Sheldon Adelson Vows To 'Double' Donations To GOP After Huge 2012 Election Failure
Source: Huffington Post
Casino mogul Sheldon Adelson spent nearly $150 million on Republicans during the 2012 elections, almost entirely in support of candidates who did not win. But his cold streak hasn't left him at all discouraged, he told the Wall Street Journal in a recent interview.
"I happen to be in a unique business where winning and losing is the basis of the entire business," Adelson told the Journal. "So I don't cry when I lose. There's always a new hand coming up."
In fact, Adelson, whose personal wealth is estimated at $20.5 billion, says he's ready to literally double down on the GOP when those new cards are dealt.
The GOP's up-and-comers have already begun to position themselves for a share of the billionaire's largess. Politico reported this week that a number of GOP governors thought to be gearing up for potential 2016 presidential bids recently stopped by Adelson's Venetian Hotel in Las Vegas to kiss the ring.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/05/sheldon-adelson-gop_n_2244070.html
This is a man who must enjoy the taste of spit (and worse) in the food prepared by 99%ers for him.
hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)I assume he already has controlling interest in whatever company makes his bizarre shade of red hair dye, so what more does he need to spend money on?
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)He can double for at least 6 more presidential election cycles until he runs out of money...
...assuming he still wants to spend $9.8 billion on the 2036 outcome, when he'll be dead.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)than the dorks he's donating too. Nothing speaks of republican than giving three hundred to six hundred mil to the same people who lost the first 300m.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)Aviation Pro
(12,172 posts)...to gamble in his fucking casinos he will have enough money to spend on walking bags of dicks to fuck up this country.
However, you worthless fuck, the definition of insanity is to continue to do what you're doing and expect different results.
Go fuck yourself, assclown.
dmallind
(10,437 posts)Voiceover talent, junk mail printers and the like stay employed, and it's not like more money would have helped. The ads already were wall to wall.
Lint Head
(15,064 posts)jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Must be a drag to have $24 billion and not be able to buy enough people to like you.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,034 posts)When a wealthy guy steps into a casino and spends money wantonly he is known as a whale or a mark. Adelson's a mark for the GOP.
riverbendviewgal
(4,253 posts)That is very old.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)I don't see him lasting (or at least being coherent) for another election.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)He will not live to see 2016.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)BainsBane
(53,035 posts)If he were smart he'd be giving money to Democrats to influence their votes.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)there isnt any way to really know since the PACs are being allowed right now to hide who gave the money.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)He would instead quietly give to both parties.
ck4829
(35,077 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)sofa king
(10,857 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Apparently the justice department is taking a serious look at some of Mr Adelson's casino operations and has uncovered some questionable practices.
Which could of course explain his eagerness to get the Obama admin out of there and put some friendlier folks in charge.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)Assuming there are say 20 million people roughly (though I believe I read it was closer to 40 a year ago) if we divided it up among them that would average $7.50 for each person.
cliffordu
(30,994 posts)Time is the great equalizer.
Get horizontal, Sheldon, you useless, gutless shitsucking cretin.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Be my guest.
If there's really anything that this last election taught us, it's that a massive donation from a single source is not worth nearly as much as a million small donations from many sources. Why is that? My theory:
(1) Getting people to give even a small amount is worth more than just another advertising dollar: it buys loyalty, enthusiasm, follow-through on voting, and even sometimes footwork. When people put skin in the game, they want to protect their investment. The huge number of foot soldiers the Obama campaign got were largely also small contributors. You had to wait in line in many places just to volunteer!
This strategy worked down the line. For instance, though I don't live in her district, I gave a small donation to Tammy Duckworth's campaign to defeat Joe Walsh in IL-8. A very savvy campaign got right out on asking me (and presumably all the other not-too-distant voters) to volunteer to phone bank and canvass. It works.
(2) Just having the money to buy up big ads is no longer the solution in contemporary electoral politics. Social media and ground work, especially, are equally important. And as I argued in (1), above, the key to a good ground game, for campaigns up and down the ticket, is an active volunteer corps, often brought in by small donors.
Panasonic
(2,921 posts)I'm 1-1, but heck, as long as Grayson's ready to kick ass and take names and call out these fools for what they are - then I consider my money well-spent.
frazzled
(18,402 posts)Just as Tammy Duckworth's had been made far more Democratic by a recent redistricting, and there was never that much question that she would win it. Neither one of these candidates really needed our money. But you can never take anything for granted.
This is the problem most are talking about in this thread. Elections and the electorate are not really the issue very much in House races. It's how the districts are drawn. Without redrawing, most districts are very hard to "flip."
NYC Liberal
(20,136 posts)A million small donations means a million people have committed to supporting you and voting for you.
One man may give a lot of money, but he can only vote once.
HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)Nor his anti-everything-helpful platform; which, from the sounds of it, is destined to get worse and MORE cruel with the next plutocrat schmuck they run, hard as THAT is to believe.
This is what Sheldon doesn't seem to be processing in that rattletrap upstairs.
alp227
(32,032 posts)Here's Cenk's take on the story:
hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)You still just DON'T get it, do you?
P.S. We still won!!!!
Deny and Shred
(1,061 posts)Many companies who are worried about future higher taxes on dividends resulting from the 'Fiscal Cliff' have declared "Special Dividends" to their shareholders. These will be paid before the year ends. As far as I know, he stands to take home the most.
$1.2 Billion ion top of any other income. He can pay for this type of thing for a long time. He must think votes are assets that can be purchased. In too many cases, he is right.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)When a government decision effects him to the tune of one billion, small wonder he tries to influence government to the tune of 150 million!
DemoTex
(25,399 posts)Baby needs a new pair of shoes!
sinkingfeeling
(51,457 posts)louis-t
(23,295 posts)The Wizard
(12,545 posts)to save thousands are known by one word: Nuts.
louis-t
(23,295 posts)IF, and it's a big IF, he can buy a president. Dudn't look too good for him so far.
aint_no_life_nowhere
(21,925 posts)BS statement. He doesn't cry when the casino loses because the casino has the game rigged in its favor. The casino never loses in the end. But here in the game of politics he's found a game he'd like to rig in his favor but can't. It's got to be killing him, especially with his gigantic ego.
Zoeisright
(8,339 posts)He's also proof that only the good die young.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)money cannot steal democracy fool!!!!! Triple it, quadruple it dummy, snake, idiot! We'll stand in line for 10 hrs to defeat your bought politicians. I hope the DOJ finds something smelly on you!
tomm2thumbs
(13,297 posts)They are swimming upstream to a waterfall of change that they'll never be able to rise up to.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 5, 2012, 08:45 PM - Edit history (1)
Sad and pathetic.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)He should know better than to run a Martingayle....
Cary
(11,746 posts)If we vote, we win. Adelson only matters if we don't vote.
City Lights
(25,171 posts)Why stop there, Sheldon? Just spend it all! Easy come, easy go!
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)only at the cost of every penny he has.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)winning is the only thing- Vince Lombardi
a winner does what a loser won't-from the Clint Eastwood movie
robinlynne
(15,481 posts)rhetorical question, guys.
The Second Stone
(2,900 posts)Hoarding it all doesn't get it in circulation.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)He says "Winning and losing is the basis of the entire business...". Well, it seems to be more about LOSING these days! Given Adelson's collosal record of failure in both the 2012 GOP primary and general elections, his targeted contributions seem to be a jinx for those GOP candidates that he supports. I say to him, since's it's just fun with gambling away a few bucks, "stay the course" and keep those dollars coming!
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)He won't have so much to stir up trouble.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)for 1% of what you spent in the last election cycle; I can deliver equal results. Deal?
Ash_F
(5,861 posts)JohnStJohn
(9 posts)was any reason needed for over turning Citizens United this is it. No single individual or corporation for that matter should be allowed to dump that kind of money into the political process in the United States. Frankly I wish the DoJ would launch an investigation into Adelson and his corrupt business practices.
DaveJ
(5,023 posts)It forces Dems to depend on billionaire donors. In doing so, the 1% vs 99% culture is perpetuated. He gets his way even when R's lose. Hate to say it.
nolabels
(13,133 posts)The more they try to grasp and lunge the easier it will become for us to get things done. When your at the bottom you won't have far to fall but people at the top have got it scary because it can be a long way down.
on edit: In this last election we were way outspent and the corporate media went into the tank as much as possible for the republicans and they still lost badly. No I don't like that some us lower income people might be paying more taxes but those dollars (especially the poor peoples) being taken away will hurt the rich even more. And just remember karma is a ..........
mikeysnot
(4,757 posts)..
texshelters
(1,979 posts)can be so stupid about the laws of economics.
Spending more won't help because of the law of diminishing returns. Money must be spent in a better way, and it won't change a terrible message.
PTxS
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/politics/july-dec12/campaign_11-21.html
julian09
(1,435 posts)madrchsod
(58,162 posts)Third Doctor
(1,574 posts)He just want to put the GOP in power so he can pay lower tax rates it seems. He thinks over time the money he spends will payoff. What I don't understand is that how much damned money does someone need in a lifetime? How old is this guy?
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)intention of turning.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)election. In his pictures, he looks so pale and weak.
Who stands to inherit his fortune? I wonder what his children and heirs think about what he is doing with his money.
Veracious
(234 posts)Fuck these assholes we will beat them again, no matter how much they spend!
Cha
(297,313 posts)defeat.
jmowreader
(50,559 posts)He just spent $150 million producing, distributing and marketing shit sandwiches to half the country - the ones who vote.
Of those people, 47 percent saw the ads about these and decided to try one. A few people liked them - cophrophagy does affect some small percentage of the population, right?
Fifty-three percent didn't buy them. They know shit sandwiches are bad without having to eat one.
Now Adelson plans to spend $300 million on his shit sandwich business, and he has a problem: he has to convince the non-cophrophage shit sandwich buyers from the last election that his sandwiches no longer taste like what they are.
It's a hard task, and eventually his customer base will be people who make their own shit sandwiches when none are for sale.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)The more bread you have means the less shit you have to eat.
The Wizard
(12,545 posts)I'll run as a republican and deliberately defend Jerry Sandusky's right to sexually abuse children.
dae
(3,396 posts)then you are talking about real money!
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)marias23
(379 posts)and then he can go f*^K himself. Join me in a pledge to double your contributions in 2016.
Tx4obama
(36,974 posts)theHandpuppet
(19,964 posts)... or clothed, or be given shelter, or be afforded life saving medicines. That a man would spend a great fortune to deny another man a crumb of bread, yet not spare a penney to buy him a loaf... for all Mr. Adelman's wealth, he is morally and spiritually bankrupt.
still_one
(92,219 posts)Historic NY
(37,451 posts)as a felon.
deutsey
(20,166 posts)Not at all.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)Better to spend your money going to health spas where you can drink green juice. OTOH, I don't care if you leave the planet and sooner is better than later.
Warpy
(111,274 posts)In any case, fools and their money don't realize there are diminishing returns where the more you spend, the less you get. I think support for Citizens United has withered somewhat since it was far less effective and far more costly than the plutocracy was hoping.