Hegseth responds to report that boat survivors were killed as a result of his orders to military
Source: ABC News
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth responded to a report that he ordered the military to kill all passengers aboard a boat suspected of ferrying drugs in the Caribbean Sea in September.
According to The Washington Post, the Sept. 2 boat strike initially left two survivors clinging to the boat. The Post alleges Adm. Mitch Bradley, head of Special Operations Command, then ordered a second strike in order to comply with Hegseth's orders and to ensure the survivors couldn't call on other traffickers to retrieve them and their cargo.
In a post on X on Friday, Hegseth said the strikes were intended to be "lethal, kinetic strikes."
"Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflictand approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command," Hegseth said.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/hegseth-declines-comment-report-boat-survivors-killed-result/story?id=127951385
DemMedic
(553 posts)He should be the first one.
RockCreek
(1,202 posts)Roy Rolling
(7,363 posts)He should save them for opening statements at his trial.
underpants
(194,132 posts)Link to tweet
?s=46&t=3VBm1LJ8j8qLp6JTs_8J2A
sop
(17,040 posts)Sounds like a Hegsethian euphemism for extrajudicial killing.
muriel_volestrangler
(105,298 posts)His claim that the best lawyers told him it was legal looks unlikely. Most lawyers commentating have say "way illegal", which is why many countries have stopped giving the US intelligence in the Caribbean, so that they're not accessories to crimes. I expect they eventually found a gung-ho lawyer idiot or two to give them carte blanche to kill, and will have to use that in their defense when they're eventually brought to justice.
Uncle Joe
(63,821 posts)not fooled
(6,553 posts)that's what this douche cares about--doing what Krasnov wants and propping up his manhood.
Wednesdays
(21,465 posts)That hardly tells us why it isn't murder.
JustAnotherGen
(37,423 posts)He murdered those people. It's a human rights violation and an act of war.
I'm not coming together with the family members of Liberals who voted for this when the regime falls.
We aren't coming together and moving forward. We did that in 1877 and the sick little fuckers "rose again".
To be clear: I hate magapubs.
Chi67
(1,267 posts)This time, we take out the trash. There is no reasoning with MAGAs. And fascist organizations etc need to be made illegal. There need to be exceptions to the first amendment.
ashredux
(2,823 posts)hay rick
(9,239 posts)Good lawyers would have said "Hell, no!" Better lawyers would have said "No fucking way." Turns out the "best" lawyers thought "lethal, kinetic strikes" were some kind of harmless entertainment made for Fox News.
C_U_L8R
(48,622 posts)Still don't make it right, boozebreath.
travelingthrulife
(3,994 posts)Ponietz
(4,215 posts)Deuxcents
(24,998 posts)orangecrush
(27,731 posts)Midnight Writer
(25,035 posts)I couldn't remember Yoo's first name, so I googled "torture lawyer" and his name was the first thing that came up.
Hope22
(4,376 posts)Good work!
not fooled
(6,553 posts)Be a douche, expect to be called one.
OMGWTF
(4,972 posts)How many times do we have to endure the same sh!t from these lawless people? Bush and Cheney should have been in The Hague on trial for crimes against humanity. The Rethuglican party must be eliminated.
Alpeduez21
(1,994 posts)travelingthrulife
(3,994 posts)ashredux
(2,823 posts)travelingthrulife
(3,994 posts)Gimpyknee
(988 posts)LudwigPastorius
(13,887 posts)Don't forget gin.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/Yd4EYt6JbY4?feature=share
John1956PA
(4,642 posts)Occasionally, I prefer sipping a Canadian whisky on the rocks. I think that gulping down alcohol is a waste of it.
LudwigPastorius
(13,887 posts)But yeah, if you have to drown your booze in a mixer just so you can drink more of it, you likely have a problem.
NCDem47
(3,257 posts)ZERO. To anyone.
Martin Eden
(15,222 posts)Which is understandable, since lying is a requirement for a speaking position in the Trump administration. Not just spin; bold faced lies.
Hegseth honed those skills as a weekend host on Fox News.
BattleRow
(2,062 posts)AverageOldGuy
(3,203 posts)patphil
(8,548 posts)Hegseth's lawyers will tell him exactly what he wants to hear. That's why they're there.
Or, perhaps they advised him of the law, but his brain translated it into a legal confirmation of his beliefs.
Irish_Dem
(78,343 posts)paleotn
(21,272 posts)Picaro
(2,310 posts)Your lawyers (the ones you failed to consult) should have told you that centuries of maritime law require that you save survivors even in war once the threat is eliminated. Since there was never a threat youd have a hell of a time proving that your orders were anything but illegal.
Aviation Pro
(15,125 posts)During our 20-year war period. Its a sanitized version for killing or blowing them up.
TheFarseer
(9,741 posts)For other countries like the UK, Germany, France etc to demand to know WTF we are doing?! None of this is legal. Or are they speaking up and we are not hearing about it?
NickB79
(20,191 posts)And then claim their hand-picked replacement lawyers told them it's all perfectly legal.
Imagine that.
BattleRow
(2,062 posts)With no consequences?
LetMyPeopleVote
(173,289 posts)I hope that the Senate does investigate this asshole

tavernier
(14,133 posts)Name the Lawyers. Im sure they will want to corroborate your orders.
duckworth969
(1,027 posts)if Chumpkin is the prez.
Paladin
(32,109 posts)In a nation with a shred of remaining decency in its leadership, we'd have a new Secretary of Defense. Beyond shameful.
Cirsium
(3,221 posts)That guy: "Our current operations in the Caribbean are lawful under both U.S. and international law, with all actions in compliance with the law of armed conflict..."
What "armed conflict?" With whom is the US at war?
ABC: "Critics of the Trump administration and some legal experts have questioned the legality of the strikes." Both-siderism at its very worst.
Some call intentionally killing innocent unarmed people murder, others call it "lethal, kinetic strikes." ABC is giving us "both sides" of the issue.
KPN
(17,059 posts)Yeah, just like he's "the best" Secretary of Defense as well.
Martin68
(26,739 posts)actions in compliance with the law of armed conflictand approved by the best military and civilian lawyers, up and down the chain of command," Hegseth said.