Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(129,549 posts)
Sun Apr 21, 2024, 10:09 AM Apr 21

State law takes US a step closer to popular vote deciding presidential elections

Source: ABC News

April 21, 2024, 6:23 AM


After much public debate, a Maine law has brought the country closer toward having the popular vote determine the winner of national presidential elections -- but it's unlikely that will happen before November or even at all.

Earlier this week, Maine Gov. Janet Mills allowed a bill to become law without her signature that would take effect once the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is able to gather pledges for at least 270 electoral votes — the number of delegate votes needed to elect a president.

The movement has now gathered pledges from 17 states and Washington, D.C., — accounting for a total of 209 electoral votes. The movement seeks to change the way a president is chosen, without a constitutional amendment — but experts say it's unclear what happens when enough states have signed on. It's unlikely this would happen before the 2024 election.

The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact seeks to guarantee that the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states and the District of Columbia wins the presidency.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/state-law-takes-us-step-closer-popular-vote/story?id=109437887

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State law takes US a step closer to popular vote deciding presidential elections (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Apr 21 OP
I like the sentiment, but it won't work if only Blue States enact this. groundloop Apr 21 #1
Well, mathematically it could work Fiendish Thingy Apr 21 #3
But poster 1 made a good point Polybius Apr 21 #8
Simple majority vs the tyranny of the minority. Nt Fiendish Thingy Apr 21 #11
well, i suspect there will b more of those come nov 6. mopinko Apr 21 #4
So we need to make more states blue. lastlib Apr 21 #10
Still a long way to go Fiendish Thingy Apr 21 #2
Has Michigan legislature voted on this yet? yorkster Apr 21 #5
Popular vote is how the Presidency should be decided. republianmushroom Apr 21 #6
That's not what would happen with this Blue_Adept Apr 22 #14
Never gonna happen n/t Polybius Apr 21 #7
A more useful step currently TZ617 Apr 21 #9
Wouldn't it be nice... maccafan Apr 21 #12
I have been a supporter of NPV for years. Mawspam2 Apr 21 #13
Do you really think this would survive a Supreme Court challenge? Polybius Apr 24 #15
Dead on arrival. The Grand Illuminist Apr 24 #18
That the conversation is happening more and more is heartening. Torchlight Apr 24 #16
We the PEOPLE say "yes". oasis Apr 24 #17
Only one problem. The Grand Illuminist Apr 24 #19
amazing... myohmy2 Apr 24 #20

Fiendish Thingy

(15,659 posts)
3. Well, mathematically it could work
Sun Apr 21, 2024, 10:27 AM
Apr 21

If all of the remaining undecided blue states ratify, it would only take one purple state, VA to reach the 270 needed to activate the agreement.

mopinko

(70,239 posts)
4. well, i suspect there will b more of those come nov 6.
Sun Apr 21, 2024, 10:27 AM
Apr 21

btn the money dems r raising and spending down ticket and tsf skimming his down ticket candidates, i think ppl r gonna b shocked at the outcomes.

Blue_Adept

(6,402 posts)
14. That's not what would happen with this
Mon Apr 22, 2024, 06:56 AM
Apr 22

it still takes time to count things and you have mail-in and overseas ballots that take time to come in as well.

TZ617

(14 posts)
9. A more useful step currently
Sun Apr 21, 2024, 12:49 PM
Apr 21

It might be more useful at this time to consider legislation to unify Maine's electoral votes for a standard winner take all result as in most states. This could counteract a possible/likely similar move in Nebraska that could take a likely electoral vote from Biden. That one vote, in certain circumstances, could cause the election to be thrown to the House, which would be able to choose the next President. Based on current and very likely numbers after the 2024 election, that would result in a win for the Loser Defendant. I, as most here, hate the Electoral College, but it is very unlikely any of us will ever see it eliminated.

maccafan

(55 posts)
12. Wouldn't it be nice...
Sun Apr 21, 2024, 04:08 PM
Apr 21

I remember debating whether the Electoral College should be abolished in my high school government class over 50 years ago. I think we all agreed it should go, but I’m not sure it will ever happen.

Mawspam2

(742 posts)
13. I have been a supporter of NPV for years.
Sun Apr 21, 2024, 04:54 PM
Apr 21
https://www.nationalpopularvote.com/written-explanation

Every presidential election is decided by just 5 to 7 'battleground' states. All the others are ignored as givens by both parties.

I think candidates and their organizations should be obligated to campaign in all States and Territorys.

Polybius

(15,497 posts)
15. Do you really think this would survive a Supreme Court challenge?
Wed Apr 24, 2024, 01:14 PM
Apr 24

And aren't we supposed to be against loopholes?

Torchlight

(3,361 posts)
16. That the conversation is happening more and more is heartening.
Wed Apr 24, 2024, 01:25 PM
Apr 24

I'd love to see a series of giant national discussions over federal elections, election funding, and election mechanisms. I think just the conversation alone would be a huge boost to more engagement and votes cast.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»State law takes US a step...