Patel Under Scrutiny for Use of SWAT Teams to Protect His Girlfriend
Source: New York Times
Nov. 23, 2025 Updated 7:08 a.m. ET
When Alexis Wilkins, an aspiring country singer dating the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, sang "The Star-Spangled Banner" at the National Rifle Association's annual convention in Atlanta in the spring, she arrived with a formidable protective posse -- a SWAT team from the bureau's local field office.
The two agents, members of a specialized unit trained to storm barricaded buildings and rescue hostages, had been sent there on Mr. Patel's orders. But seeing that the event at the Georgia World Congress Center had been secured, and that Ms. Wilkins was in no apparent danger, they left before the event was over, according to six people with knowledge of the incident.
She noticed. So did her boyfriend. Soon after, Mr. Patel ripped into the team's commander, saying that his girlfriend had been left without taxpayer-funded defenders, and slamming what he saw as failure to communicate their movements up the chain of command during her time on the convention floor -- where she sang and chatted with attendees, the people said. He was concerned that Ms. Wilkins, a high-profile conservative, might be attacked by people who had threatened her online.
Mr. Patel's heavy use of taxpayer-funded resources during his first nine months on the job has contributed to growing questions inside the administration about whether it exceeds the bounds of standard practice. This includes an intense use of security to protect himself and his girlfriend.
Read more: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/23/us/politics/kash-patel-girlfriend-fbi-protection.html
No paywall (gift)
Bengus81
(9,614 posts)The next week they file with the FAA to make it's numbers private to tracking sites.
Mz Pip
(28,296 posts)is that Kash Patel has a girlfriend.
Polybius
(21,215 posts)
sdfernando
(5,977 posts)patel is just a stepping stone.
slightlv
(7,107 posts)I think we can all agree, this exceeds ALL standards. As do the actions of absolutely every single person on his Cabinet. From millions spent on secret service and other "security" apparatus, to paying grift for legitimate prior investigations, nothing anyone in his cabinet attempts is considered out of bounds. They are all perfectly appropriate for the richest of the rich who serve him. And make no mistake, they serve *him*... not the people. That's why they avail themselves of OUR money to do their bidding and make their lives that much easier. I can only hope the flip side is as appealing to them, if and when it comes.