Trump takes populist turn against health insurers
Source: The Hill
11/28/25 5:00 PM ET
President Trump is blaming health insurers for rising health care costs, adopting a populist approach as he seeks to counter attacks by Democrats that the GOP has done too little to keep health care affordable. Democrats are pushing Congress to quickly hold a vote on extending the Affordable Care Act (ACA) enhanced premium tax credits scheduled to expire at the end of this year.
Trump is reportedly preparing a proposal that would extend the subsidies for two years, along with a series of reforms favored by Republicans, but delayed an announcement facing GOP pushback. Whether or not a deal gets done, Democrats have used the shutdown to put Republicans on defense over health care, and Trump and his allies are looking to reframe the conversation by making insurers enemy No. 1.
Im sure the White House realizes that, you know, having premiums increase on voters ahead, especially heading into an election year where affordability is a big conversation, is not ideal politically, one GOP campaign strategist told The Hill. They may come to some kind of deal, but that will kind of maybe help alleviate the attention thats being directed at insurance companies right now. But healthcare is still going to be a big issue.
Trump said last week he would only support a plan involving sending the money directly back to the people, aiming to circumvent insurance companies. The only healthcare I will support or approve is sending the money directly back to the people, with nothing going to the big, fat, rich insurance companies, who have made $trillions, and ripped off America long enough, Trump wrote on Truth Social.
Read more: https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/5621976-trump-blames-insurers-healthcare/
jfz9580m
(16,205 posts)Opportunistic stopped clock..
BaronChocula
(3,856 posts)separated children from their parents with no plan or mechanism to reunite them.
Same guy who fired nuclear weapons workers "to shrink government" before realizing they were important.
Same guy who's detaining u.s. citizens for "immigration violations"
And so on. I wouldn't trust him to return money I'm owed.
wolfie001
(6,633 posts)Is at the top of my list. That fat, old, pig imbecile.
BaronChocula
(3,856 posts)that would be a top factor in deciding the election. I didn't realize how much more important chicken eggs were to people than the life of women. What little faith I had in people's judgement was blown out.
wolfie001
(6,633 posts)RandySF
(80,211 posts)And require Americans to directly pay doctors and hospitals like people do in many developing countries.
The Madcap
(1,634 posts)T**** will pay for your cyanide prescription.
bmichaelh
(1,057 posts)I am a a lymphoma survivor in my third remission; first diagnosed in 1990.
My maintenance treatments cost just under $1million year.
My insurer does not pay out that; cancer clinic get half through discounts.
I do not see the federal government writing checks directly to my cancer clinic.
TommyT139
(2,113 posts)...for all those MRIs out of his own pocket.
And if he hadn't gotten that cutting edge experimental covid treatment in his first administration, we'd all be in a much different place right now.
KPN
(17,059 posts)at a pace and to a tune of trillions.
Bettie
(19,157 posts)this month? That's what I'm thinking.
paleotn
(21,272 posts)Or he's soliciting a big check.
617Blue
(2,156 posts)debsy
(725 posts)When he says sending the money back to the American people, he means the morbidly wealthy, including himself and his family. Everything he does is designed to transfer wealth from the 99% to the top 1% (using rounded figures, of course, since we all know the numbers are closer to 99.9% to 0.1%).
jfz9580m
(16,205 posts)Thats the first time I have heard that term and I like it
..
debsy
(725 posts)I cant take credit for it, though. It truly is a thing:
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/deconstructing-illness/202302/morbid-wealth]
paleotn
(21,272 posts)and he'll shut up about it. Republicans have any sort of plan since they don't want reform. They want things to go back to what they were pre ACA.
azureblue
(2,631 posts)He knows he's losing (spelled with one ("o"
supporters so he'll say anything to get them back. Do something is a different matter.
Hope22
(4,376 posts)Now life is dissected into two week and two year bits. Business, international relations and individuals can not survive with continual disruption of economic, health insurance and irrational behavior from our government. Stability is nonexistent under this administration. Life is a river of uncertainty and despair for a large portion of the population. The ACA was jerked with out of hatred by people who are given healthcare, retirement, paid income when they shut the government down and access to insider trading and financial information. Life as a hostage for most of us is a futile act of existence.
lonely bird
(2,648 posts)Examine explanations of benefits
discounts, credits, acceptance of payment as paid in full that are a percentage of charges.
Yes, the insurance companies as well as pharmacy benefit managers cause opacity and, imo, chaos resulting in profit. The stupidity is that giving money back to the people doesnt trigger reduced costs. Imo, the only solution is single payer at best or something like Canadas system at worst.
lostincalifornia
(4,837 posts)the American public.
bronxiteforever
(10,996 posts)Give the money to the citizen. 2,000.00. With that money you must insure yourself for a year.
If you have a preexisting condition the insurer cant not cover you but can charge you 4xs as much as a healthy person.
The government will not be responsible for any expenses beyond the flat dollar amount. If anything goes wrong and you cant afford extra procedures welcome to the river Styx. Regardless of your condition you get the flat government dollar and no more. As was said in the movie Goodfellows:

ToxMarz
(2,648 posts)Insurance - the practice of managing the risk of a large, unexpected financial hit by sharing the risk is known as risk pooling or risk transfer.
You can not give everyone enough money to cover every potential risk, there isn't enough money and it is extraordinarly inefficient.
Unfortunately, the only answer is to do the hard work of managing the insurance system which no one seems to want to do and because of the amount money involved it is riff with corruption .
Medicare for all would be a good start.
GreenWave
(12,094 posts)Or do the masses get mere words, no action?
travelingthrulife
(3,994 posts)kimbutgar
(26,543 posts)By tomorrow he will forget he even said that. I call bs on his comments he doesnt give a shit about the American people only himself and his wealthy donors.
BradBo
(851 posts)melm00se
(5,132 posts)Shiny object in the room.
Gimpyknee
(988 posts)SSJVegeta
(2,090 posts)no_hypocrisy
(53,910 posts)and I still wouldn't have enough funds to finance my healthcare, esp. as I age.
Ocelot II
(128,486 posts)I can't imagine he's willing to give that up. The money he wants to send directly to the people will end up back in the coffers of United Health et al. because unless we get universal health care people will need health insurance. So we'll go back to having to buy coverage that doesn't cover anything.
Javaman
(64,971 posts)he will have a "big meeting" with the healthcare CEOs who will promptly verbally blow him, shower him with bullshit and dime store tickets.
then the orange asshole will have one of his, now very predictable, change of mind
Raftergirl
(1,786 posts)Now its too late for them to do anything irt health insurance costs. People will begin to have to pay a lot more in January or have to drop it. The fury of the people will undeniable and the Republicans will be blamed.
Millions and millions of MAGA voters are affected. Its different then the costs of tariffs to the consumer as that affects people in dribs and drabs. The increase in premiums is huge and will be felt immediately.
not fooled
(6,553 posts)in case there are any 'Muricans stupid enough to still believe him. Oh please, b*tch.
If his donors could figure out how to turn a profit on the bodies of the dead killed by insufficient healthcare, he'd be completely on board.
ificandream
(11,586 posts)None of this will happen. Those of you who accuse NYT and the Post of letting him slide should now be saying that to The Hill. This is pure b.s. to take attention away from Jeffrey Epstein.
hibbing
(10,497 posts)Let me guess, take away all the minimum requirements that are in place today. Oh yeah, and somehow a tax cut for the ruling class will have to be a part of these "reforms". What a crap article.
Its only politics for them, and they admit it. Helping people is beyond their comprehension.
trump idea of sending money to people directly will never work. They will only spend it on luxuries like food and rent.
duckworth969
(1,027 posts)& again & again Vought will tell him what to do. Or Witkoff. Or Miller. Or Bannon. Or Loomer. Or Wiles. Presidential decisions by committee.
Evolve Dammit
(21,362 posts)Americanme
(325 posts)Either give us single payer, or shut yer face. As long as insurers are paying executives multiple millions every year, we will not have affordable health care.