Donald Trump's niece loses lawsuit over inheritance
Source: Reuters
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Donald Trump has defeated his niece Mary Trump in a lawsuit where she accused the former U.S. president and two of his siblings of defrauding her out of a multimillion-dollar inheritance.
In a decision on Monday, Justice Robert Reed of a New York state court in Manhattan said Mary Trump released her claims against her relatives in a 2001 settlement over the estate of Donald Trump's father Fred Trump Sr.
Reed said the settlement, which gave Mary Trump with more than $2.7 million, was neither "a product of overreaching and unfair circumstances" nor "a case where defendants' alleged threats preluded the exercise of plaintiff's free will."
Lawyers for Mary Trump had no immediate comment.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-s-niece-loses-lawsuit-over-inheritance/ar-AA14837t?ocid=EMMX&cvid=354d6fd93a7940b09abf350c2570b735
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,553 posts)Srkdqltr
(6,317 posts)Her lawsuit now was for more. Over what she already got?
jimfields33
(15,948 posts)Any judge would have found this unable to go forward or even give more money.
TheRickles
(2,080 posts)Srkdqltr
(6,317 posts)electric_blue68
(14,933 posts)family turn out to be on the decent side?
see posts 7 & 9 for financial short changing chicanary
Response to electric_blue68 (Reply #15)
Srkdqltr This message was self-deleted by its author.
Srkdqltr
(6,317 posts)It's Trump business and I dont care really. I'm not getting any.
Mawspam2
(740 posts)...they lowballed her inheritance when she deserved more.
rickford66
(5,528 posts)The family understated the value of the estate etc. She had the records to prove it after many years.
Bengus81
(6,932 posts)When they sold out of the family biz. Charles and his brother David cooked the books to make Koch look worth much less. The other two brothers later sued and won.
SWBTATTReg
(22,166 posts)ripped his family off too?
jaxexpat
(6,849 posts)It looked to me that she signed a release thinking it was a fair settlement only to later discover the numbers she'd been given were incorrect. Isn't that fraud on someone's part?
How do these son-of-a-bitches get away with that? The judge's credentials seem as shiny as a new penny. I mean, would it kill somebody if the bad guys could lose once in a while?
Is it that the laws are purposely written to protect the guilty? (Or written in hieroglyphics?) Asking for a nation stuck in a self-generating cycle of cynicism, anger and depression.
rsdsharp
(9,197 posts)In addition, the statute of limitations doesnt begin to run until the defrauded party discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable care, should have discovered the fraud.
She says she discovered the fraud after retrieving documents for the NY Times. However, she retrieved them from HER attorney, so she wasnt defrauded, because she had the information of the true value of the estate all along. Its just that she, and presumably her attorney, didnt look at it.
jaxexpat
(6,849 posts)Even as I typed that out, it smelled off. Though I know from personal experience, attorneys come in classes of competence which, and much like doctors, is never mentioned by their peers.
rsdsharp
(9,197 posts)jaxexpat
(6,849 posts)rsdsharp
(9,197 posts)If shes deemed to have had constructive possession of the records, its definitely run.
jaxexpat
(6,849 posts)She'll just have to scrounge by somehow with a meager $2.7 million (less attorney fees).
Thanks for the straightforward responses.