Former Colorado clerk Tina Peters, hero to election deniers, convicted in election computer breach
Source: AP
Former Colorado clerk Tina Peters, hero to election deniers, convicted in election computer breach
DENVER (AP) Former Colorado clerk Tina Peters, a hero to election deniers, was found guilty by a jury on most charges Monday in a breach of her countys election computer system.
Peters was accused of using someone elses security badge to give an expert affiliated with My Pillow chief executive Mike Lindell access to the Mesa County election system. Prosecutors said she was seeking fame and became fixated on voting problems after becoming involved with those who had questioned the accuracy of the 2020 presidential election results.
The case marked the first prosecution of a local election official over a suspected security breach amid the conspiracy theories that swirled around the 2020 election. It heightened concerns over potential insider threats, in which rogue election workers sympathetic to partisan lies could use their access and knowledge to launch an attack from within.
Peters was convicted of three counts of attempting to influence a public servant, one count of conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation, first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty and failing to comply with the secretary of state...
Read more: https://apnews.com/article/tina-peters-election-computer-breach-8a171657321dd595dfd2dd81e0a0a848
good


CrispyQ
(39,960 posts)AllaN01Bear
(26,372 posts)moonshinegnomie
(3,511 posts)since shes cant vote as one
bluestarone
(19,935 posts)Hope not.
PatrickforB
(15,245 posts)Now, she will have a sentencing hearing coming up, and prior to that I also believe she can vote.
However, if she is incarcerated at the time of the election, she will not be able to vote.
JoseBalow
(7,896 posts)So can people on probation and parole.
https://coloradosun.com/2024/08/12/can-people-convicted-of-felonies-vote-in-colorado/
Tadpole Raisin
(1,889 posts)Reporters say what the max penalty could be by taking the max for each count and adding it up like it will be served consecutively instead of concurrently.
They do it every time!! The only people who get that kind of max sentence are mass murderers who get life for each count + 240 years.
Guessing 2-4 years. She better act contrite unless she wants more.
moreland01
(836 posts)she'll be a felon and won't be able to vote again until she's served her entire sentence including parole.
Despite the fact that she is a "first time offender", I'm hoping the court doesn't go easy on her because a) she knew that what she was doing was illegal, b) she abused her office as an elected official, and c) she still does not admit guilt and is still claiming she did nothing wrong and d) she knows that her job requires her to act in her official capacity as a nonpartisan administrator of elections.
As an elected County Clerk, she has sowed doubt in our election system simply because she is a partisan hack. Hope they throw the book at her as a lesson for those considering repeating what she did in Nov 2024.
Tadpole Raisin
(1,889 posts)From your lips to the judges gavel!!
BumRushDaShow
(156,466 posts)And people swirling around her case are still swirling.
ETA - recap
Tadpole Raisin
(1,889 posts)LudwigPastorius
(12,920 posts)I don't throw around the "Karen" moniker a lot, but it applies in this case.
She is an überKaren.
SarcasticSatyr
(1,340 posts)to Lock her up.
bluestarone
(19,935 posts)PLUS PRISON time!!
Jim__
(14,797 posts)PatrickforB
(15,245 posts)want to know:
A. What counts she was convicted of in detail, and whether they are felonies or misdemeanors.
B. What she could be sentenced to.
C. When the sentencing hearing will be.
The reporter that wrote this piece just meandered around the story without telling us anything of substance.
Shame on AP along with the other media for going downhill like they have.
It's like their senior editors care more about profits than they do about truth in news. Who'd have thunk it?
PortTack
(35,669 posts)niyad
(125,164 posts)PortTack
(35,669 posts)FakeNoose
(37,811 posts)
PortTack
(35,669 posts)RussBLib
(9,952 posts)...sucks that he can get other people to do his dirty work for him. I guess we just have to keep putting them behind bars until the other zombies sit up and take notice.
https://russblib.blogspot.com
AlexSFCA
(6,314 posts)oasis
(52,470 posts)co-conspirators, I mean ALL co-conspirators.
COL Mustard
(7,492 posts)She fucked around now shell get to find out!
dchill
(42,660 posts)Oh no! 😯
oldmanlynn
(685 posts)What she needs is a stiff sentence like 10 years in jail for doing this to send a message to all the other election deniers thinking there might be an opportunity for them
rpannier
(24,744 posts)Happy at least they're willing to go after these people
Wednesdays
(20,575 posts)
LudwigPastorius
(12,920 posts)Another dumbass goes to jail for Trump.
Give her the full 20 years for messing with the very fabric of our democracy.
jgo
(996 posts)From X (twitter) - can't vouch for whether it is accurate or not - the breakdown of the seven guilty counts:
Counts 1, 2 and 4 - three counts of attempting to influence a public servant
Counts 1, 2 and 4 have a sentencing range of 2-6 years each.
Count 6 - conspiracy to commit criminal impersonation
Count 6 - 12-18 months.
Counts 8, 9 & 10 - first-degree official misconduct, violation of duty, and failing to comply with the secretary of state.
Counts 8, 9 & 10 - 90-364 days each.