US company gets $120 million boost to make 'green steel'
Source: AP
By ED DAVEY today
The manufacture of green steel moved one step closer to reality Friday as Massachusetts-based Boston Metal announced a $120 million investment from the worlds second-largest steelmaker, ArcelorMittal.
Boston Metal will use the injection of funds to expand production at a pilot plant in Woburn, near Boston, and help launch commercial production in Brazil. The company uses renewable electricity to convert iron ore into steel.
Steel is one of the worlds dirtiest heavy industries. Three-quarters of world production uses a traditional method that burns through train loads of coal to heat the furnaces and drive the reaction that releases pure iron from ore.
Making steel releases more climate-warming carbon dioxide than any other industry, according to the International Energy Agency about 8% of worldwide emissions. Many companies are working on alternatives.
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/production-facilities-climate-and-environment-business-d095684168e9f6a2634ee9316007f994
Warpy
(111,174 posts)mostly as back yard foundries for hobbyists. Large furnaces capable of smelting ore use electric arc power to do it. They'll still most likely use coke from coal to supply the carbon for the steel, but it will still be cleaner than what they're doing now.
It's my understanding that the big bauxite smelter in northwest Iceland is electric, powered by geothermal steam, the "waste" steam used to heat houses and other businesses. It's such a cheap process there that it makes sense to ship the ore up there and ship the refined aluminum out. The ready supply of steam for electricity makes it so much cheaper than dirty smelting operations that shipping costs become negligible.
Here's an article about a green steel plant in operation, https://www.gmh-gruppe.de/de-en/gmh-gruppe/what-we-do/newsroom/news/green-steel-from-the-electric-arc-furnace.html They're going to have more scrap iron than they know what to do with once the Ukraine war is over and the Russian hulks get towed off.
certainot
(9,090 posts)Warpy
(111,174 posts)to make coke, which is pretty pure carbon plus byproducts that are used for things from medications to dyes for clothing. There is no way making high strength steel is ever going to be a purely green process, but it can be better than it has been.
Sometimes mitigation is the best you can do.
Or was that question purely rhetorical?
certainot
(9,090 posts)weight in transportation. shaping it with bistable domes or indentations to force the thinner stronger metals into desired shape with less bounce back usually problematic with thin stronger metals
OneCrazyDiamond
(2,031 posts)Reuse before recycling is better than new for the environment.
Best is reduce usage.
eppur_se_muova
(36,247 posts)Without that established recycling process, the cost of aluminum would be prohibitive for many applications. Of course, steel can be recycled, and much is. But there's a catch.
Unfortunately, the processing of steel requires high temperatures and frequently slow, controlled cooling, which makes heat recapture difficult. I'm sure the bean-counters in industry have looked at all this, but I'm a little skeptical that the potential for improvement will be as great as in other industries.
FredGarvin
(471 posts)funding garbage grants.
Smelting iron requires enormous amounts of fuel.
Brazil has forests...
former9thward
(31,949 posts)It is not taxpayer money. It is money from a steel company, Arcelor Mittal, as the article states.
Archae
(46,301 posts)When Mao Zedong told everyone in Red China to make steel.
Didn't quite work out too well...