Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,042 posts)
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 09:28 AM Mar 22

Federal judge tossed lawsuit challenging D.C.'s nonresident voting law

Source: The Hill

03/21/24 10:51 PM ET


A federal judge in Washington, D.C., dismissed a lawsuit challenging a district law that allows noncitizens to vote in local elections, ruling the plaintiffs did not prove the law violates their rights. In an opinion issued Thursday, Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled against a group of seven plaintiffs — all of whom are U.S. citizens and registered to vote in D.C. — who argued the city’s “Local Resident Voting Rights Amendment Act of 2022” violates their Fifth Amendment rights.

The law, passed by the D.C. Council in 2022, removed the citizenship requirement for voting in municipal elections, allowing noncitizen residents to vote in local, but not federal elections, according to court documents. This includes being able to vote for local officials, along with local initiatives, referenda, recalls or charter amendment measures. The law also allows noncitizen residents to run for D.C. government roles and serve on the city’s Board of Elections, per court filings.

The suit, filed against D.C.’s Board of Elections, alleged the law “dilutes the vote of every U.S. citizen voter in the District.” The plaintiffs argued the enfranchisement of noncitizens infringed on their fundamental right to vote, and discriminated against U.S. citizens and native-born U.S. citizens living in D.C. while violating the “constitutional right to citizen self-government.”

The plaintiffs requested the judge to stop the Board of Elections from registering noncitizens to vote and counting votes cast by noncitizens, per the filing. Jackson ruled the plaintiffs failed to show anything was “taken away or diminished” from them because of the law.

Read more: https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4548990-federal-judge-tossed-lawsuit-challenging-d-c-s-nonresident-voting-law/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge tossed lawsuit challenging D.C.'s nonresident voting law (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Mar 22 OP
So can Putin show up and vote? SouthernDem4ever Mar 22 #1
I think they still have to be residents of D.C. BumRushDaShow Mar 22 #2
Which means he can lease an efficiency suite and then vote. SouthernDem4ever Mar 22 #3
Because a large number of D.C. residents are actually federal employees BumRushDaShow Mar 22 #4
Have to have a green card to vote IbogaProject Mar 22 #5

BumRushDaShow

(129,042 posts)
4. Because a large number of D.C. residents are actually federal employees
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 01:50 PM
Mar 22

and contractors, I expect it may be targeted to many of the contract employees who might be in the U.S. on a green card waiting for their citizenship process to complete (so aren't citizens yet), but live and work there full time and pay taxes there. For tax purposes, they would have needed to be domiciled in the District for at least 183 days per their statute.

The lawsuit that was tossed, had claimed "harm" from that, which the judge indicated wasn't proven, and in those cases, the voting is strictly for "local" purposes (not federal elections).

IbogaProject

(2,816 posts)
5. Have to have a green card to vote
Fri Mar 22, 2024, 03:15 PM
Mar 22

NYC is trying to have it and it is tied up in court. I'm not in favor, personally. May emigrate with money and buy visas. They should get in line and become citizens if they wish to vote. This isn't about random diplomats or tourists.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Federal judge tossed laws...