Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,906 posts)
Wed Jun 7, 2023, 01:45 PM Jun 2023

Supreme Court justices release new financial disclosures - but not for Thomas, Alito

Last edited Wed Jun 7, 2023, 03:49 PM - Edit history (1)

Source: ABC News

A fresh batch of financial records for justices of the U.S. Supreme Court was published by the federal judiciary on Wednesday, which shed some light on their income and affiliations outside the court did not include key details that critics said will contribute to an elevated atmosphere of mistrust.

These highly anticipated disclosures, which cover all of 2022, arrive in the wake of revelations about Justice Clarence Thomas' financial ties to Texas billionaire and GOP megadonor Harlan Crow, which critics have called an overt breach of rules and norms – and have prompted renewed calls for more robust transparency and enforcement.

But on Wednesday afternoon, when the records were published online, Thomas’ were not among them, suggesting that the conservative firebrand requested an extension. Justice Samuel Alito’s documents were also unavailable online. A court spokesperson was not immediately available for comment. Even so, experts said that financial disclosures for the other seven justices would draw more attention than normal under the weight of plummeting public trust and questions about their ethical requirements.

"These will definitely be the most scrutinized Supreme Court disclosures since the disclosure law went into effect 40 years ago," Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a leading Supreme Court watchdog, told ABC News. "That said, I think what people will take away from them is how many unanswered questions remain about the justices' lives outside of the courtroom and their potential entanglements."

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/supreme-court-justices-release-new-financial-disclosures-thomas/story?id=99899949





Found where a news site posted them (they also included some from now-retired Justices who filed 2022 disclosures) -

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-06-07/supreme-court-justices-2022-financial-disclosures-released

(ALL PDFs)

Roberts
Sotomayor
Kagan
Gorsuch
Kavanaugh
Coney Barrett
Brown Jackson
Thomas (90-day extension)
Alito (90-day extension)


Kennedy
Souter
Breyer
16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court justices release new financial disclosures - but not for Thomas, Alito (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 OP
"Rules are for little people." Midnight Writer Jun 2023 #1
You can read the dislosures here nuxvomica Jun 2023 #2
Thank you! BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #3
Unfortunately, that link only has last year's nuxvomica Jun 2023 #6
Bloomberg (not the Bloomberg Law which has them with a hard paywall) has them BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #8
You should update the OP with them nuxvomica Jun 2023 #9
I'll go ahead and do that BumRushDaShow Jun 2023 #10
No Thomas or Alito... WTF?! TeamProg Jun 2023 #4
Need more time to generate back stories Pas-de-Calais Jun 2023 #11
Sammy The Weasel's accountant The Wizard Jun 2023 #5
And why should we trust what most of them release? erronis Jun 2023 #7
All nine of them signed the FOAD letter to the Senate. Mawspam2 Jun 2023 #12
Imagine that. 2naSalit Jun 2023 #13
Only reason NOT to release the documents is if there is evidence of impropriety. cstanleytech Jun 2023 #14
Is anyone surprised? dlk Jun 2023 #15
K & R bookmarking FakeNoose Jun 2023 #16

nuxvomica

(12,422 posts)
9. You should update the OP with them
Wed Jun 7, 2023, 03:37 PM
Jun 2023

Or post another thread with them. To me, this is gold. I am continuously frustrated when the media announces something, especially regarding bills in Congress, but provides no link to the actual text.

BumRushDaShow

(128,906 posts)
10. I'll go ahead and do that
Wed Jun 7, 2023, 03:47 PM
Jun 2023

I had been out back and finished watering my plants about 45 minutes ago since it has been bone dry, so have been back and forth to/from the 'puter fooling with plants.

erronis

(15,241 posts)
7. And why should we trust what most of them release?
Wed Jun 7, 2023, 02:40 PM
Jun 2023

Is there some penalty (like tax evasion or perjury or firing) that would accompany a fraudulent reporting?

Mawspam2

(729 posts)
12. All nine of them signed the FOAD letter to the Senate.
Wed Jun 7, 2023, 04:32 PM
Jun 2023

As far as I'm concerned, all nine are dirty. Prove me wrong.

dlk

(11,561 posts)
15. Is anyone surprised?
Wed Jun 7, 2023, 09:09 PM
Jun 2023

The most self-righteous and sanctimonious justices appear to be the most corrupt.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court justices re...