Harry Reid Questions GOP's Rationality On Fiscal Cliff After Disability Treaty Fails
Source: Huffington Post
WASHINGTON -- The failure of Republicans to ratify a treaty on disabilities raises questions about their rationality in fiscal cliff negotiations, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid argued Wednesday.
Republicans opposed ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities Tuesday, based on the debunked grounds that it threatens United States sovereignty and the rights of homeschoolers.
"Consider yesterday's failure, the disabilities convention, at the hands of the Tea Party," Reid said on the Senate floor. "This shouldn't have been a battle, but extreme elements of the Republican Party picked a fight where there was nothing to fight about."
Reid noted that even some of its supporters -- including GOP cosponsors -- turned on the measure, which is unpopular with people on the right who think the U.N. is trying to take over the United States.
Read more: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/05/harry-reid-fiscal-cliff-gop_n_2244928.html?utm_hp_ref=politics
Reid is right. The GOP can't even help to ratify a treaty on disabilities. How can they possibly be negotiating in good faith when it comes to the fiscal cliff talks?
The is also another example of why filibuster reform is needed in the Senate now.
NHDEMFORLIFE
(489 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)from Bob Kafka of the radical disability rights group ADAPT.
http://www.adapt.org/main.crpd
(www.adapt.org/main/medicaid_rally/medicaid_savings)
Now that the vote on the CRPD is done, Republicans in Congress have a fundamental choice. They can embrace ADAPTs proposals for true entitlement reform and broaden their base to include people with disabilities or they continue to represent the interests of party extremists and push people with disabilities off the fiscal cliff, said Bob Kafka of ADAPT of Texas.
Response to Cali_Democrat (Original post)
maxsolomon This message was self-deleted by its author.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)I'd forgotten that this was the actual vote - but treaties have to be approved by a 2/3rds majority.
Question: On the Resolution of Ratification (Resolution of Ratification Treaty Doc. 112-7 )
Vote Number: 219 Vote Date: December 4, 2012, 12:06 PM
Required For Majority: 2/3 Vote Result: Resolution of Ratification Rejected
Treaty Number: Treaty Doc. 112-7
Treaty Title: The Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 13, 2006, and signed by the United States of America on June 30, 2009 (the "Convention"
Vote Counts: YEAs 61
NAYs 38
Not Voting 1
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00219
While the filibuster does need to be reformed, it wouldn't affect treaty votes.
Cha
(297,320 posts)Thank you, Cali_Democrat!
JudyM
(29,251 posts)MrModerate
(9,753 posts)I question their sanity.
It seems to me that most Republicans live in a bubble-fantasy world with fingers in their ears humming as loudly as they can, "No! No! No!"
indepat
(20,899 posts)faith.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)The Tin Foil Hat party has taken over.
JanT
(229 posts)Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)voted against ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons With Disabilities. I guess I'd have to buy another to send to his leader, Rick Santorum.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)call it like it is, these radical repugs are just