Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madville

(7,834 posts)
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 12:03 PM Nov 10

IOC moves closer to ban on transgender women

Source: BBC

10 November 2025, 13:02 GMT

The International Olympic Committee has moved a step closer to introducing a blanket ban on transgender women from female categories across all sports.

IOC president Kirsty Coventry vowed to bring in the policy as part of her election campaign. On Monday the Times reported, external that the ban was set to be announced early next year after a presentation to IOC members by its medical chief.

In response, the IOC said that "the working group is continuing its discussions on this topic and no decisions have been taken yet". However, sources have told BBC Sport told that a ban is likely to be introduced in 2026.

Initial findings of her review are thought to have highlighted the physiological advantages that athletes born male retain, even after reducing testosterone levels. A blanket ban is unlikely to be introduced before the 2026 Winter Olympics, but could be brought in before the Los Angeles Games in 2028.

Read more: https://www.bbc.com/sport/articles/cy4p29j4z70o



Looks like an Olympic boycott is in order if they pass this new rule.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
IOC moves closer to ban on transgender women (Original Post) madville Nov 10 OP
A boycott by who? That seems highly unlikely. maxsolomon Nov 10 #1
Sponsors and viewers madville Nov 10 #2
"Would big corporate sponsors still want to be associated with the Olympics?" EX500rider Nov 10 #4
They won't need a ban before Los Angeles TommyT139 Nov 10 #3

maxsolomon

(37,917 posts)
1. A boycott by who? That seems highly unlikely.
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 12:55 PM
Nov 10
The IOC's new policy is also set to cover athletes with DSD (differences of sex development). Both World Athletics and World Boxing have introduced genetic sex screening this year to protect the integrity of women's competition.


That would screw over Imane Khelif.

madville

(7,834 posts)
2. Sponsors and viewers
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 02:38 PM
Nov 10

Would big corporate sponsors still want to be associated with the Olympics?

EX500rider

(12,105 posts)
4. "Would big corporate sponsors still want to be associated with the Olympics?"
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 06:53 PM
Nov 10

It does not poll real well:

Nearly 70% of US adults say transgender athletes should be allowed to compete only on sports teams that correspond with the sexes they were assigned at birth

https://www.nbcnews.com/nbc-out/out-news/americans-oppose-inclusion-trans-athletes-sports-poll-finds-rcna88940

TommyT139

(2,100 posts)
3. They won't need a ban before Los Angeles
Mon Nov 10, 2025, 05:59 PM
Nov 10

... because the trumpist regime won't grant trans people visas if their gender markers don't follow the fascist binary.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»IOC moves closer to ban o...