SNAP benefits must continue despite shutdown, judge tells Trump administration
Last edited Fri Oct 31, 2025, 03:38 PM - Edit history (1)
Source: CNBC
Published Fri, Oct 31 2025 2:03 PM EDT Updated 12 Min Ago
A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday blocked the Trump administration from ceasing to pay SNAP benefits that help feed 42 million Americans during the U.S. government shutdown. The oral ruling by Judge Jack McConnell came a day before the administration was set to cut off that food stamp assistance.
A Justice Department lawyer argued during a hearing that the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program did not exist anymore because there were no congressionally appropriated funds for it as a result of the shutdown. The lawyer, Tyler Becker, also argued it was the administration’s discretion whether to use $6 billion in contingency funds already set aside by Congress to continue issuing SNAP benefits.
“There is no SNAP program and, as a result, the government cannot just provide SNAP benefits,” Becker said. But McConnell told the administration to use those contingency funds to maintain at least some of the SNAP benefits that are normally paid.
The judge also said the administration needed to examine whether other federal funds would be available to keep the program operating in the absence of a funding bill by Congress. McConnell’s ruling granted a temporary restraining order to plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Providence against the Trump administration to maintain the benefits. The Trump administration is likely to appeal the order.
Read more: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/10/31/snap-trump-judge-food-stamps-shutdown.html
Article updated.
Previous articles -
A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday blocked the Trump administration from ceasing to pay SNAP benefits that help feed 42 million Americans during the U.S. government shutdown. The oral ruling by Judge Jack McConnell came a day before the administration was set to cut off that food stamp assistance.
A Justice Department lawyer argued during a hearing that the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program did not exist anymore because there were no congressionally appropriated funds for it as a result of the shutdown. The lawyer, Tyler Becker, also argued it was the administration's discretion whether to use $6 billion in contingency funds already set aside by Congress to continue issuing SNAP benefits.
McConnell told the administration to use those funds to maintain at least some of the SNAP benefits normally paid. The judge also said the administration needed to examine whether other federal funds would be available to keep the program operating in the absence of a funding bill by Congress.
McConnell's ruling granted a temporary restraining order to plaintiffs who filed a lawsuit on Thursday in U.S. District Court in Providence against the Trump administration to maintain the benefits. The Trump administration is likely to appeal the order.
A federal judge in Rhode Island on Friday blocked the Trump administration from ceasing to pay SNAP benefits during the government shutdown.
The oral ruling by Judge Jack McConnell came a day before the administration was set to cut off those food stamp benefits from 42 million Americans.
A Justice Department lawyer argued during a hearing that the SNAP program did not exist anymore because there were no congressionally appropriated funds for it as a result of the shutdown.
The lawyer, Tyler Becker, also argued it was the administration's discretion whether to use $6 billion in contingency funds already set aside by Congress to continue issuing SNAP benefits.
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
Original article -
This is breaking news. Please refresh for updates.
= new reply since forum marked as read
McConnell’s ruling came minutes after a federal judge in Boston, Indira Talwani, in response to a separate but similar lawsuit, said that plaintiffs in that case are likely to succeed on their claim that the administration’s “suspension of SNAP benefits is unlawful.”
Talwani said she was still considering the plaintiffs’ request for a temporary restraining order to maintain the benefits.
(snip)
and ✌🏻 - this is how I know it's you posting 
Twice as successful
✌🏻
