Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(157,272 posts)
Sat Jan 25, 2025, 08:47 PM Jan 2025

CIA now says COVID-19 'more likely' to have come from lab

Source: USA Today

Published 2:57 p.m. ET Jan. 25, 2025


NEW YORK - The Central Intelligence Agency has assessed that the COVID-19 pandemic is "more likely" to have emerged from a lab rather than from nature, an agency spokesperson said on Saturday.

The agency had for years said it could not conclude whether COVID-19 was the result of a lab incident or it originated in nature.

The CIA says it has "low confidence" in its assessment that a "research-related origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is more likely" and notes in its statement that both scenarios - lab origin and natural origin - remain plausible. The Chinese embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

It was unclear the extent to which the agency has collected new intelligence on COVID-19's origins and whether that new evidence was used to formulate the latest assessment.

Read more: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2025/01/25/cia-now-says-covid-19-more-likely-to-have-come-from-lab/77947876007/



Of course they did.
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CIA now says COVID-19 'more likely' to have come from lab (Original Post) BumRushDaShow Jan 2025 OP
- Truthbender John Ratcliffe has sway. dchill Jan 2025 #1
Of course, they'll say their sources and evidence are secret/classified wolfie001 Jan 2025 #2
Nope The Madcap Jan 2025 #3
that was kind of my take on the 'new assessment' as well stopdiggin Jan 2025 #4
Low confidence ForPeace Jan 2025 #5
"CIA now says COVID-19 'more likely' to have come from lab" LudwigPastorius Jan 2025 #6
"low confidence" equals "more likely" rickford66 Jan 2025 #7
Maybe the odds went from 5% to 7%... Shipwack Jan 2025 #12
Maybe the odds went from 5% to Holy shit, Trump's in power! nt Xipe Totec Jan 2025 #15
Think of it as on an x-y plane. Igel Jan 2025 #18
The Rumsfeld dilemma ? rickford66 Jan 2025 #19
What would they know about it? milestogo Jan 2025 #8
There are experts in viral genealogy who proved it was not a lab variant shortly after it emerged. PSPS Jan 2025 #13
BLAME DR FAUCI! BLAME THE CHINESE! milestogo Jan 2025 #9
Interesting timing camartinwv Jan 2025 #10
Interesting how the NIH, CDC and FDA have now been uncharacteristically prohibited yonder Jan 2025 #11
Gaslighting or reality? You decide. nt Trueblue Texan Jan 2025 #14
Sounds like they know where it came from. twodogsbarking Jan 2025 #16
Sounds like they got their marching orders from the felon. StarryNite Jan 2025 #17

wolfie001

(5,759 posts)
2. Of course, they'll say their sources and evidence are secret/classified
Sat Jan 25, 2025, 09:02 PM
Jan 2025

This is an Alex Jones Administration at this point. Nixon's "Enemies List" is quite quaint at this point.

stopdiggin

(14,095 posts)
4. that was kind of my take on the 'new assessment' as well
Sat Jan 25, 2025, 09:31 PM
Jan 2025

But, thanks for posting in any event ...

ForPeace

(143 posts)
5. Low confidence
Sat Jan 25, 2025, 09:36 PM
Jan 2025

At least they said that! Many will read the headline and believe it, but low confidence means they unsure of the validity.

LudwigPastorius

(13,024 posts)
6. "CIA now says COVID-19 'more likely' to have come from lab"
Sat Jan 25, 2025, 11:18 PM
Jan 2025

...just days after Trump takes office and orders them to say that.

What a coincidence.

Shipwack

(2,787 posts)
12. Maybe the odds went from 5% to 7%...
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 01:17 AM
Jan 2025

They still have low confidence that this is true, but it’s slightly more possible than it was before?

They’re trying to maintain a bit of dignity while they suck up to the new regime.

Igel

(37,015 posts)
18. Think of it as on an x-y plane.
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 01:33 PM
Jan 2025

One axis says how reliable your data are.

The other axis says what the data say.

Think of this as the spatial equivalent of "intersectional", with only two parameters.

You can have rock-solid data that really doesn't answer the question one way or the other. Or you can have weak data that points clearly in one direction. Sometimes weak data are all you have, and "weak" doesn't mean "wrong." Just you can't trust them to be right (or wrong).

The IPCC reports are the same way. If you don't report *both* bits of information I think it properly counts as misinformation, and very few news sources report both bits.

Always remembering that even the evaluation of the data as low or high confidence has confidence intervals associated with it.

PSPS

(14,747 posts)
13. There are experts in viral genealogy who proved it was not a lab variant shortly after it emerged.
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 02:47 AM
Jan 2025

This is just an early example of trump's loyalists and yesmen in charge and doing his bidding. So far, he has muzzled all of the real health-related government agencies, leaving the only "alternate facts" being spoken.

yonder

(10,107 posts)
11. Interesting how the NIH, CDC and FDA have now been uncharacteristically prohibited
Sun Jan 26, 2025, 12:10 AM
Jan 2025

from sharing information or making statements regarding public health concerns, while the CIA has apparently been given a megaphone to do quite the opposite.

It looks like those aspects of their charters have been exactly reversed. Everything is turning backwards, inside out or upside down.

P2025, up and running but not full steam. Yet.



Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»CIA now says COVID-19 'mo...