Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Mysterian

(6,022 posts)
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 04:37 PM 17 hrs ago

13 Senate Democrats Vote to Advance Trump Nominee During Shutdown

Source: New Republic

Thirteen Senate Democrats voted alongside Republicans Tuesday to instate a conservative judge to the Northern District of Alabama.

The Senate voted 66–32 in favor of confirming Harold “Hal” Mooty III as a U.S. district judge. Donald Trump nominated Mooty last month, and his confirmation needed a simple majority in the Senate.

The Democrats that voted in favor include:

Senators Chris Coons (Delaware)
Dick Durbin (Illinois)
John Fetterman (Pennsylvania)
Maggie Hassan (New Hampshire)
Martin Heinrich (New Mexico)
Tim Kaine (Virginia)
Mark Kelly (Arizona)
Amy Klobuchar (Minnesota)
Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
Adam Schiff (California)
Jeanne Shaheen (New Hampshire)
Peter Welch (Vermont)
Sheldon Whitehouse (Rhode Island)

Read more: https://newrepublic.com/post/202072/13-senate-democrats-vote-donald-trump-nominee-shutdown



I have to wonder why Democrats are doing anything to help republicans as the government shutdown continues and the corrupt Speaker of the House refuses to swear in an elected Democratic congresswoman.
23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
13 Senate Democrats Vote to Advance Trump Nominee During Shutdown (Original Post) Mysterian 17 hrs ago OP
🤬🤬🤬🤬 Chasstev365 16 hrs ago #1
lol RandiFan1290 16 hrs ago #2
I'm curious about that list. ificandream 16 hrs ago #3
Sheldon Whitehouse?! intheflow 16 hrs ago #4
There are several anti trump conservative judges out there mountain grammy 11 hrs ago #10
Might be part of a deal to get the heathcare tax credits covered OP. cstanleytech 16 hrs ago #5
Seems like when dealing with these people we should get our perks Hope22 16 hrs ago #6
once the judge is sworn in it is for life rampartd 16 hrs ago #8
"I have to wonder why Democrats are doing anything to help republicans" Wiz Imp 16 hrs ago #7
I get at least one or two texts a day asking doc03 16 hrs ago #9
I beg to differ Mysterian 1 hr ago #17
That's just silly. A nominee being confirmed with 50 votes vs a nominee being confirmed Wiz Imp 39 sec ago #23
Repubs did need help for cloture, which the dems provided questionseverything 1 hr ago #18
WRONG. There is no filibuster on nominees. Wiz Imp 16 min ago #22
Some "opposition party," eh? (n/t) DJ Synikus Makisimus 8 hrs ago #11
WTAF. 58Sunliner 8 hrs ago #12
Thank Goddess my two are not on that list. With the exception niyad 7 hrs ago #13
I want explanation not exploitation. Don't you? Good grief. What is going on? littlemissmartypants 6 hrs ago #15
Done deal... littlemissmartypants 6 hrs ago #14
Well the Republicans only needed 51 votes Farmer-Rick 1 hr ago #16
Wrote a few NewEnglandAutumn 50 min ago #19
Conservative isn't necessarily equal to Trumper Deminpenn 42 min ago #20
Hope you're proud of yourselves, Senate Democrats. Paladin 24 min ago #21

ificandream

(11,474 posts)
3. I'm curious about that list.
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 04:43 PM
16 hrs ago

There are some very strong liberals in there. I doubt they'd have voted for this guy if he was a complete Trumper.

mountain grammy

(28,345 posts)
10. There are several anti trump conservative judges out there
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 10:21 PM
11 hrs ago

I wish a some of them were still on the bench. doubt if I would have said that before ..

cstanleytech

(27,993 posts)
5. Might be part of a deal to get the heathcare tax credits covered OP.
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 04:46 PM
16 hrs ago

We'll just have to wait and see.

Hope22

(4,233 posts)
6. Seems like when dealing with these people we should get our perks
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 04:57 PM
16 hrs ago

Up front. There is never a guarantee with Rs.

Wiz Imp

(7,742 posts)
7. "I have to wonder why Democrats are doing anything to help republicans"
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 05:10 PM
16 hrs ago

Those votes don't help Republicans at all. The nominee would be confirmed even with 0 Democratic votes.

Note: I'm not defending the votes, I don't think any Democrat should be voting for anything on the Republican side at this point. Just pointing out that their votes don't make a difference on any nominees supported by at least 50 Republican Senators..

doc03

(38,531 posts)
9. I get at least one or two texts a day asking
Tue Oct 21, 2025, 05:29 PM
16 hrs ago

for money. This stuff and getting on the suckers list has keep me from giving.

Mysterian

(6,022 posts)
17. I beg to differ
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 08:02 AM
1 hr ago

The votes show that several Democrats showed solidarity with their republican "colleagues" as the fascist republican takeover of the U.S.A. continues apace. Anything that shows cooperation with these motherfuckers is helping them out, in my humble opinion.

Wiz Imp

(7,742 posts)
23. That's just silly. A nominee being confirmed with 50 votes vs a nominee being confirmed
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 09:36 AM
39 sec ago

with 70 votes vs a nominee being confirmed with 90 votes is irrelevant. They are all confirmed and have the exact same amount of power no matter how many votes they got. Rubio was confirmed by unanimous consent. Would he be any better if all Democrats had voted against him? Of course not. He's terrible regardless. Democratic votes did not help the Republicans at all. He was going to be confirmed regardless.

questionseverything

(11,343 posts)
18. Repubs did need help for cloture, which the dems provided
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 08:05 AM
1 hr ago

So the nominee would not have been confirmed w/o dems

Wiz Imp

(7,742 posts)
22. WRONG. There is no filibuster on nominees.
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 09:20 AM
16 min ago

If there were we would not have Noem, Bondi, Hegseth, Patel, Kennedy, and a bunch of others who were confirmed with only Republican votes.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL31980

On November 21, 2013, the Senate reinterpreted Rule XXII to allow cloture to be invoked on any nominations, except those to the Supreme Court, by a majority of Senators voting, instead of by three-fifths of the Senate. On April 6, 2017, the Senate voted to extend this reinterpretation to allow cloture to be invoked by a majority on nominations to the Supreme Court as well.

niyad

(127,999 posts)
13. Thank Goddess my two are not on that list. With the exception
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 02:00 AM
7 hrs ago

of fetterman, I am seriously depressed by that list.

littlemissmartypants

(30,348 posts)
14. Done deal...
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 02:38 AM
6 hrs ago

Cloture was invoked on his nomination by a vote of 62 to 34.[5] On October 21, 2025, his nomination was confirmed by a 66–32 vote.[6] He is awaiting his judicial commission.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harold_Mooty

Mooty is currently a partner at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings in its Huntsville, Alabama office.[2] His focus is on commercial litigation, including contract disputes, shareholder disputes, and torts. He's also practiced insurance, medical malpractice, and technology law[4][3]

Farmer-Rick

(12,168 posts)
16. Well the Republicans only needed 51 votes
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 07:44 AM
1 hr ago

They had 53 without those 13 Dems. So, I wonder what the purpose of those Dems votes was? It's certainly not a good look in the middle of a shutdown fight.

Paladin

(31,815 posts)
21. Hope you're proud of yourselves, Senate Democrats.
Wed Oct 22, 2025, 09:12 AM
24 min ago

"I Sunk Down To Fetterman's Level" is such a worthy goal attainment...

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»13 Senate Democrats Vote ...