House panel plans to hold hearing on push to seat Cherokee Nation delegate
Source: CNN Politics
CNN The House Rules Committee intends to hold a hearing in mid-November on the push for Congress to seat a Cherokee Nation delegate, a Democratic staffer familiar with the planning process confirmed to CNN.
The plans for a hearing come as the Cherokee Nation has renewed its campaign for representation in Congress, calling on lawmakers to honor a treaty the US government made nearly 200 years ago. The New York Times was first to report that the committee is expected to hold the hearing.
In a video released in September, the tribal nation reasserted its demand that Congress seat its delegate in the House of Representatives a right stipulated by the 1835 Treaty of New Echota. For two centuries, Congress has failed to honor that promise, Principal Chief Chuck Hoskin Jr. said in the video, referring to the delegate. However, the Treaty of New Echota has no expiration date. The obligation to seat a Cherokee Nation delegate is as binding today as it was in 1835.
In 2019, Hoskin nominated Kimberly Teehee to be the Cherokee Nations first delegate to Congress. If Teehee were to be seated, her role would likely be similar to other non-voting members of Congress.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/11/03/politics/house-hearing-cherokee-nation-delegate/index.html
Wow. That would be fantastic!
RainCaster
(10,884 posts)"Delegates cant vote on final passage of legislation in the House, but they can serve on committees, introduce bills and offer amendments."
Hmmm. In general, I like this idea. My concern is the details, as I would hate to see any such delegate stuffed into a corner. IMO, they have a legit beef here, and we need their voice to be heard in the chamber.
BumRushDaShow
(129,088 posts)Then you have -
Puerto Rico (Resident Commissioner)
American Samoa (Del.)
U.S. V.I. (Del.)
Guam (Del.)
N. Mariana Islands (Del.)
RainCaster
(10,884 posts)I did not know...
BumRushDaShow
(129,088 posts)James48
(4,436 posts)Do you think a right-wing Supreme Court will rule in a case like that? A treaty is binding. Did the Senate ratify the treaty?
Evolve Dammit
(16,741 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,088 posts)so the First Peoples are a no-brainer.
Evolve Dammit
(16,741 posts)Duppers
(28,125 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,253 posts)2naSalit
(86,646 posts)Tribe.
Duppers
(28,125 posts)moniss
(4,252 posts)honor the treaty. If a book were written about all of the broken treaty terms/promises for all indigenous groups in the US it would be as thick as the old Webster's Dictionary. You young people (YYP for those who want initials for commonly used phrases) may not get the reference. No pun intended (NPI). Canada is no better and both countries horrific history with "schools" for indigenous children is truly sickening.