Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,589 posts)
Mon Jan 26, 2026, 09:17 AM 23 hrs ago

Judge set to hear arguments on Minnesota's immigration crackdown after fatal shootings

Source: AP

Updated 9:02 AM EST, January 26, 2026


MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — A federal judge will hear arguments Monday on whether she should at least temporarily halt the immigration crackdown in Minnesota that has led to the fatal shootings of two people by government officers.

The state of Minnesota and the cities of Minneapolis and St. Paul sued the Department of Homeland Security earlier this month, five days after Renee Good was shot by an Immigration and Customs officer. The shooting of Alex Pretti by a Border Patrol officer on Saturday has only added urgency to the case.

Since the original filing, the state and cities have substantially added to their original request in an effort to restore the order that existed before the Trump administration launched Operation Metro Surge in Minnesota on Dec. 1. Democratic Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison said he plans to attend.

The lawsuit asks U.S. District Judge Katherine Menendez to order a reduction in the number of federal law enforcement officers and agents in Minnesota back to the level before the surge and to limit the scope of the enforcement operation.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/shooting-minneapolis-protests-ice-immigration-lawsuit-5bd12d70d3c76bfe5eacd802ce7480a7

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge set to hear arguments on Minnesota's immigration crackdown after fatal shootings (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 23 hrs ago OP
I am not holding my breath. OldBaldy1701E 22 hrs ago #1
And if the judge rules against Trump, he'll file an immediate appeal, another judge will grant a stay... Miles Archer 21 hrs ago #2
"But from where I'm standing, the ONLY outstanding judgement against Trump is the money he owes E Jean Carroll" BumRushDaShow 19 hrs ago #4
Can't really count that one FBaggins 18 hrs ago #5
If there are no final judgements and both are under an appeal BumRushDaShow 18 hrs ago #6
What's to hear? Bondi already stated they're there so she can get the voter rolls. MLWR 20 hrs ago #3

Miles Archer

(22,052 posts)
2. And if the judge rules against Trump, he'll file an immediate appeal, another judge will grant a stay...
Mon Jan 26, 2026, 10:26 AM
21 hrs ago

Trump has spent a lifetime gumming up the legal works..."delay, delay, delay," file one frivolous motion after another.

I'm not suggesting that the courts SHOULDN'T attempt to rein him in.

But from where I'm standing, the ONLY outstanding judgement against Trump is the money he owes E Jean Carroll, which HE WILL NEVER PAY.

This is what he does. And it's what he'll do in this instance, regardless of what the judge decides.

BumRushDaShow

(166,589 posts)
4. "But from where I'm standing, the ONLY outstanding judgement against Trump is the money he owes E Jean Carroll"
Mon Jan 26, 2026, 12:55 PM
19 hrs ago

That's not the only one. He owes the state of NY from the big business fraud case that the NY AG Tisha James got a judgment for (that is still under appeal).

FBaggins

(28,657 posts)
5. Can't really count that one
Mon Jan 26, 2026, 01:27 PM
18 hrs ago

Unless you're going to throw the Carroll ruling off the list because it's still under appeal.

BumRushDaShow

(166,589 posts)
6. If there are no final judgements and both are under an appeal
Mon Jan 26, 2026, 01:34 PM
18 hrs ago

then yes, both should be off the list ALTHOUGH the funds (in various manners, including as bonds/sureties) for them were put in escrow in order to do the appeal.

MLWR

(840 posts)
3. What's to hear? Bondi already stated they're there so she can get the voter rolls.
Mon Jan 26, 2026, 12:06 PM
20 hrs ago

Which is HIGHLY ILLEGAL. In addition to being EXTORTION, she has no (legal) business with Minnesota's voter rolls.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge set to hear argumen...