from laboratory animal and human epidemiology studies indicates that exposure to PFOA and/or PFOS may lead to cancer, reproductive, developmental, cardiovascular, liver, and immunological effects.
Communities have suffered far too long from exposure to these forever chemicals. The action announced today will improve transparency and advance EPAs aggressive efforts to confront this pollution, as outlined in the Agencys PFAS Strategic Roadmap, said EPA Administrator Michael S. Regan. Under this proposed rule, EPA will both help protect communities from PFAS pollution and seek to hold polluters accountable for their actions.
Many known and potential sources of PFAS contamination are near communities already overburdened with pollution. If finalized, the rulemaking would trigger reporting of PFOA and PFOS releases, providing the Agency with improved data and the option to require cleanups and recover cleanup costs to protect public health and encourage better waste management.
It would also improve EPA, state, Tribal nation, and local community understanding of the extent and locations of PFOA and PFOS contamination throughout the country and help all communities to avoid or reduce contact with these potentially dangerous chemicals.
EPA is focused on holding responsible those who have manufactured and released significant amounts of PFOA and PFOS into the environment. EPA will use enforcement discretion and other approaches to ensure fairness for minor parties who may have been inadvertently impacted by the contamination. EPA is also committed to doing further outreach and engagement to hear from impacted communities, wastewater utilities, businesses, farmers and other parties during the consideration of the proposed rule.
If this designation is finalized, releases of PFOA and PFOS that meet or exceed the reportable quantity would have to be reported to the National Response Center, state or Tribal emergency response commissions, and the local or Tribal emergency planning committees. A release of these or any other hazardous substance will not always lead to the need to clean up or add a site to the National Priorities List (NPL), liability or an enforcement action. EPA anticipates that a final rule would encourage better waste management and treatment practices by facilities handling PFOA or PFOS. The reporting of a release could potentially accelerate privately financed cleanups and mitigate potential adverse impacts to human health and the environment.
(snip)
Much more: https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-proposes-designating-certain-pfas-chemicals-hazardous-substances-under-superfund
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Never should have been allowed to mfr such harmful chemicals!
Ty, Joe!
BumRushDaShow
(129,662 posts)they were useful for the purposes they were made for - e.g., the "foam" to put out certain types of fires or for non-stick surfaces.
Of course they had no idea until decades later, what the end result would be and the damage that would be done.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)In red shithole TN, they still dilute gas with MTBE! Destroys water & kills gas mileage. I grt 47 mpg in TN. 53 mpg in NC.
Consistently.
BumRushDaShow
(129,662 posts)but there are a number of chemicals so it has been a matter of actually getting the studies/research done on each of them to establish the hazard.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)They've known about mtbe for quite awhile. Banned in mormal states since 1999.
BumRushDaShow
(129,662 posts)is that because they are so prolific, it takes time (and they allow time) to phase them out but only once they find a "suitable replacement".
That is what has been happening with "banned" substances like MTBE and even one like asbestos (where it was still appearing in some form in certain auto parts for example) and EPA put out their final rules to completely ban it (barring some very specific exceptions). Asbestos was officially banned back in 1989 but over the years, court cases delayed the enforcement of the ban and rules.
But remember *why* they started using it in the first place.
https://archive.epa.gov/mtbe/web/html/gas.html
Now my state requires oxygenated gasoline, and they use (because of fed subsidies) ethanol. Not because it's better, but because it's cheaper.
Of course, since the energy released comes from the formation of H-O and C=O bonds, putting O in the mix of reactants must cut the release of energy. (The big thing back then was to be green by asserting that ethanol would be sufficient as a fuel--by the time it was needed, technological advances would surely make it economical.)
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)I hate oxygenated fuel. ~40 miles less per tank.
H2O Man
(73,637 posts)Tikki
(14,560 posts)Nuclear Waste....
Schemes that produce or use radioactive material can generate radioactive waste.
Radioactive waste is hazardous because it emits radioactive particles, which if not properly managed can be a risk to human health and the environment.
Tikki
womanofthehills
(8,781 posts)But UB researchers now have found that that processcalled hydraulic fracturing, or frackingalso causes uranium that is naturally trapped inside Marcellus shale to be released, raising additional environmental concerns. https://www.buffalo.edu/ubreporter/archive/2010_11_04/fraking_uranium.html
A few yrs ago, in North Dakota, some oil drillers were caught just dumping fracking water on A dirt road near some farmers fields.
Yrs ago, I worked at Carrie Tingley Childrens Hospital and we had American Indian kids flown into the hospital for bone cancer from the uranium tailings.
Bayard
(22,181 posts)Greybnk48
(10,177 posts)and potentially infant children (from PFOA and PFOS). We keep small birds and usually a parrot through the years (along with our dogs and whatever I want to clean up after).
Because of this, and my children, we got rid of all of our Teflon pans in the mid 90's when we started with birds and went with stainless or cast iron. We have an airfyer that supposedly does not have these chemicals, but to be safe we use it in the upstairs bathroom with a vent fan on, lol!
I use a Nesco for our turkey at Thanksgiving. When our nieces were quite young, they told their teacher they had "bathroom turkey" for Thanksgiving because the one I had then was non-stick. I now have an enamel one instead.
This is really good news for the planet, humans, and all other animals! So happy!
CountAllVotes
(20,878 posts)Warpy
(111,383 posts)but the problem, as always, is scaling it up to clean the environment. They've been found in snow in Antarctica and all through the food chain.
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/a40961089/how-to-destroy-forever-chemicals-for-good/
IbogaProject
(2,845 posts)What the article speaks of is the Teflon microparticles being under a whole tree farm. "The scientists discovered a way to disintegrate two concentrated, toxic forms of PFAS into smaller, innocuous compounds that decompose." This is neither for cleaning drinking water nor for dealing with it in the environment.
burrowowl
(17,653 posts)About fucking time!