Judge says government may not search devices seized from Post reporter
Source: msn/Washington Post
38m
A federal judge in Virginia rejected the Justice Departments request to search through a Washington Post reporters electronic devices as part of a national security leak investigation, ruling that the court would instead be responsible for conducting the search.
The Tuesday ruling suggested that Magistrate Judge William Porter did not trust the government to conduct a narrow search of the devices and feared that such an examination could risk exposing more than 1,000 of the reporters government sources to the Justice Department.
Given the documented reporting on government leak investigations and the governments well chronicled efforts to stop them, allowing the governments filter team to search a reporters work product most of which consists of unrelated information from confidential sources is the equivalent of leaving the governments fox in charge of the Washington Posts henhouse, Porter wrote.
Porter also sharply criticized prosecutors for not briefing him in their search warrant application on a federal law that protects reporters against searches in many situations: the Privacy Protection Act of 1980. Their failure to inform him about the law before he approved the warrant in the case has seriously undermined the Courts confidence in the governments disclosures in this proceeding, he wrote.
Read more: https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/judge-says-government-may-not-search-devices-seized-from-post-reporter/ar-AA1X0hUk
Link to ORDER (PDF) - https://washingtonpost.com/documents/820e7a03-efb5-4c3c-a02b-d9b5a48ef737.pdf
Deuxcents
(26,318 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(177,874 posts)I am glad that the court rejected the search of this reporter's devices
A Virginia federal judge delivered a sharp rebuke to the Justice Department on Tuesday, refusing to let prosecutors search through a Washington Post reporter's seized electronics and taking control of the operation himself.
— Raw Story (@rawstory.com) 2026-02-24T23:55:09.449Z
https://www.rawstory.com/washington-post-trump-2675328550
Magistrate Judge William Porter didn't mince words over the handing over of devices to government investigators.
Given the documented reporting on government leak investigations and the governments well chronicled efforts to stop them, allowing the governments filter team to search a reporters work product most of which consists of unrelated information from confidential sources is the equivalent of leaving the governments fox in charge of the Washington Posts henhouse, Porter wrote, according to The Washington Post.
The judge feared Trump's Justice Department couldn't be trusted to conduct a narrow search without exposing more than 1,000 of reporter Hannah Natanson's confidential sources.
The decision represented a major victory for the newspaper and Natanson after federal agents conducted an unprecedented January raid on her Virginia home, seizing phones, laptops, a recorder, hard drive, and even a Garmin watch. Law enforcement claimed the search targeted a government contractor suspected of leaking classified information.
Miguelito Loveless
(5,629 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(10,848 posts)Now, we wait to see if they act on any of that information.
Because if certain employees within the government are suddenly fired, or mistreated in any way, we will know for sure that they did so.
Which would normally mean some serious jail time. But, since that is no longer a thing in the US for anyone above a certain wealth level, we know that won't be happening.
SomewhereInTheMiddle
(640 posts)... that saw "Fox in the henhouse" and immediately thought it was referring to the "news" station?
I guess I have so traumatized by Fox's presence in the RW circle of madness that I immediately leap to blame them.