Gov. Greg Abbott Announces Texas Will Secure Its Border With Buoys
Last edited Thu Jun 8, 2023, 10:54 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: Huffington Post
Gov. Greg Abbott announced a water-based barrier of buoys will be used to secure Texas' border.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced Thursday that Texas will immediately begin the process of securing its border with Mexico with a water-based barrier of buoys in the Rio Grande.
Were securing the border at the border, the Republican governor said at a news conference Thursday. What these buoys will allow us to do is to prevent people from even getting to the border.
Abbott said that the Texas Legislature appropriated $5.1 billion to secure the border and that Steve McCraw, the director of the Department of Public Safety, and Thomas Suelzer, a general in the National Guard, came together to employ this strategy.
Read more: https://www.yahoo.com/news/gov-greg-abbott-announces-texas-213831390.html
Article doesn't say how these will prevent people from crossing. It does suggest that given the high cost it's nothing but a gift to private contractors.
On edit here are the buoys
.
Comfortably_Numb
(3,797 posts)walkingman
(7,591 posts)YDogg
(6,682 posts)MLAA
(17,271 posts)Great minds and all
mountain grammy
(26,613 posts)Igel
(35,296 posts)They won't last.
edhopper
(33,554 posts)will they cause?
Shipwack
(2,161 posts)Let's see...
Electrical grid that goes down in a stiff wind (and is way over priced).
More than triple the national maternal childbirth mortality rate (72.7 deaths per 100,000 births).
Education underfunded (though we got cool football stadiums).
Real estate prices out of reach of many.
Property taxes rising.
Mass shootings through the roof.
Sure, buy some buoys... The fight against "Drag Queen Story Hour" must be getting dull...
Every day I regret coming to this state a little bit more, but I can't leave now...
Skittles
(153,138 posts)you know, seeing how they're all "Christian" and "pro-life"
ificandream
(9,360 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,629 posts)Not a really good moat. I have no idea what he means by "buoys." As stated above, sounds like another contractor scam.
KPN
(15,642 posts)Rio Grande River along its length.
marybourg
(12,609 posts)Army Corps of Engineers since, unless theres some superseding case or statutory law ( Im not doing the research) at least a good part of the Rio Grand is a navigable water of the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the Corps. Im sure the Gov. and the legislature know this.
https://www.swf.usace.army.mil/Portals/47/docs/regulatory/NavList2011.pdf
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)Repugs aren't concerned with details, or even laws.
airplaneman
(1,239 posts)lonely bird
(1,685 posts)As long as it is for Abbott to try to cross.
moniss
(4,202 posts)is by definition "navigable waters" of the US and comes under Federal jurisdiction for what you can and cannot do in those waters. Placing large items like this in the river is subject to permits that have to be obtained from the Feds. The Feds and the relevant state agencies that are counterparts usually have Memorandums of Understanding etc. between them that requires the state to follow all Federal laws/regulations etc. while leaving most of the day to day administration to the state agencies. This is applicable to basically all operations with respect to environmental matters. It's also done for other matters as well. In other words the Feds are like the overseers and the states do the implementation. They involve each other to greater or lesser degrees as needed but the principle is bedrock policy for Federal and state administration of these matters.
When a state commits a gross violation of that MOU/A then they are subject to losing federal funding, which is considerable, having all projects halted and having large penalties levied. So Abbott is risking losing hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for agency operations and for project funding. Obviously the Feds don't want to spend that kind of money with a state/agencies who don''t hold up to their agreements about compliance with regulations and laws.
Putting projects on hold can greatly escalate the cost of completing those projects due to things like the costs to "mothball" existing work so that it doesn't deteriorate, paying for equipment storage, losing contractors to other work etc. Along with all of this is many more millions of dollars in engineering costs for development of plans to "mothball" the projects and to inspect them and resurrect them once, and if, the project is allowed to move forward.
KPN
(15,642 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,489 posts)If those stupid things are inflated buoys, they won't last long and the first hurricane that comes through will take them all to Kansas.
I predict they won't last as log as TFG's steel scrapyard border fence.
Just another tax payer-funded campaign contribution for Republicans.
KY........:
kaotikross
(246 posts)Maybe they have nets hanging, still a dumb idea. All it will take is a story about how a couple of migrants (especially kids) got tangled in a net and drowned. Leave ti to the GQP to think of the worst possible solution.
joshdawg
(2,647 posts)abbott: undoubtedly the absolute worst "governor" the state of Texas has ever had.......and that includes perry and bush.
yankee87
(2,166 posts)Im willing to bet all that money went to one of his buddies who just happens to sell these buoys.
Also, a pretty dumb idea.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)Picture of the tents etc.
[link:https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/2017/09/20/texas-golf-course-had-no-chance-stuck-behind-border-wall/681415001/|]
[link:|]
TXPaganBanker
(210 posts)is the official border between the United States and Mexico. Officially, he'll be deploying these in Mexico. I wonder what another sovereign nation has to say about us building anti-personnel barriers in their territory.
Igel
(35,296 posts)The border is the thalweg of the Rio Grande.
I learned a new word today (and promptly upon seeing the definition realized it's a German compound "Thal" + "Weg"
thalweg
täl′vĕg
noun
The line defining the lowest points along the length of a river bed or valley.
A subterranean stream.
A line upon a topographical surface which is a natural watercourse, having everywhere the direction of greatest slope, and distinguished by having the lines of straight horizontal projection which cut it at right angles on the upper sides of the curves of equal elevation to which they are tangent.
(Courtesy of whatever source Google decided to present.)