Woman In AI-Altered Image Posted By White House Says FBI Agent Told Her the Photo Wouldn't Be Posted On Social Media
Source: MEDIAite
Jan 23rd, 2026, 9:29 pm
The woman whose photograph was digitally altered by the White House said she was told by the FBI agent recording her that the footage would not be used on social media. Nekima Levy Armstrong joined CNN host Erin Burnett to discuss her arrest for organizing an anti-ICE protest at the Cities Church in St. Paul last week.
Armstrong had been released from custody mere hours before speaking to Burnett, after federal judges found that the prosecutors had failed to establish that Armstrong and other organizers arrested were a flight risk or continued detention was otherwise legally warranted. Her arrest was the subject of heightened media scrutiny after the White House posted a photo of what appeared to be an upset Armstrong sobbing as an officer escorted her away an image the White House later confirmed had been digitally altered.
Both the White Houses doctored image and an unedited version posted by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem appear to be screen grabs of footage from the arrest. This footage was likely filmed by an agent taking part in the arrest, based on the angle and other recordings of the event.
At the time when I questioned the FBI agent about why he was recording, he had a smirk on his face, said Armstrong. She told Burnett that the agent filming her told her specifically the footage wouldnt go on Twitter/X the exact social media platform where it was later posted by both Noem and the White House.
Read more: https://www.mediaite.com/media/news/woman-in-ai-altered-image-posted-by-white-house-says-fbi-agent-told-her-the-photo-wouldnt-be-posted-on-social-media/
Link to tweet
@OutFrontCNN
·
Follow
"When I asked him about the recording, he said, 'oh, it's not going to go on twitter or anything'. ... I didn't find out until we were in federal custody."
Nekima Levy Armstrong, one of the organizers of the anti-ICE protest at a Minnesota church, reacts to the White House's Show more
8:49 PM · Jan 23, 2026
multigraincracker
(37,061 posts)I would think she might have a good case in civil court. Id seek multiple millions.
kerouac2
(1,450 posts)But it's a whole other thing it seems to alter a picture like that and post it. It was clearly done to humiliate her publicly.
Defamation: Altering a photo to create a false, harmful impression (making someone appear to commit a crime or in a humiliating context) can lead to defamation charges.
purr-rat beauty
(1,041 posts)Thus evidence or admissible in court thus not only defamation but also tampering with evidence or obstruction of justice.
kerouac2
(1,450 posts)didn't think of that...
mopinko
(73,349 posts)like they do.