The latest: Pelosi says Democrats won't make a deal to elect McCarthy
Source: Washington Post
Former House speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) told reporters there's no chance that Democrats will strike a deal to provide the votes to elect GOP leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) as speaker.
"You're missing the whole point," she said. It's Democrats' responsibility to find common ground with Republicans on policy and even on House rules such as the motion to vacate, she said, "but they have to select their leader first."
Pelosi also called the deadlock over electing a speaker "unfortunate" because it distracts from the $35 price cap on insulin passed last year as part of Democrats' climate package, which takes effect this month.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/01/05/house-speaker-vote-live-updates-kevin-mccarthy/#link-OYTCDG7QK5A6NLYLYS36CDRQGE
The Republican deadlock 'distracts from the $35 price cap on insulin'. The Queen of Shade.
SheltieLover
(80,490 posts)onetexan
(13,913 posts)SheltieLover
(80,490 posts)"Service" to them means stuffing their pockets with our $ & creating chaos for pootin.
onetexan
(13,913 posts)SheltieLover
(80,490 posts)in2herbs
(4,399 posts)The Unmitigated Gall
(4,710 posts)After that Floriduh fuckface yesterday.
Raven123
(7,803 posts)SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)ck4829
(37,766 posts)wryter2000
(47,940 posts)She can do it now.
I think it might be a good idea to unite with some R's on someone else...for important concessions. To begin:
The person must be a moderate
No killing bills by not bringing them up for a vote
Raise the debt limit
The insurrectionists win in defeating McCarthy, but that's likely to happen, anyway. But imagine the howls when the debt limit gets raised without any real problem.
Of course, the logical thing is 6 or more R's voting for Jeffries, but that's not going to happen.
It's been fun watching them implode, but at some point, we're going to need a working House of Representatives.
csziggy
(34,189 posts)The RepuQs would try to take this country back a hundred years or more. Of course that wouldn't make it past the Senate, so effectively it would be a non-functioning Congress anyway.
Since teh RepuQs do not believe that government can or should work, this display shows the country how completely incompetent their party is.
wryter2000
(47,940 posts)We must have a House of Representatives. As things are now, no business at all can be done.
Hekate
(100,133 posts)So, not just no but hell no
SunSeeker
(58,283 posts)The safe R districts assure the most radical right winger wins the primary.
SheltieLover
(80,490 posts)bluevoter4life
(805 posts)To simply vote present and get Jeffries in there?
Dems win because Jeffries, the moderates win since it gives the political cover.
Response to speak easy (Original post)
irisblue This message was self-deleted by its author.
peppertree
(23,349 posts)Let'em elect Jenny, if they want a McCarthy.
She'd be a lot more entertaining, all in all an improvement - and much easier on the eyes.
orleans
(36,927 posts)
dchill
(42,660 posts)Win, win!
peppertree
(23,349 posts)Unlike Kevin the Klown.
Pluvious
(5,396 posts)OnlinePoker
(6,127 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,961 posts)I could not have said it better
NH Ethylene
(31,350 posts)In the words of the great Barrack Obama.
patphil
(9,072 posts)No matter what he promises to get Democratic support, you can bet he will renege on it the moment he gavels down the start of the new House session.
And, of course, he has already told us about all the shit he is going to spread around as leader. So, what's to save?
Absolutely nothing!
grantcart
(53,061 posts)Pelosi in the head with the gavel.
dai13sy
(570 posts)Count on Nancy to bring brightness into the long, dark tunnel of the Republican party where they all scurry before her strength and intelligence. Okay, okay - I am a big fan and she is the gold-standard
BumRushDaShow
(169,804 posts)
has been thrown!
Hekate
(100,133 posts)Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)Why don't the Democrats work on a deal with the most progressive (or least Nazi) members in the House to elect someone less unfavorable?
So let's say this plan doesn't work and simply the threat of it forces a vote to finally elect McCarthy. It still can be chalked up to a win for the Democrats and a massive loss for the nutbag wing of the RQP.
durablend
(9,270 posts)
Why don't the Democrats work on a deal with the most progressive (or least Nazi) members in the House to elect someone less unfavorable?
Because there are none. They've (R) already said they have more in common with the bomb throwers than anyone on the "other side"
Major Nikon
(36,925 posts)The reality is McCarthy is one of the worst. Throwing a dart at a chart of Republicans would produce a better candidate. It doesn't even have to be a member of Congress. Pick a moderate Republican that 6 of them would vote for is all they need.
dchill
(42,660 posts)They're reporters. It's what they do!
MontanaMama
(24,722 posts)They're mostly embarrassing, aren't they?
Aussie105
(7,927 posts)Both Nancy and Joe are on the same page on this.
Not a Dem problem, sort yourselves out you 'R' people, you wanted this!
Much smirking and the eating of popcorn by 'D' people at the moment.
Sogo
(7,191 posts)Before I read this, I was of the opinion the Dems should step into the fray by proposing a solution. Now I see how that would be a mistake. They must choose their own leader.