Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Reid postpones PIPA vote (Original Post) center rising Jan 2012 OP
PIPA vote postponed in the Senate maddezmom Jan 2012 #1
Leahy needs to include Internet stakeholders in the discussion of this bill. LynneSin Jan 2012 #3
Doesn't the Megaupload raid prove the current system works? 2ndAmForComputers Jan 2012 #8
I think it is an awful bill kenfrequed Jan 2012 #9
Good Botany Jan 2012 #2
Waiting for the heat to die down Ron Obvious Jan 2012 #4
The "public" wasn't who paid it any mind BumRushDaShow Jan 2012 #6
"SOPA would censor the internet?" DemonSpawn Jan 2012 #7
I agree with you pmorlan1 Jan 2012 #18
Stall, hope for a better chance later. nt bemildred Jan 2012 #5
I wish our Congress was Internet-literate. Fearless Jan 2012 #10
I would like to see the average member of Congress DemonSpawn Jan 2012 #11
+1 Fearless Jan 2012 #12
Hey - I've been using 'puters since 1992 GoneOffShore Jan 2012 #14
You think Word is a bitch? DemonSpawn Jan 2012 #15
Eeek! Of course, Photoshop GoneOffShore Jan 2012 #17
I can't speak for what congress understands, but chances are ALEC wrote this legislation.... midnight Jan 2012 #20
We have to keep hammering at them. GoneOffShore Jan 2012 #13
Stall for more campaign contributions from both sides. harun Jan 2012 #16
It's sad tawadi Jan 2012 #21
congress critters' positions on this wwytchwood Jan 2012 #19
It is disusting that so many progressive so-called liberal senators and reps were for this Dont call me Shirley Jan 2012 #22
Intellectual propery lobbyists often prefer Democrats. C_eh_N_eh_D_eh Jan 2012 #23
Well, it isn't upside down. In fact, I betcha that's what the GOP wants us to think. AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #25
The shit needs to be CANCELLED - not postponed slay Jan 2012 #24

maddezmom

(135,060 posts)
1. PIPA vote postponed in the Senate
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 10:59 AM
Jan 2012

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid announced today that he is postponing Tuesday's procedural vote on the Protect IP Act (PIPA), the controversial anti-piracy bill that inspired thousands of websites on Wednesday to go dark.


PIPA and its House companion, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), are intended to strengthen protections against copyright infringement and intellectual property theft, but Internet advocates say they would stifle expression on the World Wide Web. CBS Corporation is among the media and entertainment companies that support the legislation.


In protest of the legislation, major sites like Wikipedia and Reddit participated in a 24-hour "Internet blackout" on Wednesday, while other sites like Google took less drastic steps to signify their opposition to the legislation. The protests inspired voters to deluge their congressmen with phone calls and emails in protest of the bills as well, and by Wednesday afternoon, several congressmen either came out in opposition to the bills or said Congress should take more time to reconsider the legislation. It seemed unlikely PIPA would find the 60 votes necessary to pass Tuesday's test vote in the Senate.


"There is no reason that the legitimate issues raised by many about this bill cannot be resolved," Reid said in a statement. Reid encouraged PIPA's author, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., to continue working with stakeholders on the bill "to forge a balance between protecting Americans' intellectual property, and maintaining openness and innovation on the Internet."


more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-57362675-503544/pipa-vote-postponed-in-the-senate/

LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
3. Leahy needs to include Internet stakeholders in the discussion of this bill.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:13 AM
Jan 2012

Obviously the democrats are linked with this bill for a very obvious reason - the Entertainment industry really wants this bill and Entertainment is always big money for democratic candidates.

I think on paper the ideas that Leahy wants to create are good ones. Piracy is a major concern and should be addressed. But the way it should be addressed is not by turning the internet into a nanny-state with Internet Website owners being the police.

If you want to combat piracy you need both entertainment and internet parties involved else any laws created will be too lopsided to actually work right.

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
9. I think it is an awful bill
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 12:45 PM
Jan 2012

That is only there to assist in further media monopolization and the big media colonization of the Web.

The internet is where we tease apart the corporate approved news and the right wing drek that is Fox. If they are allowed to kill websites just for referencing a peice of their "property" in the process of tearing it apart then we are hosed.

Piracy sounds a lot worse than it actually is and those that engage in it are usually trying to cover for a service they do not have access to. There is little of redeemable value in this bill at all that has not already been handled (better) by other legislation.

 

Ron Obvious

(6,261 posts)
4. Waiting for the heat to die down
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 11:54 AM
Jan 2012

They're just waiting for the heat to die down and the public to forget all about it. Then it will pass as an amendment to the "we like fluffy bunnies" act, or the "protect innocent kiddies from nasty paedophiles" act.

BumRushDaShow

(129,133 posts)
6. The "public" wasn't who paid it any mind
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 12:37 PM
Jan 2012

It was the big web site owners and "informed" public ("informed" meaning a tiny tiny fraction of general internet users who understood the ramifications).

If it comes up again, Google, DU, Wikipedia, et al will all protest it again. The public doesn't even know or care how the "internets" work as long as they can get to their Facebook nonsense or follow tweets from Lady Gaga.

Not sure why the assumption that it will pass anyway in the same form that it is in now but at some later time and the big sites will sit there and let it go.

pmorlan1

(2,096 posts)
18. I agree with you
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 02:38 PM
Jan 2012

I think you're right. I think they will just lay low for awhile and work behind the scenes to plan their attack. They want this Bill or one just like it passed so they aren't going to just drop it. We've seen this tactic before. When they bring it back it will be a rush vote and nobody will have time to stop them. I hope I'm wrong but I don't think so.

Fearless

(18,421 posts)
10. I wish our Congress was Internet-literate.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 12:51 PM
Jan 2012

Really though. How can you pass (try to pass) laws for things you don't even understand?

 

DemonSpawn

(45 posts)
11. I would like to see the average member of Congress
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 12:56 PM
Jan 2012

check their e-mail. Themselves. Without calling the help-desk.

Hell, I would like to see them use MS Word.

GoneOffShore

(17,340 posts)
17. Eeek! Of course, Photoshop
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 02:22 PM
Jan 2012

and it's siblings are just impossible.

My mind doesn't work that way anymore.

 

wwytchwood

(31 posts)
19. congress critters' positions on this
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 03:05 PM
Jan 2012
http://projects.propublica.org/sopa/L000261
this links to Levin my DINO Senator, but the others are on this site - as Yogi said: "you could look it up" (Berra not Bear)

Dont call me Shirley

(10,998 posts)
22. It is disusting that so many progressive so-called liberal senators and reps were for this
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 05:45 PM
Jan 2012

censorship bill, makes one wonder if the whole Conservative/Liberal thing is upside down. People who are for "us little guys" such as Al Franken, Pat Leahy, Tom Udall are wholly supporting this shut down democracy bill.

C_eh_N_eh_D_eh

(2,204 posts)
23. Intellectual propery lobbyists often prefer Democrats.
Fri Jan 20, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jan 2012

See: Fritz Hollings, Howie Berman, and their "splendid" work on behalf of RIAA/MPAA.

 

AverageJoe90

(10,745 posts)
25. Well, it isn't upside down. In fact, I betcha that's what the GOP wants us to think.
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 04:48 AM
Jan 2012

Don't know how someone like Franken got suckered into a bill that was originally a Rethug brainchild but maybe we can turn things around, because if not, they will have played directly into the hands of Lamar Smith, et al.
The real sad thing is that many of the Dems who did support this bill may have legitimately thought it might help cut down on unsafe products entering the U.S.......oh how wrong they were. And frankly, it also seems that at least most of the Republicans on both sides of the debate are being disingenuous in some way or the other(especially those like Issa, Inhofe, Bachmann, et al.), particularly those opposing the bill, likely due to the fact they've been desperate for votes for some time now.

 

slay

(7,670 posts)
24. The shit needs to be CANCELLED - not postponed
Sat Jan 21, 2012, 02:42 AM
Jan 2012

no amount of tweaking can fix a turd this big my god! what are they thinking? voting for this shit - or ANY version of it will mean political suicide once people see the horrible effects it will have on the internet. piracy is TINY compared to legit sales. most people don't have the time or desire to figure out how to get a so called "pirated" movie without risking getting a virus. the MPAA and chairman Chris Dodd - a DEM senator for 30 years - need to stop being so fucking greedy and accept that in this economy they are doing GREAT. really great so stop being so fuckin greedy Dodd and other SOPA supporters. any Dems involved in this madness better stay the hell away from it. You do NOT fuck with the internet.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Reid postpones PIPA vote